i appreciate your comparison to weather forecasts.RZehr wrote: That’s okay. These health organizations, if they are doing their job correctly, they should be the ones taking the strongest possible position against diseases. That’s their job.
They need to warn people, and prudence would dictate that they convey the serious potential of these. They shouldn’t take the optimistic lackadaisical route, that would be irresponsible in the extreme.
It’s the same with storm forecasters.
They usually end up over estimating the danger and power of these storms, because they want people to know the threats be aware of the possibilities, and take action for safety.
They aren’t trying to make a actual prediction, but rather possibilities.
I’m making a prediction. I don’t disagree with their possibilities.
These organizations goal is not precise accuracy because the consequences of over vs under estimating are so different. Lose your job and people die if it’s bigger vs nothing if it’s smaller.
I wouldn’t want the WHO and the health industry to take my position.
If they did, we would have a disaster.
My prediction of this being overblown is taking into account government and scientists and health organizations and heath workers taking this head on and throwing every effort at combating this.
My prediction is really a prediction of confidence in them being successful.
And the weather becoming warmer will help.
i think of pandemics much like other natural events/disasters.
a lot of it is attempting to IDENTIFY, PREVENT, RESPOND TO, a lot that is unknown.
politicizing is bad, it seems inevitable, in our current times.
thing is, those strictly politicizing may find themselves in just such a HOT SEAT in future,
then very much want cooperation and grace.
“Prepare for the worst, Hope for the best.”