The Nicene Creed

General Christian Theology
Valerie

Re: The Nicene Creed

Post by Valerie »

KingdomBuilder wrote:Valerie, what translation are you using?

Higher quality translations render "divisions" and/or "sects"... Not "heresies".
My Scriptures of choice the last several years is The Orthodox Study Bible- it uses the Septuagint Old Testament & New King James New Testament,- the definition of heresies would agree with causing divisions & sectd- so either eay- it is sin
0 x
Josh

Re: The Nicene Creed

Post by Josh »

Valerie wrote:
KingdomBuilder wrote:Valerie, what translation are you using?

Higher quality translations render "divisions" and/or "sects"... Not "heresies".
My Scriptures of choice the last several years is The Orthodox Study Bible- it uses the Septuagint Old Testament & New King James New Testament,- the definition of heresies would agree with causing divisions & sectd- so either eay- it is sin
The term in 2018 does not mean what it did in 1611. “Divisions” is a much better term than “heresies”.
0 x
KingdomBuilder

Re: The Nicene Creed

Post by KingdomBuilder »

So any non-homogenized area of Christianity is sin?
Or is it not the lack f homogeneity that's sin, but the binding and divisive spirit that it leads to in some.... :?
0 x
Josh

Re: The Nicene Creed

Post by Josh »

KingdomBuilder wrote:So any non-homogenized area of Christianity is sin?
Or is it not the lack f homogeneity that's sin, but the binding and divisive spirit that it leads to in some.... :?
Then the big question is which side of 1054 is in heresy and sin: the East side, or the West side?

And then more questions after that: in 1525, were the Anabaptists are the Catholics the one in sin? (I would side with the Anabaptists, since they were the ones being killed, whereas the Catholics were killing people simply for choosing to be baptised as adults.)
0 x
Post Reply