Szdfan wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but haven’t you said in the past that we need the 2nd Amendment in order for the government to be afraid of an armed citizenry?
I said the reason for the 2nd Amendment is to fight government tyranny. I see no reason to remove it, but if it needs to be removed, it needs to be done through a constitutional amendment, not presidential, judicial, or congressional action.
Szdfan wrote:What does it mean for the government to be afraid of the populous? In what ways does the populous make the government afraid?
By voting and populous pressure, this would remind the elected that they work for the elected and will not continue to work for the elected if they do not represent their constituents more times then not.
Bootstrap wrote:There are always people falsely characterizing peaceful protests as dangerous, violent extremists. There are always violent extremists posing as peaceful protesters.
It is not what they are posing as, it is if there is violence and destruction of private property. This means the peaceful may need to police their own. MLK did this. Some of the recent protesters have done this.