My Scriptures of choice the last several years is The Orthodox Study Bible- it uses the Septuagint Old Testament & New King James New Testament,- the definition of heresies would agree with causing divisions & sectd- so either eay- it is sinKingdomBuilder wrote:Valerie, what translation are you using?
Higher quality translations render "divisions" and/or "sects"... Not "heresies".
The Nicene Creed
-
Valerie
Re: The Nicene Creed
0 x
-
Josh
Re: The Nicene Creed
The term in 2018 does not mean what it did in 1611. “Divisions” is a much better term than “heresies”.Valerie wrote:My Scriptures of choice the last several years is The Orthodox Study Bible- it uses the Septuagint Old Testament & New King James New Testament,- the definition of heresies would agree with causing divisions & sectd- so either eay- it is sinKingdomBuilder wrote:Valerie, what translation are you using?
Higher quality translations render "divisions" and/or "sects"... Not "heresies".
0 x
-
KingdomBuilder
Re: The Nicene Creed
So any non-homogenized area of Christianity is sin?
Or is it not the lack f homogeneity that's sin, but the binding and divisive spirit that it leads to in some....
Or is it not the lack f homogeneity that's sin, but the binding and divisive spirit that it leads to in some....
0 x
-
Josh
Re: The Nicene Creed
Then the big question is which side of 1054 is in heresy and sin: the East side, or the West side?KingdomBuilder wrote:So any non-homogenized area of Christianity is sin?
Or is it not the lack f homogeneity that's sin, but the binding and divisive spirit that it leads to in some....
And then more questions after that: in 1525, were the Anabaptists are the Catholics the one in sin? (I would side with the Anabaptists, since they were the ones being killed, whereas the Catholics were killing people simply for choosing to be baptised as adults.)
0 x