"Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

When it just doesn't fit anywhere else.
temporal1

"Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

From Rand Paul.
i just received this email in quotes below.
(i lightly redacted my personal ID info; i added " :arrow: " where they are found.)
Dear ....,

For 43 years, a few unelected men and women on the Supreme Court have played God with innocent human life.

They have invented laws that condemned to painful deaths without trial more than 61 million babies for the crime of being "inconvenient."

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling forced abortion-on-demand down our nation's throat.

In the past, many in the pro-life movement have felt limited to protecting a life here and there -- passing some limited law to slightly control abortion in the more outrageous cases.

But some pro-lifers always seem to tiptoe around the Supreme Court, hoping they won't be offended.

Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is over.

Working from what the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade, pro-life lawmakers can pass a Life at Conception Act and end abortion using the Constitution instead of amending it.

That is why it's so urgent you sign the petition to your Senators and Congressman that I will link to in a moment.

Thanks to the results of the last election, you and I are in a better than ever position to force an up or down roll call vote on the Life at Conception Act.

And your petition will help do just that.

Signing the Life at Conception Act petition will help break through the opposition clinging to abortion-on-demand and ultimately win a vote on this life-saving bill to overturn Roe v. Wade.

A Life at Conception Act declares unborn children "persons" as defined by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, entitled to legal protection.

This is the one thing the Supreme Court admitted in Roe v. Wade that would cause the case for legal abortion to "collapse."

When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined "right of privacy" which it "discovered" in so-called "emanations" of "penumbrae" of the Constitution.

Of course, as constitutional law it was a disaster.

But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a constitutional right.

Instead the Supreme Court said:

"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins... the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

Then the High Court made a key admission:

"If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e., "Roe" who sought an abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."

The fact is, the 14th Amendment couldn't be clearer:

"... nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law."

Furthermore, the 14th Amendment says:

"Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

That's exactly what a Life at Conception Act would do.

But this simple, logical and obviously right legislation will not become law without a fight.

And that's where your help is critical.

You see, it will be a tough fight, but I believe with your signed petition it is one we can win.

:arrow: Please click here to sign your petition right away.



By turning up the heat through a massive, national, grass-roots campaign in this session of Congress, one of two things will happen.

If you and other pro-life activists pour on enough pressure, pro-lifers can force politicians from both parties who were elected on pro-life platforms to make good on their promises and ultimately win passage of this bill.

But even if a Life at Conception Act doesn't pass immediately, the public attention will send another crew of radical abortionists down to defeat in the 2016 elections.

Either way, the unborn win... unless you do nothing.

That's why the National Pro-Life Alliance is contacting hundreds of thousands of Americans just like you to mobilize a grass-roots army to pass a Life at Conception Act.

The first thing you must do is sign your petition by clicking here.

They are the key ingredient in the National Pro-Life Alliance's plan to pass a Life at Conception Act. They'll also organize:
... Hard-hitting TV, radio and newspaper ads to be run just before each vote, detailing the horrors of abortion and mobilizing the American people.

... Extensive personal lobbying of key members of Congress by rank and file National Pro-Life Alliance members and staff.

... A series of newspaper columns to be distributed free to all 1,387 daily newspapers now published in the United States.

... An extensive email, direct mail and telephone campaign to generate at least one million petitions to Congress like the one linked to in this letter.

Of course, to do all this will take a lot of money.

Just to email and mail the letters necessary to produce one million petitions will cost at least $460,000.

Newspaper, TV and radio are even more expensive.

But I'm sure you'll agree pro-lifers cannot just sit by watching the slaughter continue.

The National Pro-Life Alliance's goal is to deliver one million petitions to the House and Senate in support of a Life at Conception Act.

When the bill comes up for a vote in Congress, it is crucial to have the full weight of an informed public backing the pro-life position.

I feel confident that the folks at National Pro-Life Alliance can gather those one million petitions.

But even though many Americans who receive this email will sign the petition, many won't be able to contribute. That's why it's vital you chip in $10 or $25 or even more if you can.

Without your help the National Pro-Life Alliance will be unable to gather the one million petitions and mount the full-scale national campaign necessary to pass a Life at Conception Act.

A sacrificial gift of $35 or even $100 or $500 now could spare literally millions of innocent babies in years to come. But if that's too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10.

You should also know that a National Pro-Life Alliance supporter wants to make your decision to give easier by agreeing to match your donation, no matter the size, increasing its value by 50%!

So please respond right away with your signed petition.



And please help by chipping in a contribution of at least $10 or $25. Some people have already given as much as $500. Others have given $50 and $100.

But no matter how much you give, whether it's chipping in with $10 or a larger contribution of $150, I guarantee your contribution is urgently needed and will be deeply appreciated.

That's why I hope and pray that you will not delay a moment to make a contribution of $1000, $500, $100, $50, $25, or even $10 if you can.

Your contribution to the National Pro-Life Alliance and your signed petition will be the first steps toward reversing Roe v. Wade and waking up the politicians about where our barbarous pro-abortion policy is taking us.

Sincerely,

Rand Paul,
United States Senator

P.S. The Supreme Court itself admitted -- if Congress declares unborn children "persons" under the law, the constitutional case for abortion-on-demand "collapses."

That's why it's so critical to work to get a vote on the Life at Conception Act, legislation that would reverse Roe v. Wade.

:arrow:

Please help make that happen. Sign your petition today to the National Pro-Life Alliance to reverse Roe v. Wade.

