I think it suggests that Republicans, of whom some are Christians, have been taken in by the concept of Individualism, an idea that runs counter to Christianity but is perfectly consonant with economic Liberalism. One finds it incumbent to note though that Democrats too have been taken in by Individualism as well, only theirs is in the social realm. Both Democrats and Republicans are thoroughly satanic in their pursuit of freedom without constraints.ohio jones wrote: ↑Sun May 14, 2023 1:58 pmIt suggests more directly that Republicans aren't Christians. The Democrats were already suspect.![]()
Socialism Vs. Capitalism
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: La Ceiba, Honduras
- Affiliation: LMC & IEMH
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
3 x
Affiliation: Lancaster Mennonite Conference & Honduran Mennonite Evangelical Church
- Josh
- Posts: 24911
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
- Location: 1000' ASL
- Affiliation: The church of God
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
And it would appear that "socialism" and "capitalism" are really just two sides of the same coin; that is, the coin of classical liberalism. And hence most of what see around the world is a hybrid of "socialism" and "capitalism" anyway, such as "market socialism" or 中国特色社会主义 ("socialism with Chinese characteristics").HondurasKeiser wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 5:06 pm I think it suggests that Republicans, of whom some are Christians, have been taken in by the concept of Individualism, an idea that runs counter to Christianity but is perfectly consonant with economic Liberalism. One finds it incumbent to note though that Democrats too have been taken in by Individualism as well, only theirs is in the social realm. Both Democrats and Republicans are thoroughly satanic in their pursuit of freedom without constraints.
1 x
- Josh
- Posts: 24911
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
- Location: 1000' ASL
- Affiliation: The church of God
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
It's pretty simple: you have a purse (or a cash box, or a bank account, or what have you). When one of you works and earns money, you deposit money into it. When there is a need, such as for food, clothing, or shelter, you pay for it out of that common purse.Chris wrote: ↑Sun May 14, 2023 10:27 pmAmazing! How does this work? I'm fascinated to hear "common purse" - that's a bit different than "all things common" but still....Josh wrote: ↑Sun May 14, 2023 4:53 pm I live in a Christian community with a common purse, and then am part of a larger Christian church that shares and bears one another’s burdens.
None of us would ever use the word “socialist” to describe ourselves. Indeed, allowance for private ownership and even individual ownership of means of production is important to us. Means of production that are shared with each other or shared with the needy are done so voluntarily.
It's not socialism in a Marx sense. Voluntary socialistic purses is very much fine as there is nothing forcing you to be this way.
But I'm VERY curious how the common purse works.
I also practice "all things in common", although in practical terms, the things we hold in common often have uses specific to an individual, such as specific bedroom, or a specific house for a single person or a family, and so on. Because I live in a country that implements capitalism / market socialism, I structure how we hold things in accordance with how the governments ordains that people who live with a common purse and hold all things in common should do so.
The most important aspect is joint decision making with it clearly defined who makes decisions, which means sometimes my ideas are persuasive, but sometimes I have to yield to what the other community members want to do. This means we end up being involved in each other's lives. We also must bear one another's burdens. The most significant burden I find is not one involving money, but rather bearing one another's burdens as it relates to health or lack thereof.
1 x
-
- Posts: 16898
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
- Location: Washington State
- Affiliation: former MCUSA
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
So what are the details?Josh wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 5:55 pmIt's pretty simple: you have a purse (or a cash box, or a bank account, or what have you). When one of you works and earns money, you deposit money into it. When there is a need, such as for food, clothing, or shelter, you pay for it out of that common purse.Chris wrote: ↑Sun May 14, 2023 10:27 pmAmazing! How does this work? I'm fascinated to hear "common purse" - that's a bit different than "all things common" but still....Josh wrote: ↑Sun May 14, 2023 4:53 pm I live in a Christian community with a common purse, and then am part of a larger Christian church that shares and bears one another’s burdens.
None of us would ever use the word “socialist” to describe ourselves. Indeed, allowance for private ownership and even individual ownership of means of production is important to us. Means of production that are shared with each other or shared with the needy are done so voluntarily.
It's not socialism in a Marx sense. Voluntary socialistic purses is very much fine as there is nothing forcing you to be this way.
But I'm VERY curious how the common purse works.
I also practice "all things in common", although in practical terms, the things we hold in common often have uses specific to an individual, such as specific bedroom, or a specific house for a single person or a family, and so on. Because I live in a country that implements capitalism / market socialism, I structure how we hold things in accordance with how the governments ordains that people who live with a common purse and hold all things in common should do so.
The most important aspect is joint decision making with it clearly defined who makes decisions, which means sometimes my ideas are persuasive, but sometimes I have to yield to what the other community members want to do. This means we end up being involved in each other's lives. We also must bear one another's burdens. The most significant burden I find is not one involving money, but rather bearing one another's burdens as it relates to health or lack thereof.
