JayP wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2026 12:48 pm
Respectfully, I do not agree a out the last several statements about Eastern.
Strings are far from extinct. Obviously “strings” is a lengthy long conversation.
Does Epmc in general identify with jo strings? Yes. In a sense they always have. Equally, they have a lot of folks from settings or family ties outside Eastern where it matters, so in some places some wear strings.
Black cars? The majority of members have black cars. I would like proof ministers dress differently. Not wearing the plain suit for church has always been frowned upon. Do they expect ministry to tightly uphold the standards. Yes.
Frock coat vs. clerical coat - EPMC ministry is expected to wear the frock coat, I don't think many of the laity wear the frock coat. This, to be sure, is not something that originated with EPMC. The expectation for the ordained to wear the frock coat factored largely in the John H. Oberholtzer division in 1847(?). My impression based on various old photos is that the regulation coat worn by conservative Mennonite laity of the 21st century is more similar to the frock coat worn by the ordained brethren than were their counterparts of the 19th century.
Covering strings - as you mentioned, it varies by congregation. A minister's wife is expected to wear covering strings while it might be optional for other women in the congregation with rate of use dependent on a variety of factors
Plain hat - for men, similar to the covering string situation for women. Some congregations/districts there would be a very strong pressure for wearing the plain hat, others would lean more toward "if you're going to wear a hat or cap for formal occasions, it must be a plain hat."
Black cars - you can't tell who is ordained based on their car. A high percentage of the vehicles driven by the laity are fully in compliance with anything that might be expected of the ministry.