Your petition is the critical first step in fighting to end abortion.

Along with your signed petition, please consider making a sacrificial contribution of $100, $50 or $25. If that's too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10 or $25.

You should also know a generous donor has agreed to match all contributions, no matter the size, increasing your gift to the National Pro-Life Alliance by 50%!


Because of NPLA's tax-exempt status under IRC Sec. 501(c)(4) and its state and federal legislative activities, contributions are not tax-deductible as charitable contributions (IRC § 170) or as business deductions (IRC § 162(e)(1)). Privacy Policy.

This email was sent to ....
why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences
LifeSiteNews.com · 104 Bond St, third floor · Toronto, Ontario M5B1X9 · Canada
Interesting (to me) this Rand Paul, KY, petition came to me from Canada.
Canada is in big trouble with these very same matters. :(
It's the stated priority of liberal political activists (obama+trudeau "leading") that ALL countries, ALL peoples, be dominated by their unique political aspirations. (United Under Amorality?)

A few MN questions:
1. In my life, i have RARELY signed any petition. Do Anabaptists sign petitions, ever?

2. What should Anabaptists, or any Christian, do when intrinsically non-political matters (like life+death, or, family matters, parents' responsibilities, or, the work of churches) are politicized/"made political," in the world?

i will be considering whether to sign the petition. (i presume it can be found by googling.)
this petition is also requesting donations. as i do not have money, contributing is very close to impossible.
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

In the subject line, i put "persons" in quotes.
Today, "persons" has been made into a political-legal battle word. :(

Rand Paul put "inconvenient" in quotes in the text of his letter.
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

i forwarded this thread to a friend with this message.
decided to share it here, too:

i might add to this topic, my sincere wish is for the world to stop politicizing "intrinsically non-political" matters.

the foxes are in the henhouses! they are fat and full of themselves.

honestly, ... , i truly believe these amoral foxes must be "drunk" on their own sucesss and power, they are smug and appear to feel invincible.

well, one thing we can know.
"THAT'S" always a big mistake.

"pride goeth before a fall." [wait for it!]
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

now, post Trump election -
there seems to be optimism Roe versus Wade may be overturned.
months ago, i read a statement from Dr Ben Carson that he believes the case should be revisited. many agree.

why not?
since that ruling, the world now has abundant scientific research, including clarity of medical photography, that proves the humanity of the not-yet-born.

it's a shame that what has been recognized throughout history on every continent, in every culture, now has to be "proven" in human courts, by way of science. but, that's the fallen world of this day.

even animals know to protect and nourish their young (with few exceptions.)

we're a smart bunch, eh? :-|
scriptures warn about the fail of relying on human reasoning, we seem to exist to prove it! :shock:
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

2+ years later - i’d forgotten about this thread.

2019 - MARCH FOR LIFE seems to be getting increased public recognition.
strange (to me) how it was oddly ignored in the past.

Romans 10:15
https://biblehub.com/romans/10-15.htm

Image

Another recent “happening” for inconvenient persons:
“Planned Parenthood loses big in court”
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1790
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

A LOT of feet: :shock:
2019 March for Life / Time lapse video / 54 sec.
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

Now going on 3 years since Rand Paul’s effort.
i haven’t heard anymore about it.

The UNwanted unborn continue to be in peril of for-hire premeditated murder.
With lethal precision, comparatively primitive firearms are not involved.

There should be substantial nonpartisan agreement on this.
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

4 years later .. 2020.
0 x
temporal1

Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

2022

“Outcomes of Overturning Roe Vs. Wade”
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5042
0 x
temporal1
Posts: 5282
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:57 pm
Affiliation: Christian

2026 Re: "Inconvenient" "Persons" [Rand Paul's Petition for the Unborn]

Post by temporal1 »

2026 England

FTD / frontotemporal dementia
a neurodegenerative disease that affects personality, speech and mobility and has no cure.

“2 Brothers May Only Have Years Left Before Mom’s Rare Disease Kills Them, Too. They’re Not Going Quietly” (Exclusive)
FTD killed their mom, and now Jordan and Cian Adams are using the time they have left to raise awareness and funding for research
https://people.com/brothers-facing-rare ... e-12059338
.. That same week in 2023, Jordan and his now-wife, Agnès, learned they were expecting — but testing showed the fetus carried the mutation, and they terminated the pregnancy. :shock:

“It was the most difficult decision of our lives,” Jordan says. “We know it’s not something everyone will agree with, we respect that, but we felt it was in the best interest of the child.”

Rather than wait for the illness, the brothers got busy. Jordan left his design and painting job in 2025 to become an advocate through their foundation and with online content — future goals include climbing Mount Kilimanjaro in October — while Cian, a physical therapist, supports their efforts when he can (and helps Jordan recover with massages).

“I made the decision to build a legacy that can continue even after dementia takes our lives,” Jordan says.

i was reading this article with interest, believing this was my husband’s illness.
He had all indicators. He passed at age 60, 7 years after diagnosis. Part of the pattern.

When i got to the end of the article, where they chose to ABORT their child because of the possibility of FTD, i was shocked.

Because your child might “only” have 40-50+ years??!! :shock:

What is the expectation? How many don’t have anywhere near 40-50+ years, FTD not involved?

My husband lived a full and productive life, able and grateful.
Even after his diagnosis, he had years he continued to work and drive.
He had no regrets. Even on the hardest days.

i’m astonished at this decision. Proverbs 3:5

Is there any reason not to abort?
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.

”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
Post Reply