Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Christian ethics and theology with an Anabaptist perspective
silentreader

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by silentreader »

Josh wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 9:41 am
silentreader wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 9:17 am
Josh wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 9:13 am

No person can “find” salvation on their own, and salvation is not a result of mental assent.

Jesus can choose to save anyone for any reason and by any means he wishes.
You won't answer the question, will you? I wonder why.
I just did, but I think you’re trying to impose a fundamentalist & systematic-theology paradigm, and I don’t exegete nor practice in that paradigm.

Here’s a better question: is everyone who believe Jesus rose going to heaven?

Also, if you’d like to get at something, just say it. No need for “I wonder why.” Say what you’re thinking.
If you don't "exegete" and "practice" in "that paradigm" then you should be able to answer a simple question with a simple answer.
And I do actually wonder why you won't.
0 x
silentreader

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by silentreader »

Ernie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 8:15 am
silentreader wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:08 pm
Ernie wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:20 pm
If a person refuses to believe that Jesus died, was buried, and rose again, I don't expect such a person to have eternal life.

But it wouldn't surprise me if people who aren't aware of this ancient happening (during the time they are living on this earth) are given eternal life. It happened for the OT saints, and therefore it does not seem to me to be outside of the character of God to do it for people today. I wouldn't encourage anyone to bank on this and try to stay ignorant as that is basically the same as refusing to believe that Jesus rose.
Interesting. So why evangelize, or disciple, if you prefer, if people would be better off not knowing and thus not being put at risk of making the wrong choice?
I do not know whether God gives all people a chance to hear the Gospel in this life or in the life to come. I'm just saying that it would not surprise me, and it would not be out of character for Him to do something like this, based on what he did between his death and resurrection.
But regardless of that, ignorance is not bliss. If a person makes the wrong choice in this life, they may also make the wrong choice should they have a chance in the life to come. It appears that not everybody in Hades heard and responded to the Gospel when Jesus came and preached to them (e.g. the rich man Dives). We don't know whether Dives did not hear the Gospel, whether he heard but did not respond favorably, or whether he heard but was not given the choice to respond, based on the choices he made in this life.
We do know that God wants people to believe, repent, and walk in newness of life in this life, so that is why we evangelize and make disciples.

Ignorance about God and His reality is not something that benefits anyone, whether in this life or the life to come. So, one of the reasons for evangelism and disciple-making is to help people understand reality and begin fulfilling the purpose for why they were created. Embracing reality includes believing in Jesus and in his death, burial, and resurrection.
We thrive whenever we embrace reality and begin embracing the purpose for our creation. I want to see everyone in the world, thrive!
I probably agree with the majority of what you have written over the years, but every once in a while you come up with things that....scare me.
0 x
silentreader

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by silentreader »

barnhart wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:47 am
silentreader wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:06 pm
I still think you need to spend time in Hebrews. Chapter 9 maybe.
How about chapter 11 where it says the great heroes of faith died looking forward to the promise. Just as we look back. The difference is the opportunity to live a life of spirit filled faith in the kingdom in this life, not the eternal destination.
Very good point.
0 x
Ernie

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by Ernie »

silentreader wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:01 amI probably agree with the majority of what you have written over the years, but every once in a while you come up with things that....scare me.
How does this scare you?
0 x
Neto

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by Neto »

Ernie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 8:15 am
silentreader wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:08 pm
Ernie wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:20 pm
If a person refuses to believe that Jesus died, was buried, and rose again, I don't expect such a person to have eternal life.

But it wouldn't surprise me if people who aren't aware of this ancient happening (during the time they are living on this earth) are given eternal life. It happened for the OT saints, and therefore it does not seem to me to be outside of the character of God to do it for people today. I wouldn't encourage anyone to bank on this and try to stay ignorant as that is basically the same as refusing to believe that Jesus rose.
Interesting. So why evangelize, or disciple, if you prefer, if people would be better off not knowing and thus not being put at risk of making the wrong choice?
I do not know whether God gives all people a chance to hear the Gospel in this life or in the life to come. I'm just saying that it would not surprise me, and it would not be out of character for Him to do something like this, based on what he did between his death and resurrection.
But regardless of that, ignorance is not bliss. If a person makes the wrong choice in this life, they may also make the wrong choice should they have a chance in the life to come. It appears that not everybody in Hades heard and responded to the Gospel when Jesus came and preached to them (e.g. the rich man Dives). We don't know whether Dives did not hear the Gospel, whether he heard but did not respond favorably, or whether he heard but was not given the choice to respond, based on the choices he made in this life.
We do know that God wants people to believe, repent, and walk in newness of life in this life, so that is why we evangelize and make disciples.

Ignorance about God and His reality is not something that benefits anyone, whether in this life or the life to come. So, one of the reasons for evangelism and disciple-making is to help people understand reality and begin fulfilling the purpose for why they were created. Embracing reality includes believing in Jesus and in his death, burial, and resurrection.
We thrive whenever we embrace reality and begin embracing the purpose for our creation. I want to see everyone in the world, thrive!
At this point, this discussion touches on the relative seriousness of pioneer missionary efforts (spreading the Gospel to places where the people haven't heard, nor have had opportunity to hear). "How shall they believe unless they hear?"

Yes, the basic reason for telling the Good News is because 1.) It really IS good news. 2.) This is what *we* are commanded to do. (I personally understand the command to be for all Christians, not just the original Disciples, and not just the 'church' as an institution. But whether a command to each follower of Christ, only the leadership, or the church as the Body of Christ, that can be a separate discussion. Whether the *we* is each individual or the collective group, the command stands - this is what is to be done.)

You (Ernie) already answered this question, but I'll state it for the sake of other readers. Do 'you' think that a person who has never heard the Gospel will be more likely, or less likely to believe in this life, or in the afterlife (if offered such an opportunity)? (Personally, if I believed that there will be another opportunity, recognizing that God could explain the Gospel MUCH better than I, I would be reluctant to tell anyone here. If they have a better chance later, then I am condemning them to hell if I tell them, perhaps poorly, and they do not believe. At that point, see my last paragraph below, for another question.)

Last week I was at a new customer's house, and the subject of our previous occupation came up. I mentioned a certain Banawa man, Yowaki (or, translated, 'Squirrel'), and told how his death early in our time there was one of the saddest most disturbing experiences I have had - because he was one of the most monolingual speakers of the tribe, and I didn't yet speak Banawa, so I had not had any way to have told him the Gospel. He passed away without having the opportunity to believe. I started to tell about him to the Amishman (who turned out to be a minister), and I could barely finish the story, because I broke down and began weeping. (If you need to know, I'm crying now, too.) Yowaki died without Christ, without any opportunity to hear or believe the Gospel. Whose 'fault' is that? Who was told - SENT - maybe even decades or a century or more before us, but didn't obey? We CANNOT just think, Oh, well, God will surely give them an opportunity at the last judgement, so it's no big deal if I don't go myself to tell them.

Then, another question. Let's assume for the moment that God DOES INDEED offer another opportunity to those who have not heard, after their death. Is the Christian experience here and now worth enough that it is still needful, as much as is in our power, to make sure that people hear the Gospel? Would you want to tell them, even if the Christian life was only for this earthly life, and there is no resurrection? (That one gets into the question of whether the resurrection of Jesus is, or is not, a central part of the Gospel. As Paul says, If Christ has not been resurrected and transformed, then it is certain that no one else will be, either, and we are, in fact, the most miserable lot of people who have ever lived on this earth.)
0 x
silentreader

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by silentreader »

Ernie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 8:15 am
silentreader wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:08 pm
Ernie wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:20 pm
If a person refuses to believe that Jesus died, was buried, and rose again, I don't expect such a person to have eternal life.

But it wouldn't surprise me if people who aren't aware of this ancient happening (during the time they are living on this earth) are given eternal life. It happened for the OT saints, and therefore it does not seem to me to be outside of the character of God to do it for people today. I wouldn't encourage anyone to bank on this and try to stay ignorant as that is basically the same as refusing to believe that Jesus rose.
Interesting. So why evangelize, or disciple, if you prefer, if people would be better off not knowing and thus not being put at risk of making the wrong choice?
I do not know whether God gives all people a chance to hear the Gospel in this life or in the life to come. I'm just saying that it would not surprise me, and it would not be out of character for Him to do something like this, based on what he did between his death and resurrection.
But regardless of that, ignorance is not bliss. If a person makes the wrong choice in this life, they may also make the wrong choice should they have a chance in the life to come. It appears that not everybody in Hades heard and responded to the Gospel when Jesus came and preached to them (e.g. the rich man Dives). We don't know whether Dives did not hear the Gospel, whether he heard but did not respond favorably, or whether he heard but was not given the choice to respond, based on the choices he made in this life.
We do know that God wants people to believe, repent, and walk in newness of life in this life, so that is why we evangelize and make disciples.

Ignorance about God and His reality is not something that benefits anyone, whether in this life or the life to come. So, one of the reasons for evangelism and disciple-making is to help people understand reality and begin fulfilling the purpose for why they were created. Embracing reality includes believing in Jesus and in his death, burial, and resurrection.
We thrive whenever we embrace reality and begin embracing the purpose for our creation. I want to see everyone in the world, thrive!
What did Abraham say? (Not necessarily exact wording) "If they believed not Moses and the prophets, how will they believe if one came back from the dead?" How does that factor in?
Or Paul in Romans 1:18-20 (CSB)
18 For God’s wrath is revealed from heaven against all godlessness and unrighteousness of people who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth, 19 since what can be known about God is evident among them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, that is, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen since the creation of the world, being understood through what he has made. As a result, people are without excuse.
I probably also don't understand 1Peter 3:19-20 the same way as you seem to.
Last edited by silentreader on Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
Ernie

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by Ernie »

