It isn’t one or the other... My position is that helping them is a more effective approach than shaming them. ..
The reality is, there are many sophisticated effective established options for “Ministering to People With Unwanted Pregnancies” -
the real world is not stuck in .. 1900. (In addition to history’s #1 go-to responders: families, friends.) There’s no need to reinvent the wheel. Make use of it, expand on it, improve it. But no need to think this is something that’s never been addressed.
Unfortunately, too many people seem to be so reliant on the NYT, et al., if they don’t see it featured there, it doesn’t exist.
FALSE. The inordinate influence of the NYT is dismal.
It appears many could benefit from expanded horizons.
Safe Haven Baby Boxestemporal1 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 7:34 amMaxPC wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 7:00 am I am grateful to the Lord that this has been decided.
Here is the Supreme Court pdf copy of the full decision in 19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson.
In truth, has any group of Christians dedicated more effort to this, in every practical hands-on way, than Catholics?
Pro life, pro traditional family. (With the exceptions of those elected to high political office.)
Save the Storks
Take my hand, not my life
March for Life
Priests for Life
Lifesitenews
Lila Rose
Matt Walsh
David Daleidon
Crisis Pregnancy Centers (concept, i think)
Catholic adoptions
Marriage retreats
There are more i can’t place at the moment, i expect there are more, still.
more, not Catholic alone:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_a ... ted_States
SCOTUS is obligated to rule based on the Constitution, not popular opinion.
Still, without a case to rule on, they don’t rule. they don’t “rule out of nowhere.”
The Cloud of Witnesses - The MennoNet Wall
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4181&hilit=cloud
.. please correct if+where incorrect or incomplete. i’m still reeling from this news. it’s big news.
but not the end of need for work and prayers for .. life on earth.
https://shbb.org/