Does everyone contribute the same monthly amount? Or same percentage (i.e. 10% of income) or does the contribution vary based on need and ability? Is it voluntary or mandatory?
How is it different from say a monthly or quarterly HOA assessment that generates a "common purse" for a neighborhood association from which things like street maintenance and landscaping are paid?
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
-
- Posts: 4397
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:34 am
- Location: The flat part of Colorado
- Affiliation: MCUSA
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
I vaguely remember from seminary an argument from Stanley Fish that modernity (i.e. liberalism) is the water we swim in and we don't even realize it just as a fish doesn't realize it's swimming in water.HondurasKeiser wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 5:06 pmI think it suggests that Republicans, of whom some are Christians, have been taken in by the concept of Individualism, an idea that runs counter to Christianity but is perfectly consonant with economic Liberalism. One finds it incumbent to note though that Democrats too have been taken in by Individualism as well, only theirs is in the social realm. Both Democrats and Republicans are thoroughly satanic in their pursuit of freedom without constraints.ohio jones wrote: ↑Sun May 14, 2023 1:58 pmIt suggests more directly that Republicans aren't Christians. The Democrats were already suspect.![]()
0 x
“It’s easy to make everything a conspiracy when you don’t know how anything works.” — Brandon L. Bradford
- Josh
- Posts: 24911
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
- Location: 1000' ASL
- Affiliation: The church of God
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
I'm not sure what's difficult to understand about the concept.
Everyone contributes to the community according to their abilities and talents. This is how Hutterite communities function and how monasteries function.
Each person's needs are provided for, starting with essential needs (food, clothing, and shelter), and in turn more complex needs like medical needs. Often the "need" is not just money. For example, if someone has had a surgery, they might not be able to lift heavy objects for a while. They need support from others to help them with work tasks or day to day life tasks that might require heavy lifting.
Of course, needs vary. Children don't eat as much food as full grown adults. The shelter needs for families and single people are different.
A rather key difference is that membership is entirely voluntary and nothing is taken from anyone by force. For some reason, Ken, I feel like you have a lot of trouble understanding this distinction.How is it different from say a monthly or quarterly HOA assessment that generates a "common purse" for a neighborhood association from which things like street maintenance and landscaping are paid?
0 x
-
- Posts: 16898
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
- Location: Washington State
- Affiliation: former MCUSA
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
So is membership in an HOA. You can choose not to live in that community, many people do. But once you do voluntarily join, you agree to follow the community rules, same as with any church. Or at least any church that has rules and standards for membership and the will excommunicate or remove recalcitrant members. I recall a LOT of discussion here on this forum about "church discipline".
I was just curious how you come up with the amounts each person pays. Whether it is a fixed amount where everyone pays the same amount (like an HOA), a fixed percentage like a tithe, or something more variable and voluntary. And how much of each person's income is paid into the common purse. All of it?, half of it? five percent on average?
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
- Josh
- Posts: 24911
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
- Location: 1000' ASL
- Affiliation: The church of God
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
An HOA and a monastery are not remotely similar.Ken wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:55 pm So is membership in an HOA. You can choose not to live in that community, many people do. But once you do voluntarily join, you agree to follow the community rules, same as with any church. Or at least any church that has rules and standards for membership and the will excommunicate or remove recalcitrant members. I recall a LOT of discussion here on this forum about "church discipline".
Monks in a monastery don’t pay anything. They do perform work to support the monastery as a whole. An example is the sisters at a nearby monastery who bake bread and conduct soup sales.I was just curious how you come up with the amounts each person pays. Whether it is a fixed amount where everyone pays the same amount (like an HOA), a fixed percentage like a tithe, or something more variable and voluntary.
0 x
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
i was not aware that the Holdermans used a common purse.
apparently i'm learning something new.
shares and bears one another's burdens? yes, sure. that is pretty standard
and the Holdermans have been very good to us throughout the years. we aren't holderman, but they still have shared and born some of our burdens with us as a family.
1 x
Anything seems possible if you don't know what you are talking about. fb meme
You're entitled to your opinion, but I'm also entitled to ignore that nonsense. another fb meme
You're entitled to your opinion, but I'm also entitled to ignore that nonsense. another fb meme
- Josh
- Posts: 24911
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
- Location: 1000' ASL
- Affiliation: The church of God
Re: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
I don’t know anything about “Holdermans”. Holdemans don’t necessarily have a common purse but do have voluntary mutual aid.
I’m glad to hear that; my experience with Holdemans is very similar to yours with Holdermans.shares and bears one another's burdens? yes, sure. that is pretty standard
and the Holdermans have been very good to us throughout the years. we aren't holderman, but they still have shared and born some of our burdens with us as a family.
0 x