I don't think it is necessarily a marketing ploy. But you have to be intelligent. Not all foods are equal. For example, it is probably more useful to buy organic fruit and produce that you do not peel such as strawberries and lettuce where the food you eat is exposed directly to whatever chemicals are applied. In contrast to fruits with thick peels like bananas and oranges where any chemicals on the surface of the fruit will be removed and discarded before eating. So if I am going to pay more for organic fruit I will spend it on strawberries, blueberries, apples, etc. Rather than bananas, limes, and oranges.Szdfan wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 10:15 amMy wife is outspokenly anti-organic food because she believes it’s a marketing ploy to charge more for food. Is there authentically organic food out there? Yes, but a lot of organic food in the grocery store still uses herbicides and pesticides, just the ones that meets the USDA’s production standards for “organic.”
As for herbicides and pesticides? Yes there are organic forms of pest control such as neem oil and diatomaceous earth. I'm not totally up on the current most modern methods of organic pest controls to know if there are any forms of pesticides certified for use in organic farms that are considered problematic from a human health standpoint.
At least there is a process for certifying organic farms and standards for them to follow which would not be the case absent any regulations. If that were the case then the term "organic" would have no meaning at all and would just be another meaningless marketing term like "lite" or "nutritious"
Now that the market in organic foods is growing, big agribusiness is moving into the space with a vengeance. But I expect that is inevitable and to be expected. I would rather they at least have standards and regulations to follow before calling themselves "organic" than the alternative which is no regulations. And it is probably a good trend if it means less chemical use by big agribusiness.