Josh wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2023 11:28 pm
Ken wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2023 10:34 pm
Responding to Josh who claims that the homeless are that way because they choose not to follow society's rules. Here is an article published yesterday (emphasis mine):
Ken, try to stay on topic - the only people sleeping on the street in SF are those who choose to refuse housing first options
and don’t want to accept services like rehab or other addiction / mental health services. (Around 50% of the house less population of SF does accept these things.)
The mayor currently is expressing exasperation and is trying to figure out how to basically force these people into accepting drug rehab and mental health treatment. Basically, it is not good for addicts and the mentally ill to just be freely living in the street.
Despite attempts to do things like create public bathrooms there is a real problem with poor sanitation because of simple refusal by a small section of the population not to go to the bathroom in public sidewalks. I think it is appropriate for society to regulate such things.
So oddly enough I find myself aligned with mainstream Democrats in CA, and very much not aligned with the radical extreme-progressive wing which seems to think it’s wrong to expect decent behaviour and respect at all.
Again, I don't think you understand what "housing first" policies actually are.
There are at least four overlapping categories of homeless (probably more):
1. Those who are essentially functional people who through a series of circumstances or misfortune have lost their homes and have no resources to turn to.
2. Those who are substance abusers who's addiction prevents them from being functional individuals
3. Those with mental health problems who's pathologies prevent them from being functional individuals
4. Those who are criminal predators who find it convenient and profitable to blend in with homeless populations as camouflage. These are folks like the roving bands of bike thieves and catalytic converter thieves who move from place to place, often living out of cars or vans or RVs.
Housing first policies are only going to help those in category #1 and only if there is actually housing available. Which mostly there is not. Housing first policies are a disaster for the other three categories of homeless.
And note, I'm distinguishing between housing and temporary shelter here because 'Housing First" policies also make that distinction. Housing first policies of the sort that you are referencing in San Francisco are not about providing shelter beds. They are about FIRST providing permanent housing to people BEFORE you address their addictions and mental health issues. That is where the FIRST comes from in the name. Such policies usually end in disaster for all involved.