What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

General Christian Theology
Bootstrap

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Bootstrap »

Soloist wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 11:48 am
You will have to actually read a bit to see the quotes you so desire. It was pretty easy to search but here you go Boot.
I saw this earlier. There's a lot of smear in this - "can she prove, to our satisfaction ...." In public, on social media, Twitter threads and blog posts. I mean really, is that the right way for Christians to approach this?

But the quotes from Beth Moore herself seem pretty clear.
Beth Moore wrote:I hold firmly to a traditional Christian sexual ethic and continue to believe the Bible sets apart marriage as a covenant between a man and a woman. But I also believe that Scripture clearly teaches that all sex outside of marriage is contrary to God‘s will.
She also said this:
Beth Moore wrote:Here is what I no longer have the stomach for after the last several years: the hypocrisy burgeoning from hyper fundamentalist Christianity. I do not lack a Scriptural view of sin. I just believe in a longer list of serious sins than some.

“Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” (Galatians 5:19-21)
I agree with both of these statements.
Soloist wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 11:48 am https://baptistmessage.com/beth-moore-c ... ual-sin-2/

Take a look at this one for what she did with her book
Yes, she clearly did water down her statements in that book. But that's different from what people are accusing her of. How did Jesus talk to prostitutes and the adulteress? How did Jesus talk to the religiously self-righteous who poured out contempt on them? Can we make this about Jesus and the Kingdom of God?

I agree that we need to be clear about sin. But not just the sins of other people. I agree that gay sex is not compatible with biblical Christianity. But I also think we need to be like Jesus in the way we approach sinners. And I think we need to follow biblical principles on a whole lot of other things this thread brings up.
0 x
Soloist

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Soloist »

Bootstrap wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 12:04 pm
Yes, she clearly did water down her statements in that book. But that's different from what people are accusing her of. How did Jesus talk to prostitutes and the adulteress? How did Jesus talk to the religiously self-righteous who poured out contempt on them? Can we make this about Jesus and the Kingdom of God?

I agree that we need to be clear about sin. But not just the sins of other people. I agree that gay sex is not compatible with biblical Christianity. But I also think we need to be like Jesus in the way we approach sinners. And I think we need to follow biblical principles on a whole lot of other things this thread brings up.
I think you are taking a very high view of her that is not based in reality. I don't know her and I identified quite quickly that she is leaving Biblical Christianity behind if she ever was one.
0 x
Ken
Posts: 21863
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Ken »

Soloist wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 1:28 pm
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 12:04 pm
Yes, she clearly did water down her statements in that book. But that's different from what people are accusing her of. How did Jesus talk to prostitutes and the adulteress? How did Jesus talk to the religiously self-righteous who poured out contempt on them? Can we make this about Jesus and the Kingdom of God?

I agree that we need to be clear about sin. But not just the sins of other people. I agree that gay sex is not compatible with biblical Christianity. But I also think we need to be like Jesus in the way we approach sinners. And I think we need to follow biblical principles on a whole lot of other things this thread brings up.
I think you are taking a very high view of her that is not based in reality. I don't know her and I identified quite quickly that she is leaving Biblical Christianity behind if she ever was one.
This isn't about Beth Moore. She left the SBC behind and is no longer part of the conversation within the SBC. It's really about the conflict between the ultra-conservatives represented by Mike Stone and the author of the article we are talking about. Versus the more mainstream conservative wing represented by Ed Litton, who narrowly won the SBC election. Beth Moore has nothing to do with SBC politics anymore.

They are going after Ed Litton because he had the temerity to preach with his wife at his side. And he has called for things like racial reconciliation.
Horrifying stuff like that.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
Bootstrap

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Bootstrap »

Soloist wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 1:28 pm
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 12:04 pmYes, she clearly did water down her statements in that book. But that's different from what people are accusing her of. How did Jesus talk to prostitutes and the adulteress? How did Jesus talk to the religiously self-righteous who poured out contempt on them? Can we make this about Jesus and the Kingdom of God?

