briar patch

When it just doesn't fit anywhere else.
JohnH
Posts: 9519
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: Russia and US should decide Ukraine's fate?

Post by JohnH »

Southerner wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:03 am
JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:00 am
Southerner wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:57 am
Are you permitted to post like this on the forum?
Why is your instinct to reach for censorship?
I am the one feeling censored, lol! We can have this back and forth all day! You want to skew news, go for it.
You have been free to share your opinion and make your case, have you not?
0 x
JohnH
Posts: 9519
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: Russia and US should decide Ukraine's fate?

Post by JohnH »

Southerner wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:13 am
JohnL wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:33 am
Southerner wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 7:03 am
I have watched the entire video. And Zelensky never interrupted...Vance instead did. Please post where you see Zelensky interrupting.
I don’t think you did watch an unedited version. It’s pretty clear that Z interrupted Vance first. He also called Vance an b*****d in Ukrainian. Z’s behaviors are out of line and war-mongering to the point of starting WW3.

Either you need new glasses and hearing aids or you’re deliberately promoting fake news. Either way you said nothing about joining the forum to try to play gotcha as a Democrat supporter. The folks here know where to find unbiased vids and info.
Post your raw video. As I have said before all the videos that I watched show Vance interrupting. And Vance lied...saying things like Zelensky campaigned for the opposition in PA when he visited a munitions factory in Scranton.

Saying I need glasses and hearing aids isn't appreciated.
… he went to a Democratic campaign event. I don’t think foreign leaders should be doing that.
0 x
Southerner
Posts: 592
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2025 4:52 pm
Affiliation: Menno

Re: Russia and US should decide Ukraine's fate?

Post by Southerner »

JohnH wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:36 am
Southerner wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:13 am
JohnL wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:33 am

I don’t think you did watch an unedited version. It’s pretty clear that Z interrupted Vance first. He also called Vance an b*****d in Ukrainian. Z’s behaviors are out of line and war-mongering to the point of starting WW3.

Either you need new glasses and hearing aids or you’re deliberately promoting fake news. Either way you said nothing about joining the forum to try to play gotcha as a Democrat supporter. The folks here know where to find unbiased vids and info.
Post your raw video. As I have said before all the videos that I watched show Vance interrupting. And Vance lied...saying things like Zelensky campaigned for the opposition in PA when he visited a munitions factory in Scranton.

Saying I need glasses and hearing aids isn't appreciated.
… he went to a Democratic campaign event. I don’t think foreign leaders should be doing that.
Maybe he did. Who knows! The crooked media pushes this narrative. Did you hear the rumours?
0 x
Ken
Posts: 21863
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: Lily philips and the disgrace of pornography

Post by Ken »

JohnH wrote: ↑Fri Apr 25, 2025 5:44 pm
Ken wrote: ↑Fri Apr 25, 2025 5:33 pmThe FBI and other law enforcement agencies says the law extends to AI imagery of child porn (or child porn using actors over 18 who look like children) because even if no minors were involved in the production, the distribution of such porn still fosters an environment in which the sexual exploitation of children is normalized.
... which is entirely a matter of freedom of speech for adults (assuming they're the ones running the AI software), and has nothing to do with children doing or not doing anything.
Free speech is not a universal and unlimited right.
Ah, interesting. So it WOULD be possible to outlaw pornography, then?
If that is the windmill you want to spend your life tilting at then go for it.

Maybe you can join forces with the other naïve folks who think if they just try hard enough they can get the US to look like Japan when it comes to firearms laws and firearm ownership. Which is theoretically possible too, just not very likely.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
Ernie
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:21 pm
Affiliation: Anabaptist Umbrella

Re: briar patch

Post by Ernie »

Bootstrap wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:16 pmHere's one thing that happens a lot on MN: two different people each think the other person is thinking this way, neither thinks they themselves are thinking this way. I think you and I had a little of this on the Early Writings thread.
I know it felt like a lot of assumptions were being made about my thinking that I wasn't thinking.
I am not aware that I was making assumptions about other people's thinking.
1 x
A wee little man can’t say, I’m sorry. A big man owns his mistakes and apologizes.
A wee little man trusts himself and his own discernment. A big man is humble enough to know that he needs the counsel and input of others.
Bootstrap
Posts: 3828
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 3:38 pm
Affiliation: Virginia Conference

Re: briar patch

Post by Bootstrap »

Ernie wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 8:21 pm
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:16 pmHere's one thing that happens a lot on MN: two different people each think the other person is thinking this way, neither thinks they themselves are thinking this way. I think you and I had a little of this on the Early Writings thread.
I know it felt like a lot of assumptions were being made about my thinking that I wasn't thinking.
I am not aware that I was making assumptions about other people's thinking.
I think you may have assumed I was making assumptions about your thinking that I wasn't making. And sometimes that's what makes conversations hard on MN. People seem very concerned about what others think about them, more than whatever topic we are discussing. I get lost in all the questions of who is assuming what about who is assuming what about who is assuming what about whom.

It's a lot easier to just discuss the subject, providing information for or against a particular understanding. Assuming it's not about you or me.
0 x
1. Are we discussing the topic? Good.
2. Are we going around and around in a fight? Let's stop doing that.
3. Is there some serious wrongdoing or relational injury? Let's address that, probably not in public and certainly not for show.
JayP
Posts: 863
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2023 4:51 pm
Affiliation: RCC

Re: Pilgrim Conference split

Post by JayP »

I am still laughing too hard to write a reasonable response.

I think JohnH posted three times in a row. What talent.
He used to just argue with us, now he can do it all by himself.

The rare marooning you log in and don’t see a response by him on EVERY thread is such a nice day.
0 x
JohnH
Posts: 9519
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:00 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite Church

Re: Pilgrim Conference split

Post by JohnH »

JayP wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 7:58 pm I am still laughing too hard to write a reasonable response.

I think JohnH posted three times in a row. What talent.
He used to just argue with us, now he can do it all by himself.

The rare marooning you log in and don’t see a response by him on EVERY thread is such a nice day.
Thanks, JayP.
0 x
Grace
Posts: 4692
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:26 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Affiliation: Mennonite

Re: Illegal alien arrivals now greater than American births?

Post by Grace »

Board guidelines:
-Use I statements. Speak for yourself and don't decide what someone else is meaning to say or exaggerate what someone else posts.
-Do not state that someone else is wrong. State your own thoughts and opinions.
-Do not take another's statement and distort it to an extreme.

LOL...I won't even begin to count how many guidelines violations the prior post contains.

Just saying, so carry on.
2 x
Valerie
Posts: 3009
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 9:01 am
Affiliation: Non-denom4F

Re: Epstein documents released

Post by Valerie »

ohio jones wrote: ↑Thu Jul 24, 2025 10:55 am
temporal1 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 24, 2025 10:11 am In my view, teachers should compliment Grace on her writing, even if not in agreement with content.
You would benefit from her example.
How kind. Temp pays Grace a deserved compliment and is met by an insult from a moderator ?
Last week you criticized Grace-
I’m used to being mocked for my typos but I sense some bias here.
2 x
Post Reply