Thanks, I'll give it a try. Sorry for the thread interruption.ohio jones wrote: ↑Wed Dec 21, 2022 4:41 pmAt the top of the page, next to the Post Reply button, there's a wrench icon with a drop-down menu; one of the choices is Subscribe topic. If it says Unsubscribe, you have (perhaps unintentionally) signed up for notifications from the thread, and clicking on Unsubscribe should stop them.
If that's not the cause, I have no idea. But it does give me an idea if I actually do want to be hostile sometime.![]()
Can we make MN more hostile?
-
Sudsy
Re: Can we make MN more hostile?
0 x
Re: Can we make MN more hostile?

3 x
Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
-
Soloist
Re: Can we make MN more hostile?
Very sad, I would agree though. We will be judged by our words.
2 x
-
temporal1
Re: Can we make MN more hostile?
words, yes. but, i think moreso, intent.
God knows our hearts. He cannot be fooled. Jesus is territorial about who will judge.
unfortunately, some have the gift of fine words without hearts to match.
God knows.
0 x
2025 Re: Can we make MN more hostile?
2025 / Memories ..
now i forgot what i was searching for.
- o.yeah. trolls.
there is an old thread or two on trolls. maybe later. RL calls.
now i forgot what i was searching for.
there is an old thread or two on trolls. maybe later. RL calls.
GaryK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 9:50 amMight be a good way to get rid of the fleas in the armpits you so generously supplied.mike wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 9:35 amThis should do the trick. I wonder if this would be a good way to drive trolls off the forumPelerin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 8:51 am
I was actually trying to make the text itself flash, as in the annoying staple design element of late-90s/early-00s websites. I thought about it partway through that the [flash] tag was probably intended for Flash as in the uh, other annoying staple design element of late-90s/early-00s websites. But in a thread like this I wasn't about to let a little thing like the facts get in the way of making unfair insinuations against the powers that be.
![]()
![]()
![]()
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
2026 Re: Can we make MN more hostile?
2026
OP / 2022:
i guess we can “make MN more hostile” .. briar patch is busy right now.
https://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.ph ... &start=760
Robert sure left us good stuff to remember.
OP / 2022:
2025:ohio jones wrote: ↑Wed Dec 21, 2022 11:03 am Since many of the posts in the other thread seem to be doing the exact opposite of what that thread's title asks, maybe we could try that same strategy here.
Who wants to be first?
To be clear, any posts in this thread exhibiting a hint of hostility run the risk of being moved or deleted.
i guess we can “make MN more hostile” .. briar patch is busy right now.
https://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.ph ... &start=760
Robert sure left us good stuff to remember.
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
Re: Can we make MN more hostile?
if memory serves, i think the briar patch was justme’s brainchild?
and Sunbeam’s Whine Line .. ?
.. there’s a history ..
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz