Yes. I think Nationwide and more conservative groups, including the Amish, have a more respectable position. So also those that permit buying clothing off a rack for both sexes.Soloist wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:46 amSo do you think its better for Nationwide and the more conservative groups that have hairstyle requirements for the men, suspenders, plain suit outside of church?joshuabgood wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:41 am
No. I don't have hostility. And no, mass produced clothes are not morally superior.
I have issues with a culture that has one set of applications and standards and expectations for women, but another for those in power. I was raised this way. I don't think it is ideal and maybe not even right.
The Amish clearly have defined expectations on clothing for both women and men but I suspect they fail somewhere too in your reasoning and the real focus you would have is more of a direction of women submitting to men and you would hold a egalitarian view that the husband and the wife mutually submit to each other and make decisions jointly instead of the man having the final authority.
Feel free to tell me I'm wrong in my perception of you.
I am against patriarchism if that is what you mean. And yes, I think a culture which has a lot of demands around how women present, but have no issues with a late model pick-up truck with chrome, or a new home with granite counter=tops, or a big bank account --- is in fact an unhealthy one.
In some cultures, spending $25 dollars by a young girl to get her nails painted would result in a meeting with preachers. However even an older man buying late model say $20K (or more) pick up truck is considered acceptable.