I know some of you may not like the publisher of this article, but so be it. See if you can learn something.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/ ... s-00176182
I think they are, especially the interpreters. I have been there twice recently and twice as a teenager. They speak to you as people from the period 1775-1781. For reference, the Articles of Confederation were adopted by Congress in 1777 and finally ratified in 1781, the Constitution was not until 1791.
That's an impressive dedication to the portrayal of history.
We were there last year. The interpreters were world-class. Williamsburg is probably the gold standard of historical reenactment. But yeah, some things about the real colonial Williamsburg would probably have bothered you, so it is no surprise that the recreated version does as well.
I don't mind acknowledging messy history as long as it's not demeaning.mike wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 4:50 pmWe were there last year. The interpreters were world-class. Williamsburg is probably the gold standard of historical reenactment. But yeah, some things about the real colonial Williamsburg would probably have bothered you, so it is no surprise that the recreated version does as well.
For example the militarism and the opulence of the ruling class. Not to mention slavery.barnhart wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 5:18 pmI don't mind acknowledging messy history as long as it's not demeaning.mike wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 4:50 pmWe were there last year. The interpreters were world-class. Williamsburg is probably the gold standard of historical reenactment. But yeah, some things about the real colonial Williamsburg would probably have bothered you, so it is no surprise that the recreated version does as well.