So what are you saying? That in order to not have violence, frequent classroom disruptions, and 0% of pupils at grade level in math in 23 schools (up from 17 schools in 2017), it's necessary to... build two swimming pools?Ken wrote: ↑Wed Feb 22, 2023 4:44 pmOh, and that new $43 million pool they are building? It will be the SECOND pool at that high school. By the way, how many Olympic size natatoriums do the Baltimore public schools have? And, of course, none this spending is counted in that $10,000 per student cost you cited because it is capital expenditures not operating costs. But OK, keep telling us how it is Baltimore that is spending more on school construction and upgrades than Carmel.
Expensive facilities are not needed to teach math.
Still not sure what you're getting at here.Also, wealthy districts like Carmel also run big education foundations which are basically endowment funds through which they fund all kinds of grants that are "off the books" so to speak because it is charitable donations from local companies and individuals. A PTA on steroids so to speak. That is another common way that wealthy districts spend more money than poorer ones. It is basically like a university endowment but for a public school district that operates completely separate from the regular taxes and operating budget.
Baltimore has a budget that is twice that of Carmel's per student. That money has to come from somewhere, and is indeed paid with taxes paid for by the wealthy in the city (and the state, and also from federal funds). Carmel is making do with half of what Baltimore has.
Yes, it's true that the members of the community have decided to donate funds to build facilities to the school. There is nothing stopping parents in Baltimore from doing the same thing. It just appears that the people there have other priorities for how to spend their money than spending it on improving their public schools. Maybe they feel like it would be a waste of money due to corrupt, wasteful school administration?