Church Discipline

Christian ethics and theology with an Anabaptist perspective
Bootstrap
Posts: 3828
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 3:38 pm
Affiliation: Virginia Conference

Re: Church Discipline

Post by Bootstrap »

JohnH wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 8:29 am
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 7:56 am
JohnH wrote: ↑Sun Oct 12, 2025 4:52 pm No one should ever submit to spiritual abuse.
How are you defining spiritual abuse here?

Asking people not to post potentially inflammatory things on Twitter/X is spiritual abuse?
Excommunicating someone for having a reasonable political opinion that happens to be one church leadership disagrees with is spiritual abuse, in my opinion, particularly when that church hasn't stated upfront what political opinions it expects its members to have.
As far as I can tell, there's no reason at all to believe that's what happened here. Even The Blaze article didn't make that claim. Whenever we point out the man's behavior, you reframe it as though the real issue is that he had a political opinion. Every terrorist has political opinions, that doesn't mean terrorism isn't a bad thing.

And somehow, political opinions seem to have a special status for you. Some political opinions, I think, go directly against biblical teaching. Does the church have a right, for instance, to take a stand on gay marriage that disagrees with political opinions that some people hold?
0 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
Soloist
Posts: 2107
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:24 am
Affiliation: CM Seeker

Re: Church Discipline

Post by Soloist »

JohnH wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 8:42 am
At the same time, generally speaking, breaking an unwritten rule doesn't result in summary formal church discipline.
The mustache and medical insurance were the two specific ones I was referring to and both were tests of membership.
0 x
Soloist
Posts: 2107
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:24 am
Affiliation: CM Seeker

Re: Church Discipline

Post by Soloist »

JohnH wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 8:42 am
That's certainly true and that's a pretty valid criticism of certain types of churches...which is exactly what I criticized here. What is bizarre to me is to see anyone defending a church excommunicating people for holding mainstream political views.
I’m not defending either side. Just pointing out this is normal behavior from back when I was in those circles.
0 x
JohnH
Posts: 9510
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: Church Discipline

Post by JohnH »

Bootstrap wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 8:46 am As far as I can tell, there's no reason at all to believe that's what happened here. Even The Blaze article didn't make that claim. Whenever we point out the man's behavior, you reframe it as though the real issue is that he had a political opinion. Every terrorist has political opinions, that doesn't mean terrorism isn't a bad thing.
... ? I think equating this guy to a terrorist is a bit of a leap.
And somehow, political opinions seem to have a special status for you. Some political opinions, I think, go directly against biblical teaching. Does the church have a right, for instance, to take a stand on gay marriage that disagrees with political opinions that some people hold?
I think it's reasonable for people to have varying political opinions about the laws surrounding gay marriage. Same with abortion. For example, I don't think that passing laws against gay marriage right now is a good idea, or would be a very good and effective Christian witness for us to be supporting.

I don't think a church that takes a stance against homosexual acts should excommunicate people for having the political opinion I expressed above.
0 x
Bootstrap
Posts: 3828
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 3:38 pm
Affiliation: Virginia Conference

Re: Church Discipline

Post by Bootstrap »

JohnH wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 9:00 am
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 8:46 am As far as I can tell, there's no reason at all to believe that's what happened here. Even The Blaze article didn't make that claim. Whenever we point out the man's behavior, you reframe it as though the real issue is that he had a political opinion. Every terrorist has political opinions, that doesn't mean terrorism isn't a bad thing.
... ? I think equating this guy to a terrorist is a bit of a leap.
Indeed. And I didn't do that.

Let me spell out the logic carefully: Just as having a political opinion does not justify terrorism, having a political opinion does not justify the toxic media soup or the toxic Twitter/X soup. Stirring up enmity against other people is not good even if it is motivated by a political opionion.
JohnH wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 9:00 am
And somehow, political opinions seem to have a special status for you. Some political opinions, I think, go directly against biblical teaching. Does the church have a right, for instance, to take a stand on gay marriage that disagrees with political opinions that some people hold?
I think it's reasonable for people to have varying political opinions about the laws surrounding gay marriage. Same with abortion. For example, I don't think that passing laws against gay marriage right now is a good idea, or would be a very good and effective Christian witness for us to be supporting.

I don't think a church that takes a stance against homosexual acts should excommunicate people for having the political opinion I expressed above.
But despite my church's biblical stance on gay marriage, if someone made a video of some gay people, put it on Twitter, and said "these people are gay, they don't belong here", we would consider that kind of behavior bad.

That seems similar to what this man did. Nobody except you is talking about "having an opinion", we are talking about behavior, what you do, whether or not it is motivated by a political opinion.

If we did that, do you think the Twitter/X guy should take us to The Blaze?
1 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
JohnH
Posts: 9510
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: Church Discipline

Post by JohnH »

Bootstrap wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 9:03 am Indeed. And I didn't do that. Just as having a political opinion does not justify terrorism, having a political opinion does not justify the toxic media soup or the toxic Twitter/X soup. Stirring up enmity against other people is not good even if it is motivated by a political opionion.
I don't think he was "stirring up enmity against other people", and in case, I don't think his church had some kind of moral stance that its members must not participate on Twitter or participate in political discussions there.
But despite my church's biblical stance on gay marriage, if someone made a video of some gay people, put it on Twitter, and said "these people are gay, they don't belong here", we would consider that kind of behavior bad.

That seems similar to what this man did.
No, what he said was that he'd like his children to grow up in America, not India. I think that's a reasonable expectation. If people want to live in India, they can go live in India. I think it's acceptable to have differing political opinions about Indian assimilation (or lack thereof) in America.

For example, I have personally witnessed very poor assimilation in America of Indians who retain a lot of their old ways with regard to the caste system. I've had to be personally involved in dealing with workplace discrimination against people of a lower caste. It's very ugly and it's frankly something I don't think belongs here, and I make no apologies at all when I say that very integral aspect of Indian culture does not belong here.
0 x
User avatar
Praxis+Theodicy
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2023 12:24 pm
Location: Queensbury, NY
Affiliation: Seeker

Re: Church Discipline

Post by Praxis+Theodicy »

JohnH wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 9:06 am No, what he said was that he'd like his children to grow up in America, not India. I think that's a reasonable expectation. If people want to live in India, they can go live in India. I think it's acceptable to have differing political opinions about Indian assimilation (or lack thereof) in America.
He did say that, indeed. But that has nothing at ALL to do with h1-B Visas, which he also said in the same post. Since you seem to know his intentions, maybe you can draw the line connecting the two things. Afterall, H1-B visas allow Indians to live here, which is an entirely different reality from his children living in India. He is either insane, and he is saying something that doesn't line up with reality, or he is inferring something else.

Perhaps what he means to say is "I don't want my kids growing up in close proximity to anyone who has anything to do with India"? I'm not sure, but that seems like the only way I can understand it having any coherent meaning. It's the closest thing I can think of that would actually have some semblance of logical connection to H1-B visas.

I do not know the man, so I cannot judge where he falls on the scale of "clear-minded" to "detached from reality." There is an old phrase, "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". Perhaps this man's intentions were not truly as malicious and evil-hearted as they appeared. Perhaps he truly is detached from reality, and whenever he sees someone with a foreign accent, he believes he (and his children) have been magically transported across the world to a place with entirely different laws, customs, culture, currency, etc.

And this of course informs whether discipleship or discipline is needed from his church. Both terms refer to the same thing, of exhortation to the Christian to be more Christlike. The church does need to handle that very carefully. If someone in our church believed the earth was flat, I hope we'd treat that differently than someone who publicly proclaimed that all Jews were evil or something. Both might be a bit detached from reality, but if it is merely a case of incredible ignorance, "church discipline" might not be the best course of action.
1 x
The Bible is very easy to understand. But we Christians are a bunch of scheming swindlers. We pretend to be unable to understand it because we know very well that the minute we understand we are obliged to act accordingly.
-Søren Kierkegaard
JohnH
Posts: 9510
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: Church Discipline

Post by JohnH »

Praxis+Theodicy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 14, 2025 12:50 pmHe did say that, indeed. But that has nothing at ALL to do with h1-B Visas, which he also said in the same post. Since you seem to know his intentions, maybe you can draw the line connecting the two things. Afterall, H1-B visas allow Indians to live here, which is an entirely different reality from his children living in India. He is either insane, and he is saying something that doesn't line up with reality, or he is inferring something else.
If a place becomes composed of Indians on nonimmigrant visas, i.e., a visa where one signs a declaration they have strong ties to their home country and intend to return, then in all reality it becomes something like a colony or a settlement of India.

For a comparision, suppose a depressed, backwater town has a large amount of Amish who move in. Formerly, the town was composed of Catholic people and had a small parish, people retired there, there weren't too many jobs but the ones that did exist were staffed by locals.

The Amish move in, open businesses, buy out existing ones and the owners retire, and tend to hire their own Amish people to work in them. They don't attend the Catholic church but have their own churches. Their culture takes over and predominates. It is safe to say it is no longer a "Catholic" town, but is now an Amish town. And it would be ridiculous to claim anything other would happen; if the Amish move in to an area, they don't "assimilate". Pennsylvania Dutch becomes the prevailing language. If you are one of the natives of that town, you won't understand the conversations of others, your neighbours, or what you hear at the local diner.

Indians don't assimilate either, generally speaking. They bring their culture, languages, and customs with them, for good or for bad. They show up, fund their own temples, hire each other, and generally form their own cultural enclaves.

I think it is reasonable for people to feel uncomfortable when they feel displaced and not want to be replaced, whether by Amish people or by Indians or by anyone else.
Perhaps what he means to say is "I don't want my kids growing up in close proximity to anyone who has anything to do with India"?
He didn't say that, so that isn't what he meant.
I'm not sure, but that seems like the only way I can understand it having any coherent meaning. It's the closest thing I can think of that would actually have some semblance of logical connection to H1-B visas.

I do not know the man, so I cannot judge where he falls on the scale of "clear-minded" to "detached from reality." There is an old phrase, "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". Perhaps this man's intentions were not truly as malicious and evil-hearted as they appeared. Perhaps he truly is detached from reality, and whenever he sees someone with a foreign accent, he believes he (and his children) have been magically transported across the world to a place with entirely different laws, customs, culture, currency, etc.
His original point of frustration was having his own local street taken over by a street observing some festival related to a pagan holiday. It's not like as a Christian he can go and participate in their pagan festival in any meaningful way. (If it were me, I would be finding tracts in Hindi or Tamil or whatever and passing them out to local people, but that's just me.) Most people (about 97%) are not very interested in assimilating to other cultures or learning more about foreign cultures. 3% of people (such as myself) are. It is important we respect the 97% of people who would prefer to only associated with their own kind, often delineated by language, ethnic group, or religious leaning.
I think he was simply frustrated that he finds himself living in a neighbourhood composed of people who speak their own language,
Yes. Is that unreasonable? I think it's fine to want to grow up in a place where people speak and share a common language.
And this of course informs whether discipleship or discipline is needed from his church. Both terms refer to the same thing, of exhortation to the Christian to be more Christlike. The church does need to handle that very carefully. If someone in our church believed the earth was flat, I hope we'd treat that differently than someone who publicly proclaimed that all Jews were evil or something. Both might be a bit detached from reality, but if it is merely a case of incredible ignorance, "church discipline" might not be the best course of action.
Let's put the shoe on the other foot.

There is a town or a region in India. It was formerly composed of a group of people, let's say, Telegus. For whatever reason, the large, trans-national Indian supergovernment has decided to open it up to development from foreigners. Large swaths of Amish, Mennonite, and Baptist settlers start coming in, along with a handful of Albanian Muslims too. They are well-funded and seem to be connected with a few multinational employers who used to provide a lot of the local jobs. It used to be a farming community, but due to poor commodity prices most of the local people have been reduced to just renting their farm land out and then working for one of the big corporations.

The Amish and others who show up are able to start renting or even buying out right this land. They also start popping up first in the local jobs, and then in management positions working for the multinational companies too. A few local businesses start to be sold, too, including the convenience store that was known to always offer a widow on hard times a spot to sell some food items to make a bit of extra money, and the gas station that would always hire teenagers as cashiers. The Albanians buy that one, and don't allow other vendors on their property anymore. They are thrifty, and convert the back part of the store into an apartment and their extended family lives there and takes turns working the shifts so the station can be open longer.

The Baptists take over the convenience store, and stop selling alcohol and cigarettes, and expand the food options - except they don't let anyone else set up a little food stall anymore. Instead they sell mass produced options and start catering to a more "upscale" clientele. Somehow, they get a government grant intended for "impoverished" areas to help start small businesses, but they used this loan to buy out the convenience store from the former owner, who was deeply in debt and willing to take a deal for below market value. After securing this loan, the Baptist family uses the revenue from the store to leverage their way into more loans and keeps buying out more similar stores like that in the region. They keep acquiring employment based visas to fly in more of their cousins, relatives, and even people from other Baptist churches in the part of Texas they're from and set them up with housing and jobs.

The Amish people are eager to find good land, and find a lot of the land has been under-utilized. They rent some of it but also start making cash offers, and some of the families who have held the land for generations decide to accept. Nobody is quite sure how, but the Amish seem to have unlimited amounts of cash, and when there is an auction for a family where the main breadwinner died and there were unable to pay the relevant taxes, the Amish outbid everyone else, including one of the wealthier local Telugu families. People are shocked, and the bulk of the money goes to the loan sharks and the government. The tax rate goes up, and the local government is happy because the tax based is expanding - and the Amish always seem to be able to pay their taxes on time.

They start farming it, and the workers all seem to be Amish now, with a few Mennonite workers scattered in and Telugus only hired for the lowest-paying jobs - if at all. An old custom of allowing workers to plant their own small patch on the fringes of the fields or the least desirable parts is no longer allowed. Some of it is converted to pasture for beef cattle, which makes the Telugu people in their Hindu religion feel very uncomfortable.

The press describes this all as "progress" and praises the Amish, Menonnites, Baptists, and Albanians for bringing economic progress to the region. There is some political controversy about whether to grant even more work visas, but both local and multinational employers insist there is actually a worker shortage, and that local Telugu workers "don't want to work". They are described as lazy, or drug-addicted, or only wanting to sit around playing on gambling apps on their phones all day.

A shiny new mosque is built by the Albanians on the ground of what used to be a Hindu temple which fell into disrepair. There is anti-proselytization law, but the Albanians, Amish, and Mennonites don't seem to really want anyone else to ever see their religious services anyway or invite anyone to attend. Some of the Baptists have a church service on Saturday evenings in the Telugu language, but everything else including on Sundays is conducted in English. In this backwater part of A.P., most people don't learn English in school. The Amish and Mennonites speak Pennsylvania Dutch and use German at their church services.

The birth rate in A.P. has been declining, down to a TFR of 1.5 average births per woman, and there is a lot in the media about how the declining birth rate means it's important to accept immigrants. The Amish do seem to move in and have large families, and so do the Albanians. It becomes more and more common to see a woman in a kapp pushing a stroller with two babies in it.

The price of housing just keeps going up and up, as more and more people move in who can afford to buy or rent - pushing the native people farther and farther out to the margins. It doesn't help that the Amish are willing to live in a small 3 bedroom farmhouse with 7 or 8 kids, sharing rooms; the Albanians will set up little apartments in the back of the gas stations; the Baptists build dormitories with bunk beds. They save wealth this way. But the native people talk about how there used to be a time when most young families could afford a house with an extra room, but that's not possible anymore. The local press praises the thriftiness of the migrants, such as the Baptist young families who are willing to have 2 young couples share a 2 bedroom flat.

Some of the Baptists and Mennonites get mixed up in politics, even. A few have acquired permanent Indian citizenship, and run for office. It seems odd they would run for offices with the BJP party, which is allegedly Hindu-nationalist, but at the same time, they are praised for the amount of capital and jobs they bring into the country. Eventually, names like Kauffman, Jones, and Hoxhaj start to show up in places like regional councils and school boards. It seems government jobs (which always had a reputation for a bit of nepotism) are likewise going to people with names like Miller, Johnson, and Prifti.

Spending initiatives from the government start to get redirected; some people want to ask why there is so much government money being spent on loans to build more gas stations, but they just keep popping up. Schools start to have sections on Amish and Alabanian history, some of which feel may be rather romanticized and leave out important historical details. The BJP party praises this as part of their dedication to India's minority cultures, and is rewarded with the new migrants' extensive fundraising and get-out-the-vote campaigns. The Telugus used to feel confident supporting the BJP, the regional TDP being in a comfortable alliance with it. Now, there are signs of that fracturing. But the only other option is the Communist party sort of alliance, which many of the locals don't feel comfortable with because of some of their more extreme ideology.

As time goes on, the percentage of the population that is foreign-born or has a foreign-born parent increases; the distribution of wealth becomes so skewed that the wealthiest racial group is now white people, much as the wealthiest racial group in America is Asian (including Indian) people.

Amid all this, someone in a formerly Telugu rural area takes a video of an Amish barn party, complete with the drunkenness and questionable conduct they are known for. "I want my kids to grow up in India, not Holmes County," is the caption.

The end.
0 x
User avatar
Praxis+Theodicy
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2023 12:24 pm
Location: Queensbury, NY
Affiliation: Seeker

Re: Church Discipline

Post by Praxis+Theodicy »

If you're trying to be convincing, you aren't helping your case. You thought painting a horror story about increasing numbers of Amish in kapps is the most scary thing imaginable... on an anabaptist forum? Where church services are offered in a region that previously had not a chance to hear the gospel? Of course you pepper in other details that have I'll effects, too so yes, horror story achieved.

But look

You spent an inordinate amount of time writing up a fiction you were in complete control of. That's not an argument any more than if I were to sit and write out the history of a flat earth in order to disprove the sphere-pushers. Writing out a fictional story doesn't argue for anything. It can be persuasive, but it's not an argument. If you want to argue something, you're not. If you want to persuade, you're doing it in the wrong place. Your point of view, when taken to its logical conclusion, would see Amish people suffer a genocide. Simple as. In fact, anyone who "refuses to acculturate" and speaks another language is what is wrong in the scenario you paint. Anyone that doesn't have an easy to place to "go back to" would be in grave danger under this mindset. Natives in the America would be sent to schools as children in order to wash away their culture (oh wait, that's already happened). Muslims would be sent to re-education camps (oh wait, that's already happening in China). Jews would be rounded up, identified, and put under strict laws, as would other unaculterated diaspora like the Amish, Romani, and Hutterites (I swear something like this has happened before, I can't place my finger on it).
Most people (about 97%) are not very interested in assimilating to other cultures or learning more about foreign cultures. 3% of people (such as myself) are. It is important we respect the 97% of people who would prefer to only associated with their own kind, often delineated by language, ethnic group, or religious leaning.
Your premise rests on the fact that we need to bow down to the people that want to never have the chance to see or hear from anyone around them who is of a different culture than them. I reject that principle on Christian grounds. It doesn't matter if "97%" of people feel that way. Jesus feels the other way, and it could be "100%" and I still wouldn't care. Let God be true and 100% of men be liars. I. Do. Not. Care. Giving in to the most disgusting, anti-Christian opinions of "the majority" is the ideology of secular liberalism and I reject it outright. let Christ be true and those 97% of men be blasphemous God-haters. I don't care.

Paul and the apostles fought HARD to make sure the church didn't give in to this toxic idea in the early church. When Peter started placating them, Paul called him out. Peter stood condemned by giving in to the idea of separating cultures, of the spirit that those "97%" of people carry. Yes, this exists in the world but it must not be tolerated in the church. And that is where the whole conversation stems. If you are right in your interpretation, then the man in question needed to be put through church discipline. The New Testament testifies to it. Let God be true and his Word be trustworthy.
6 x
The Bible is very easy to understand. But we Christians are a bunch of scheming swindlers. We pretend to be unable to understand it because we know very well that the minute we understand we are obliged to act accordingly.
-Søren Kierkegaard
ohio jones
Posts: 2346
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:03 pm
Affiliation: Rosedale Network

Re: Church Discipline

Post by ohio jones »

JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Oct 14, 2025 2:48 pm I think it is reasonable for people to feel uncomfortable when they feel displaced and not want to be replaced, whether by Amish people or by Indians or by anyone else.
Even a curmudgeonly xenophobe like Walt Kowalski can learn to overcome that.
1 x
Post Reply