temporal1 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 5:08 pm
Where have i ever-ever suggested “one side”?
Where have you been upset when someone convicted of a felony is pardoned, together with financial deals that sure look like someone is making money in exchange for the pardon? Do any of the presidential pardons bother you?
I think the examples you choose are consistently one sided. Social media manipulates us emotionally, and apparently, MN is a place to promote whatever they are saying.
At some point, if we don't like corruption or bribery or whatever, we have to define those terms, and ask how we can tell if those things are happening. Ditto for political weaponization of the DOJ. Otherwise, we're just sitting around calling each other emotional names, without ever getting an understanding of basic terms like justice.
Terms that the Bible mentions quite a bit.
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.