I agree that we need to be clear about sin. But not just the sins of other people. I agree that gay sex is not compatible with biblical Christianity. But I also think we need to be like Jesus in the way we approach sinners. And I think we need to follow biblical principles on a whole lot of other things this thread brings up.
I think you are taking a very high view of her that is not based in reality. I don't know her and I identified quite quickly that she is leaving Biblical Christianity behind if she ever was one.
I don't know here well enough to have a strong view of her teaching at all. And neither do you. So far, you have not provided evidence of your claim or of Josh's. But here's what bothers me: we coddle people who come in and make strong accusations without proof, we never ask them to prove or retract these claims, we don't strongly censure them for doing that. That's what keeps the social media goon squads going. How can people do that and pretend to be more righteous than thou? Why would Christians accept that behavior on a Christian forum? Isn't this Christianity 101?

Once more, here is Josh's claim:
Josh wrote:Beth Moore embraced full inclusion a while ago and also recanted statements in her earlier books.
That directly contradicts Beth Moore's words:
Beth Moore wrote:I hold firmly to a traditional Christian sexual ethic and continue to believe the Bible sets apart marriage as a covenant between a man and a woman. But I also believe that Scripture clearly teaches that all sex outside of marriage is contrary to God‘s will.
That's one reason Beth Moore gave for changing the book, too, that homosexual sin and heterosexual sin are both equally contrary to God's will. The other is that she wants gays to read further and see what she says about being delivered from sexual sin. Gay sinners are no more demonic than straight sinners, both need God's grace, both need to repent. I think the rest of the chapter is clear about that.

https://blog.lproof.org/2019/07/why-i-r ... -word.html
For those needing further information on the removal of some of my words (not God’s words but my own) from the chapter I’d written on “Overcoming Sexual Strongholds” in the prayer book Praying God’s Word:

When I wrote PGW many years ago, I exceeded Scripture and singled out same-sex sin as particularly satanic.

As the years passed, I increasingly winced at what I’d conveyed but the basic rule of thumb in authorship is that it is better not to go back and edit an old book but, rather, let it just phase out and simply don’t make the same mistake in the future. The problem was, because PGW is a handbook and not a regular nonfiction book, it didn’t phase out in the same way. I have had many years to test the fruit of what I wrote and have seen over and over again that numerous readers, who had gone to this chapter with their struggles, came to my words and proceeded no further. My words had kept them from God’s words. That, to me, is a pretty serious stumbling block.

I also heard from some heartbroken mothers about their kids who were having a hard enough time feeling ostracized as it was. This prayer book sits on the bedside tables and on the shelves in many Christian homes. Picture a 13 year old struggling with an onslaught of sexual feelings and temptations who has no idea what to do with them. The child picks up the book and reads my words, only, in this case, comes to the conclusion that he or she is particularly demonic. Not only is that devastating to the child. It is not even biblical.

I hold firmly to a traditional Christian sexual ethic and continue to believe the Bible sets apart marriage as a covenant between a man and a woman. But I also believe that Scripture clearly teaches that all sex outside of marriage is contrary to God‘s will.

Here is what I would want that 13-year-old to know:

I want that kid to know that the author of that book, Praying God’s Word, has been forgiven for more sins than that kid can fathom. I want that kid to know my gracious and merciful Savior, Jesus, and that I would have had reasons in my past to have been thrown out of the camp under Old Testament law if not stoned to death. By the power of the cross of Christ, I live. By His grace alone, I serve.
0 x
Bootstrap

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Bootstrap »

Let me point out another irony of this thread. Max and I are both in churches were lots of people disagree with the biblical view of homosexuality. Both Max and I believe that gay sex is forbidden in the Bible. As far as I can tell, the Southern Baptist Church does not have gay-friendly churches. MC-USA and the Catholic Church do.

For instance, here is a church in the Castro district of San Francisco where 80% of the parishioners are gay:

https://www.ncronline.org/news/parish/g ... -accepting

The New York Times wrote a series on the gay-friendly parishes in New York City:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/06/nyre ... -city.html

Here's a web page for the LGBTQIA+ Ministry at Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Washington, DC:

https://trinity.org/lgbtqia-ministry/

It may be very hard to prove the existence of plain Catholics, but gay Catholics are very easy to find.

