jm's random thots
-
Soloist
Re: jm's random thots
My son was 6 years old and he was killed by a semi truck though no fault of the driver.
0 x
-
Soloist
-
justme
Re: jm's random thots
i'd like to do an experiment, and i haven't talked to anyone about it. at all.
i'd like to give $70.00 each to Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap
they will need to be completely silent on mn for one week. all 4 in the same week. with a specific start time, and a specific stop time.
No posting, No hearts, No private messages, no 2nd account, NOTHING.
if one person breaks it, no one gets anything.
if one person other than Josh, Temporal1, Ken, or Bootstrap brings me proof that even one of the 4 has broken the rules, that one person will get $70.00, and Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap get nothing
the purpose of the experiment is to see what mn is like without the posters who are most at each other's throat. i would like to see if other people start posting if they know that they won't be drowned out by certain posters. i could do it one person at a time, but that only means that the others get free time without being set straight by their nemesis.
is this an experiment worth pursuing?
i'd like to give $70.00 each to Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap
they will need to be completely silent on mn for one week. all 4 in the same week. with a specific start time, and a specific stop time.
No posting, No hearts, No private messages, no 2nd account, NOTHING.
if one person breaks it, no one gets anything.
if one person other than Josh, Temporal1, Ken, or Bootstrap brings me proof that even one of the 4 has broken the rules, that one person will get $70.00, and Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap get nothing
the purpose of the experiment is to see what mn is like without the posters who are most at each other's throat. i would like to see if other people start posting if they know that they won't be drowned out by certain posters. i could do it one person at a time, but that only means that the others get free time without being set straight by their nemesis.
is this an experiment worth pursuing?
0 x
-
RZehr
Re: jm's random thots
Only if I can be included in the $70 offer. The top 8 posters instead of four.

0 x
-
justme
Re: jm's random thots
That makes it a bit more expensive than i want to pay for an experiment...
0 x
Re: jm's random thots
Would be interesting. But should we consider whether this might be detrimental to their mental health? I can’t help but think that this forum is filling some type of psychological need for them.justme wrote: ↑Sat Apr 22, 2023 10:38 pm i'd like to do an experiment, and i haven't talked to anyone about it. at all.
i'd like to give $70.00 each to Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap
they will need to be completely silent on mn for one week. all 4 in the same week. with a specific start time, and a specific stop time.
No posting, No hearts, No private messages, no 2nd account, NOTHING.
if one person breaks it, no one gets anything.
if one person other than Josh, Temporal1, Ken, or Bootstrap brings me proof that even one of the 4 has broken the rules, that one person will get $70.00, and Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap get nothing
the purpose of the experiment is to see what mn is like without the posters who are most at each other's throat. i would like to see if other people start posting if they know that they won't be drowned out by certain posters. i could do it one person at a time, but that only means that the others get free time without being set straight by their nemesis.
is this an experiment worth pursuing?
0 x
-
Josh
Re: jm's random thots
My mental health is fine and is not dependent on MennoNet, or did you mean the above in jest?
0 x
-
Josh
Re: jm's random thots
I don't need to be bribed $70 for such an experiment, and would be happy to.justme wrote: ↑Sat Apr 22, 2023 10:38 pm i'd like to do an experiment, and i haven't talked to anyone about it. at all.
i'd like to give $70.00 each to Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap
they will need to be completely silent on mn for one week. all 4 in the same week. with a specific start time, and a specific stop time.
No posting, No hearts, No private messages, no 2nd account, NOTHING.
if one person breaks it, no one gets anything.
if one person other than Josh, Temporal1, Ken, or Bootstrap brings me proof that even one of the 4 has broken the rules, that one person will get $70.00, and Josh, Temporal1, Ken, and Bootstrap get nothing
the purpose of the experiment is to see what mn is like without the posters who are most at each other's throat. i would like to see if other people start posting if they know that they won't be drowned out by certain posters. i could do it one person at a time, but that only means that the others get free time without being set straight by their nemesis.
is this an experiment worth pursuing?
I have proposed a few "truces" in the past, including via PM with Bootstrap and Ken, but never got any traction from Ken on proposing a truce between the two of us arguing. I decided a while ago that I don't think this forum should become his personal mouthpiece, so I've felt at liberty to join in on the many discussions he starts or responds to here.
0 x