It’s never worded this way, but (i think) in the mainstream, the matter is almost entirely about protecting+funding for-profit corporate abortionists.
The only individual mothers who are prosecuted for killing their unborn/newborn, are those who dare do it alone, outside corporate profits. In the U.S., most of the reports (i notice) are of young teens or college students, who somehow hide their pregnancies, give birth alone (and presumably terrified) and kill their child in some manner, by violence or neglect. As well, some fathers are prosecuted for harming or killing their unborn children whether violently or thru deceit (example, secretly adding abortion drugs to drink).
Society and courts can be merciless to these individuals, while protective and rewarding of for-profits, who do the same thing, in these cases, 100% premeditated. Outside these professionals, “premeditated” and “for profit” killing are judged harshly in courts of law. All this is peculiar to ending defenseless human life.
i have not noticed one member on MD or MN who suggested criminalizing mothers in any of these situations.
quite a lot on adoption, education, esp about evangelizing (education of God’s Truth and conversion).
in the world, i notice proposed/new laws specify mothers will not be prosecuted - so,
mysteriously, it appears legal language does NOT have to automatically default to pre-RvW legal language. imagine that! such precision!
a lot of fear-mongering is based on these “UNTRUTHS.”
funny how loyal to corporate profits people can be made to be. it’s one of the “wonders of the world.”
temporal1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 05, 2021 12:56 pm
Josh wrote: ↑Sun Sep 05, 2021 12:52 pm
Abortion is a big for profit industry.
The Texas law now lets pro life people have some of that money. And that’s why liberals are so mad.
it’s definitely about corporate profits. without, this topic would be “crickets.” guaranteed!
we deceive ourselves. and we are deceived.
it can be absolutely impossible to admit error. egos are no small factor in this.
1. There is so much new medical science readily available since RvW. This, alone, is basis for courts to revisit.
2. As well, the world now documents beyond doubt, legalizing+funding abortion leads to rampant trivialized abortion for convenience, NOT the loudly promised, “safe, legal, rare.”
i’m speaking about the U.S., not about Canada or other countries. i’ve read, there is international travel to Canada to get abortions, often used for aborting females; and, some countries, like China, India, have female infanticide.
Safe Haven / Preventing women from harming their babies (i think SH began by a doctor in China who illegally saved babies)
https://theconversation.com/safe-haven- ... abies-5120
This is Australia, SH is in the U.S. and Canada, too. ^^
- - - - -
i chose “Other.”
because i don’t think 1 option, alone, is enough to make the needed change.
some of the options are widely practiced, but, without a broad approach, are not enough.
i suppose, paramount would be widely recognized REASONS WHY fornication is wrong, why abortion/murder is wrong, along with widely recognized constructive options for PREVENTION of unwanted pregnancies, AND, life-affirming options for responding to unwanted pregnancies.
Most of all, to transform “unwanted” into wanted and loved. Which is entirely possible.
Prior to RvW, this transformation of thinking was quite a common phenomena.