Max assures us that these people would be instantly excommunicated in the Catholic Church, but here they are, right out in the open. Some of the things Max is most concerned about are very much present in Catholic seminaries and colleges and schools - and in MC-USA ones too. My local church holds to the biblical position and to the official Mennonite Confession of Faith, I imagine the Catholics Max fellowships with also hold to traditional teaching. I imagine Max struggles with that just as much as I do.

But I don't see why either of us would choose to throw stones at a denomination that does not have the same problems as ours on this particular issue.
0 x
Ken
Posts: 21863
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Ken »

Bootstrap wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 2:50 pm Let me point out another irony of this thread. Max and I are both in churches were lots of people disagree with the biblical view of homosexuality. Both Max and I believe that gay sex is forbidden in the Bible. As far as I can tell, the Southern Baptist Church does not have gay-friendly churches. MC-USA and the Catholic Church do.

For instance, here is a church in the Castro district of San Francisco where 80% of the parishioners are gay:

https://www.ncronline.org/news/parish/g ... -accepting

The New York Times wrote a series on the gay-friendly parishes in New York City:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/06/nyre ... -city.html

Here's a web page for the LGBTQIA+ Ministry at Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Washington, DC:

https://trinity.org/lgbtqia-ministry/

It may be very hard to prove the existence of plain Catholics, but gay Catholics are very easy to find.

Max assures us that these people would be instantly excommunicated in the Catholic Church, but here they are, right out in the open. Some of the things Max is most concerned about are very much present in Catholic seminaries and colleges and schools - and in MC-USA ones too. My local church holds to the biblical position and to the official Mennonite Confession of Faith, I imagine the Catholics Max fellowships with also hold to traditional teaching. I imagine Max struggles with that just as much as I do.

But I don't see why either of us would choose to throw stones at a denomination that does not have the same problems as ours on this particular issue.
There are various Baptist organizations and churches that are LGBT-friendly, or have LGBT-friendly congregations. For example:

Alliance of Baptists: https://allianceofbaptists.org/
Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists: https://awab.org/
National Baptist Convention: https://www.nationalbaptist.com/

In addition, mainstream Southern Baptist institutions like Baylor University are increasingly open and supportive of LGBT-rights. This just happened last month:

Baylor regents approve measure to support LGBTQ students, construction on new Welcome Center:
https://wacotrib.com/news/local/educati ... 194b6.html

Maybe the Baptists aren't so different from anyone else after all.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
Bootstrap

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Bootstrap »

Ken wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:13 pm
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 2:50 pm But I don't see why either of us would choose to throw stones at a denomination that does not have the same problems as ours on this particular issue.
There are various Baptist organizations and churches that are LGBT-friendly, or have LGBT-friendly congregations. For example:

Alliance of Baptists: https://allianceofbaptists.org/
Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists: https://awab.org/
National Baptist Convention: https://www.nationalbaptist.com/
But none of those are Southern Baptist, are they?
Ken wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:13 pmIn addition, mainstream Southern Baptist institutions like Baylor University are increasingly open and supportive of LGBT-rights. This just happened last month:

Baylor regents approve measure to support LGBTQ students, construction on new Welcome Center:
https://wacotrib.com/news/local/educati ... 194b6.html

Maybe the Baptists aren't so different from anyone else after all.
This is news to me. I'm still parsing this out, but the article says that their acceptance of LGBTQ students is not an acceptance of gay sex, and that it is expected to be subject to this Statement on Human Sexuality
Statement on Human Sexuality

Baylor University welcomes all students into a safe and supportive environment in which to discuss and learn about a variety of issues, including those of human sexuality. The University affirms the biblical understanding of sexuality as a gift from God. Christian churches across the ages and around the world have affirmed purity in singleness and fidelity in marriage between a man and a woman as the biblical norm. Temptations to deviate from this norm include both heterosexual sex outside of marriage and homosexual behavior. It is thus expected that Baylor students will not participate in advocacy groups which promote understandings of sexuality that are contrary to biblical teaching.

