This is one of the biggest puzzles.GaryK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 02, 2022 12:24 pm He may not pick DAs but by his own admission he helps fund their campaigns.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-i-supp ... 1659277441This is why I have supported the election (and more recently the re-election) of prosecutors who support reform.
I have done it transparently, and I have no intention of stopping.
The funds I provide enable sensible reform-minded candidates to receive a hearing from the public. Judging by the results, the public likes what it’s hearing
When politicians, lobbyists, etc., describe straight-up what they’re about, what they’re planning, yet so many deny it, minimize it, ignore it, excuse it, etc. Then they vote for it, for policies that lead to it.
Later, they complain about unwanted results, never connecting the dots about their own involvement!
Over and over and over.
“Judging by the results,” on surface, seems a fair+logical conclusion.
Except when considering the well-known fact that MONEY buys results. It’s very well studied, Madison Avenue exists on it.
Billionaires’ meddling artificially changes the course of life. It’s their calculated+focused goal. Not a game of chance.
They are in it to win it. Behind politicians, their front-men.