Wife: they have blood tests for food and environmental allergies. They’re not going to do a skin test on someone who might have an anaphylactic reaction to something so maybe that’s what you’re talking about. The skin test though are less likely to come up with false positives, but one of our children tested pretty high for dust mites and ragweed, and very minor for milk and scallops (blood test from doctors office), which it’s possible they might be slightly sensitive to milk, but we didn’t drop it, and it seems like the symptoms were more environmental for that one. I’m sure it would be different if milk ended up testing a lot higher.JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Dec 23, 2025 11:04 amI'd like to learn more, since my allergist told me it's not medically possible to test for food allergies. Could you share some more information about this?JohnL wrote: ↑Mon Dec 22, 2025 11:59 pm Well now it took us 4 tries to find a dr that wasn’t prescription happy. We eventually had to drive close to 50 miles to find this osteopathic medicine dr. He ran allergy tests to see if she was allergic to foods and it happened she was so all she had to do was stop eating them and her GI pains disappeared. He couldn’t get rid of her biggest pain though… me.![]()
In my area, DOs are quite common, practice at all the major hospital networks, and seem to practice medicine the same way that MDs do. My family's doctor is a DO.
The allergist we talked to said that they do blood tests for people with higher risk of anaphylactic reactions. They also said not to worry about the milk because the child’s numbers were low enough that it might not actually be a big deal