The University encourages students struggling with these issues to avail themselves of opportunities for serious, confidential discussion, and support through the Spiritual Life Office (254)-710-3517 or through the Baylor University Counseling Center (254)-710-2467.
But the article was not really clear on that. If their acceptance is subject to the conditions above, I have no problem with it. I have heard that there are heterosexual college students who struggle with sexuality too.
0 x
Soloist

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Soloist »

I think that she has not answered any questions from sincere people and she also has demanded to have female pastors teaching both men and women. Regardless of proof presented to you, you will reject it unless it lines up with either approved fact checkers, approved news sources or approved statements.
0 x
Ken
Posts: 21863
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Ken »

Bootstrap wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:21 pm
Ken wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:13 pm
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 2:50 pm But I don't see why either of us would choose to throw stones at a denomination that does not have the same problems as ours on this particular issue.
There are various Baptist organizations and churches that are LGBT-friendly, or have LGBT-friendly congregations. For example:

Alliance of Baptists: https://allianceofbaptists.org/
Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists: https://awab.org/
National Baptist Convention: https://www.nationalbaptist.com/
But none of those are Southern Baptist, are they?
Ken wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:13 pmIn addition, mainstream Southern Baptist institutions like Baylor University are increasingly open and supportive of LGBT-rights. This just happened last month:

Baylor regents approve measure to support LGBTQ students, construction on new Welcome Center:
https://wacotrib.com/news/local/educati ... 194b6.html

Maybe the Baptists aren't so different from anyone else after all.
This is news to me. I'm still parsing this out, but the article says that their acceptance of LGBTQ students is not an acceptance of gay sex, and that it is expected to be subject to this Statement on Human Sexuality
Statement on Human Sexuality

Baylor University welcomes all students into a safe and supportive environment in which to discuss and learn about a variety of issues, including those of human sexuality. The University affirms the biblical understanding of sexuality as a gift from God. Christian churches across the ages and around the world have affirmed purity in singleness and fidelity in marriage between a man and a woman as the biblical norm. Temptations to deviate from this norm include both heterosexual sex outside of marriage and homosexual behavior. It is thus expected that Baylor students will not participate in advocacy groups which promote understandings of sexuality that are contrary to biblical teaching.

The University encourages students struggling with these issues to avail themselves of opportunities for serious, confidential discussion, and support through the Spiritual Life Office (254)-710-3517 or through the Baylor University Counseling Center (254)-710-2467.
But the article was not really clear on that. If their acceptance is subject to the conditions above, I have no problem with it. I have heard that there are heterosexual college students who struggle with sexuality too.
Baptists are like Mennonites. They have a LOT of different branches ranging from ultra-conservative to liberal. The SBC no more speaks for Baptists than MCUSA or the Groffdale Conference speaks for Mennonites. And I would personally not applaud a denomination that was founded in defense of slavery and spent the subsequent 100 years using biblical arguments to segregation.

As for Baylor? They are treading the exact same knife's edge that MCUSA is doing. They are becoming much more welcoming of LGBT-students in practice while not changing their actual articles of faith. The MCUSA Confession of Faith does not tolerate same-sex marriage despite what some churches are doing. https://www.mennoniteusa.org/who-are-me ... /marriage/ Baylor is no different from MCUSA in that respect. They are torn between their desire to be the Baptist Notre Dame or Georgetown with all the status and money that comes with that. And the pull of their more conservative trustees and supporters who want it to return to its more conservative regional bible college roots.

My larger point is that just because the SBC has managed to purge any whiff of LGBT-friendly leadership from its top ranks, doesn't mean that Baptists aren't going through the same exact issues as everyone else.
Last edited by Ken on Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
Bootstrap

Re: What are your thoughts re Hegelian dialectic?

Post by Bootstrap »

Soloist wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:36 pm I think that she has not answered any questions from sincere people and she also has demanded to have female pastors teaching both men and women. Regardless of proof presented to you, you will reject it unless it lines up with either approved fact checkers, approved news sources or approved statements.
She does believe in female pastors.

But the honorable, Christian thing to do is to either present evidence for your other accusations or retract them, please don't throw shade on me instead of doing one of these two things. Even if you presented evidence that I don't accept, that would be the honorable, Christian thing to do. And so would responding directly to the evidence I have presented that she has a biblical view of sexuality and marriage.

False accusations or accusations without evidence are not Christian virtues. If the world rejects us because we look like Jesus, that's the cost of discipleship. If the world rejects us because we do not ... that's another matter.
0 x
Post Reply