Ken wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 3:08 pm
nett wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 12:23 pm
Ken, do you think it makes sense to vaccinate 16-17 y/o children?
The FDA did not convene a board of experts, and made the decision unilaterally it would appear.
The FDA's own documentation shows that the risk of serious heart issues is equal to or greater than the risk of severe COVID
Yes, and my 15 year old daughter is vaccinated.
Vaccination campaigns serve two purposes: (1) to protect the individual, and (2) to curtail the spread of the disease to others. I will grant you that the risk of COVID hospitalization and death among teenagers is very low. Not zero, but very low. Although perhaps less low with omicron. Also the risk of side effects is very low. the rare instances of myocarditis you are referencing usually present with chest pain and shortness of breath but then quickly go away.
The table I provided shows hospitalizations due to myocarditis that were serious enough for the provider to report. These instances are in fact it would be very serious, and probably have long term implications, like not being to continue in athletics. the totals for general myocarditis would be much higher, but were not reported.
Ken wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 3:08 pm
So it isn't like they are dying of this side effect. Teenagers do not live in a vacuum.
You sure about that?
Ken wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 3:08 pm
They go to school where there are often elderly teachers as well as fellow students who may be immunocompromised or otherwise vulnerable. They live in families, often with elderly who may be vulnerable and immunocompromised. And if they do not, their fellow classmates do. So there is public health benefit to vaccinating all teenagers even if the disease had zero effect on teenagers. Simply to eliminate them as a disease vector. It is about pushing community spread of Covid down below a reproductive rate of 1.0 and vaccinating teenagers aids in that effort.
You realize you just made a case against vaccination. Your justifications for vaccination would be much better served by teenagers getting natural infections, quarantining once they show symptoms, and then recovering with much stronger, longer lasting immunity, and significantly less chance of spread, compared to vaccination.
So, they're not really at risk personally from COVID infections, the vaccine also doesn't prevent them from spreading COVID
at all, and the vaccine does have a little bit more risk than natural infection. I'm not seeing your rationale for vaccinating your 15 y/o at all.
Ken wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 3:08 pm
I'm not privy to the inner workings of the FDA and CDC when it comes to approvals. Both the FDA and CDC are full of in-house experts. I don't know anything about the circumstances regarding their decision not to convene outside advisory bodies to explore expanding vaccines to teenagers. One person's "cutting red tape" is another person's "unilateral decision making. We praised it when it was the Trump Administration cutting red tape with "operation warp speed" and the rapid approval of Hydroxychloroquine. Now we want to load back all the red tape I guess and slow things back down? It does appear that the Biden Administration and the FDA have been more aggressive at pushing boosters than the FDA advisory body was. With the advent of the omicron variant it looks like the Biden Administration was correct and the advisory body was wrong. But then 6 weeks ago no one had heard of omicron and now it is something like 70% of infections in the US.
Now you've lost me.
No, they are not full of in-house experts. They are full of bureaucrats. That's why they assemble key advisory panels to vote on these decisions.