Bunny Trails

When it just doesn't fit anywhere else.
Bootstrap
Posts: 3828
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 3:38 pm
Affiliation: Virginia Conference

Re: A quiz...

Post by Bootstrap »

Why do you ask? It is beyond understanding.
0 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
JohnH
Posts: 9506
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: A quiz...

Post by JohnH »

Made me think of a Disney film on some island.
0 x
temporal1
Posts: 5277
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:57 pm
Affiliation: Christian

A quiz Re: Bunny Trails

Post by temporal1 »

ohio jones wrote: ↑Mon Feb 23, 2026 11:09 am
Ernie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 23, 2026 7:41 am please wait 24 hours before discussing
Reminder.
:lol:
Ernie comes up with the most interesting OP instructions.
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.

”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
Bootstrap
Posts: 3828
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 3:38 pm
Affiliation: Virginia Conference

Re: Bunny Trails

Post by Bootstrap »

JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:26 pm Did you use an LLM to write that?

If so, would you mind sharing the prompt?
If you are thinking of the longer post, I did ask an LLM to do things like "Fact check this and identify anything that is not verifiable" and "Help me frame this in a way that is fair". I also asked it to criticize what I had written so I could think about what I might want to change.

Some of my fact gathering was done with an LLM, but I check sources when I do that.

I almost never post anything that is just raw output from an LLM.
0 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
JohnH
Posts: 9506
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: Bunny Trails

Post by JohnH »

Bootstrap wrote: ↑Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:32 pm
JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:26 pm Did you use an LLM to write that?

If so, would you mind sharing the prompt?
If you are thinking of the longer post, I did ask an LLM to do things like "Fact check this and identify anything that is not verifiable" and "Help me frame this in a way that is fair". I also asked it to criticize what I had written so I could think about what I might want to change.

Some of my fact gathering was done with an LLM, but I check sources when I do that.

I almost never post anything that is just raw output from an LLM.
Would you mind sharing the prompts that generated the output you cut and pasted?
0 x
Bootstrap
Posts: 3828
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 3:38 pm
Affiliation: Virginia Conference

Re: Bunny Trails

Post by Bootstrap »

JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:34 pm
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:32 pm
JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:26 pm Did you use an LLM to write that?

If so, would you mind sharing the prompt?
If you are thinking of the longer post, I did ask an LLM to do things like "Fact check this and identify anything that is not verifiable" and "Help me frame this in a way that is fair". I also asked it to criticize what I had written so I could think about what I might want to change.

Some of my fact gathering was done with an LLM, but I check sources when I do that.

I almost never post anything that is just raw output from an LLM.
Would you mind sharing the prompts that generated the output you cut and pasted?
I really didn't do this the way you imagine. There is not "a prompt that generated the output that I cut and pasted". It simply doesn't exist.
0 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
temporal1
Posts: 5277
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:57 pm
Affiliation: Christian

2026 Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by temporal1 »

2026

2021 / P.6:
Josh wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 6:32 pm Beth Moore supports women in church leadership positions, which is an unbiblical position, and also a hallmark of someone moving in a liberal direction. (Denominations that adopt this generally don’t stay conservative very long; this is happening in the SBC for example.)

Moore has a history of always taking the liberal sides in events, such as when she made a statement against the March for Life incident with Sandmann (since withdrawn).

She’s as guilty of joining social media goon squads as anyone.
memory /no memory

In my heart, i felt Elizabeth Smart’s dad was involved in her shocking disappearance. 2002
i’m not sure i told anyone. i had such a bad feeling about him. (so often, close loved ones are guilty.) it seemed reasonable to imagine.

i was 100% wrong.
i still feel bad about having such bad thoughts about him. even tho i didn’t speak about it to anyone.
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.

”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
justme
Posts: 250
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:03 pm
Location: central pa
Affiliation: hermit

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by justme »

I'm really confused.
What does elizabeth smart have to do w beth moore?
0 x
Anything seems possible if you don't know what you are talking about. fb meme
You're entitled to your opinion, but I'm also entitled to ignore that nonsense. another fb meme
temporal1
Posts: 5277
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:57 pm
Affiliation: Christian

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by temporal1 »

justme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2026 9:11 pm I'm really confused.
What does elizabeth smart have to do w beth moore?
sorry to confuse.
i wanted to make a point about my wrongful judgment of elizabeth’s father. once elizabeth returned home, it was clear her father wasn’t involved.

it’s really easy to jump to negative conclusions. it’s hard to resist the temptation.
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.

”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
ohio jones
Posts: 2345
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:03 pm
Affiliation: Rosedale Network

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by ohio jones »

temporal1 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2026 9:26 pm
justme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2026 9:11 pm I'm really confused.
What does elizabeth smart have to do w beth moore?
sorry to confuse.
i wanted to make a point about my wrongful judgment of elizabeth’s father. once elizabeth returned home, it was clear her father wasn’t involved.

it’s really easy to jump to negative conclusions. it’s hard to resist the temptation.
Is jumping to negative conclusions part of the Hegelian dialectic? :?
0 x
Post Reply