Bigfoot sightings?
Bigfoot sightings?
͏͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
0 x
-
Mayberry
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Michigan
- Affiliation: Truly Conservative
Re: Bigfoot sightings?
Well, I didn't see any noted here in your post, nor any links to some reference. So, I looked around outside. I didn't see any out there, either. I guess the answer is, "No. No Bigfoot sightings here. At least not today." (grin)
2 x
Re: Bigfoot sightings?
The government erased the content of his original post.
1 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
Re: Bigfoot sightings?
John’s original blank post is a brilliant piece of performance art.
The reason why it’s blank is because Bigfoot doesn’t exist, and therefore there is nothing to say.
But rather than saying it directly, John’s use of negative space invites us to consider the futility of conspiracy theories (there’s no “there” there) as well as the beauty of mystery, by inviting us to imagine the possibilities of Bigfoot. John’s post invites us to “fill in the blanks” with our own meaning.
I believe this might be the wisest and most profound statement that John has ever posted on MennoNet. Bravo!
The reason why it’s blank is because Bigfoot doesn’t exist, and therefore there is nothing to say.
But rather than saying it directly, John’s use of negative space invites us to consider the futility of conspiracy theories (there’s no “there” there) as well as the beauty of mystery, by inviting us to imagine the possibilities of Bigfoot. John’s post invites us to “fill in the blanks” with our own meaning.
I believe this might be the wisest and most profound statement that John has ever posted on MennoNet. Bravo!
0 x
"Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless."
-- Isaiah 10:1-2
-- Isaiah 10:1-2
Re: Bigfoot sightings?
I suspect Steve is responding to the recent article in The Budget about a sighting outside of Sugar Creek. It contains this image:
https://www.facebook.com/TheBudgetNewspaper/
1 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
-
Ken
- Posts: 21863
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
- Location: Washington State
- Affiliation: former MCUSA
Re: Bigfoot sightings?
From XKCD
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
-
JohnL
- Posts: 2790
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:40 pm
- Location: The Bionic Hillbilly
- Affiliation: Free Will Baptist
Re: Bigfoot sightings?
A few small towns like to use Bigfoot "sightings" as a tourist draw.
Local old timers say "Never saw a Bigfoot. Have seen a lot of Big Mouths."
Local old timers say "Never saw a Bigfoot. Have seen a lot of Big Mouths."
1 x
Free Will Baptist <-> Anabaptist
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz