JohnH wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 6:53 am
Jazman wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 6:50 am
Even though this gentleman isn't an Anabaptist/Menno, (at least I don't think so), I thought his
analysis of the so-called "gospel" message given at the memorial to be helpful and also echoed the concerns of the two writers shared at the beginning of this op. He may be overly strident for some tastes, (at one point using the F__st word) but I think his overall approach of comparing the Biblical, Jesus Gospel with the ok-sounding but slightly twisted version at the memorial; is something we should consider if we truly want to follow Jesus and
His Way of doing things and
His Way of bringing
His kingdom into more fullness on earth as it is in heaven.
So, Jazman, is it okay for anyone other than plain Anabaptists to share the gospel message?
Because nearly every other sect thinks political messaging alongside the gospel is okay… as long as it’s politics they agree with.
The real question is this: Is the gospel they preach the gospel of Jesus, or does it replace His kingdom with another? I don't think plain Anabaptists are the only people who ask this question, and I don't think we need to "grade on a curve". This is really the whole point of Two Kingdom theology. And the Good News, as we understand it, is not praying a prayer to check the box and get eternal salvation, it is the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.
Historically, many branches of Christianity have been cautious about mixing political messaging with the Gospel. The early church often understood the Good News as an alternative to political power, not something to be blended with it.
That caution was especially strong when political language started to sound like worship language. Whenever loyalty to rulers or nations was lifted up in ways that resembled devotion to God, Christians warned that this was dangerous. Many branches of the church still teach this today. You don’t have to be Anabaptist to hear warnings about tying the Good News too tightly to earthly politics. Catholic, Orthodox, and many Protestant voices say the same.
If it is the Gospel of Jesus, it is the Gospel of the Kingdom of God. Does it proclaim Christ’s reign, or does it substitute another kingdom in its place?
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.