Neto wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:29 am You (Ernie) already answered this question, but I'll state it for the sake of other readers. Do 'you' think that a person who has never heard the Gospel will be more likely, or less likely to believe in this life, or in the afterlife (if offered such an opportunity)? (Personally, if I believed that there will be another opportunity, recognizing that God could explain the Gospel MUCH better than I, I would be reluctant to tell anyone here. If they have a better chance later, then I am condemning them to hell if I tell them, perhaps poorly, and they do not believe. At that point, see my last paragraph below, for another question.)
Since I do not know whether God will give people a chance after they die to hear the Gospel. I am doing what I can to spread the Gospel now. People might not get another chance. I also do it for the two reasons you mentioned. 1. it is Good News 2. We are commanded to do so.
Romans 1 seems to indicate that God will deal with those who have not heard in a different manner than those who did. How he will do that, the Bible does not tell us.

What I have a problem with is people creating doctrines, that either deny the possibility of God doing something apart from us, or insisting that God will do something for those who have not heard apart from us. We really don't know. All we can do is obey God's commands and trust Him to be a righteous judge.
Neto wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:29 am I could barely finish the story, because I broke down and began weeping. (If you need to know, I'm crying now, too.) Yowaki died without Christ, without any opportunity to hear or believe the Gospel. Whose 'fault' is that? Who was told - SENT - maybe even decades or a century or more before us, but didn't obey? We CANNOT just think, Oh, well, God will surely give them an opportunity at the last judgement, so it's no big deal if I don't go myself to tell them.
We too had an experience similar to this whenever the lady we baptized realized that her grandparents died without hearing the Gospel. We couldn't promise her that her grandparents will meet her in Paradise when she dies. She sobbed and sobbed for a long time. However, we could give her the assurance of Romans 1, that God is a good Judge and will do things in a right way.
Neto wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:29 am Then, another question. Let's assume for the moment that God DOES INDEED offer another opportunity to those who have not heard, after their death. Is the Christian experience here and now worth enough that it is still needful, as much as is in our power, to make sure that people hear the Gospel? Would you want to tell them, even if the Christian life was only for this earthly life, and there is no resurrection? (That one gets into the question of whether the resurrection of Jesus is, or is not, a central part of the Gospel. As Paul says, If Christ has not been resurrected and transformed, then it is certain that no one else will be, either, and we are, in fact, the most miserable lot of people who have ever lived on this earth.)
I don't assume that, but I understand you are raising this as a hypothetical.
Yes, the lady we baptized said she was accepting the Gospel based on this life. Eternity was too abstract in her mind for that to enter into her decision. That was three years ago. She is now back in a restricted country. She has had many trials the last three years, but she finds so much comfort in knowing that God is with her in these trials. Her estranged relationships are miraculously improving. The Gospel is Good News.
0 x
Ernie

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by Ernie »

silentreader wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:49 amWhat did Abraham say? (Not necessarily exact wording) "If they believed not Moses and the prophets, how will they believe if one came back from the dead?" How does that factor in?
Those who had the oracles of God committed to them are responsible to believe and repent and obey. I believe this was true in the OT and the NT.

Are you remembering that I said this originally?
If a person refuses to believe that Jesus died, was buried, and rose again, I don't expect such a person to have eternal life.
silentreader wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:49 am Or Paul in Romans 1:18-20 (CSB)
18 For God’s wrath is revealed from heaven against all godlessness and unrighteousness of people who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth, 19 since what can be known about God is evident among them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, that is, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen since the creation of the world, being understood through what he has made. As a result, people are without excuse.
Anyone who rejects God, or refuses to hear him, or resists his Spirit cannot claim to be innocent and cannot hope for further opportunity!

The Hebrew writer says,
today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion.
Today is the day of salvation. If God is speaking to you (whether through Creation, Gospel preaching, still small voice, or an angel) listen up! Do not harden your hearts!

Isaiah 30:15-16
For thus says the Lord God, the Holy One of Israel:
“In returning and rest you shall be saved;
In quietness and confidence shall be your strength.”
But you would not,
And you said, “No, for we will flee on horses”—
Therefore you shall flee!
And, “We will ride on swift horses”—
Therefore those who pursue you shall be swift!
I understand God to be saying, "If you try getting away from me, I will send swift horses after you. Don't think you can get away from me!"
0 x
Ernie

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by Ernie »

There is so much in the Bible that is painfully easy to understand. It is very clear what we should be thinking, what we should be believing, and what we should be doing.
Yet it seems that so many people (including preachers) like to clarify and solidify doctrines about the spiritual world and the afterlife that we only have very limited knowledge about. Let God be true and every man a liar.
0 x
Josh

Re: Why have the Anabaptists FAILED at Reaching the Masses

Post by Josh »

silentreader wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 10:56 am If you don't "exegete" and "practice" in "that paradigm" then you should be able to answer a simple question with a simple answer.
And I do actually wonder why you won't.
Because it's a loaded question. What are you really trying to ask?
0 x
Post Reply