Well, I think our practice is a good one and that other groups would be wise to adopt it. Perhaps it would also be good, though, to switch from complex hard-to-make organdy kapps to a somewhat plainer and simpler style.
Time for a headcovering thread!
-
Josh
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
0 x
-
Soloist
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
I think having 1 style for church and one style for elsewhere is suggestive that there is a belief that one is a covering and one is an identifier.
I don’t see it as a good practice to have a separation between Sunday and other days.
That being said, I am pretty positive that the original Anabaptists did not wear these expensive mesh caps. I can see a soft cap as historical.
If the veil is objectionable, the soft cap shouldn’t be.
0 x
-
Josh
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
The one for Sunday is simply more formal and also expresses the importance of a proper covering for worship where prayer and prophecy are definitely expected to be happening. The everyday kapp is simpler and expresses more of a desire to be a simple covering for the kind of prayer that happens throughout the day. (In older days, women would don simple veils during morning devotions, and some families still do that.)Soloist wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:08 amI think having 1 style for church and one style for elsewhere is suggestive that there is a belief that one is a covering and one is an identifier.
I don’t see it as a good practice to have a separation between Sunday and other days.
That being said, I am pretty positive that the original Anabaptists did not wear these expensive mesh caps. I can see a soft cap as historical.
If the veil is objectionable, the soft cap shouldn’t be.
The current kapp actually evolved from the same babushka styles worn for church except folded up to be more practical for everyday wear.
0 x
-
Soloist
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
I don’t doubt the reasoning, I object to it.Josh wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:19 am
The one for Sunday is simply more formal and also expresses the importance of a proper covering for worship where prayer and prophecy are definitely expected to be happening. The everyday kapp is simpler and expresses more of a desire to be a simple covering for the kind of prayer that happens throughout the day. (In older days, women would don simple veils during morning devotions, and some families still do that.)
The current kapp actually evolved from the same babushka styles worn for church except folded up to be more practical for everyday wear.
I favor Justin Martyrs logic of every day is a day to the Lord. Creating additional symbolism to make a holy day isn’t what I would chose.
0 x
-
ohio jones
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
I recall years ago on MD one of the ladies (probably AnabaptistEnigma) mentioned that she stopped by Wal-Mart and picked up several coverings.
0 x
-
Soloist
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
I can only think of corny jokesohio jones wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 1:12 pm I recall years ago on MD one of the ladies (probably AnabaptistEnigma) mentioned that she stopped by Wal-Mart and picked up several coverings.
0 x
-
HondurasKeiser
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
Add that to "The People of Walmart".ohio jones wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 1:12 pmI recall years ago on MD one of the ladies (probably AnabaptistEnigma) mentioned that she stopped by Wal-Mart and picked up several coverings.
0 x
-
Heirbyadoption
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
I'm curious if anybody here can direct us to the earliest Anabaptist records or mandates for a denomination/group identifying style of covering/cap/kapp, ie when this sort of thing shifted from sisters wearing a (perhaps Swiss or German) cultural style to a group identifying style...?Soloist wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:08 amI think having 1 style for church and one style for elsewhere is suggestive that there is a belief that one is a covering and one is an identifier...
That being said, I am pretty positive that the original Anabaptists did not wear these expensive mesh caps. I can see a soft cap as historical. If the veil is objectionable, the soft cap shouldn’t be.
0 x
-
Soloist
Re: Time for a headcovering thread!
Wife: I can't direct you to a record (it may be in one of the books at the Hopewell OR library), but I believe I either read or had a bishop tell me that the Protestants switched from a veil to a capp/bonnet after their split from the Catholics to differentiate themselves from the Catholics. That's why a few people at least justify it. I'm pretty sure some book I read said that Amish used to wear this weird sunhat/droopy sombrero type style and were resistant to changing at one point. No actual reference since I don't remember the book, but maybe someone with resources can look into it.Heirbyadoption wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 2:02 pmI'm curious if anybody here can direct us to the earliest Anabaptist records or mandates for a denomination/group identifying style of covering/cap/kapp, ie when this sort of thing shifted from sisters wearing a (perhaps Swiss or German) cultural style to a group identifying style...?Soloist wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:08 amI think having 1 style for church and one style for elsewhere is suggestive that there is a belief that one is a covering and one is an identifier...
That being said, I am pretty positive that the original Anabaptists did not wear these expensive mesh caps. I can see a soft cap as historical. If the veil is objectionable, the soft cap shouldn’t be.
0 x
-
Ernie