I can't provide a link - you'll have to ask Ernie.Bootstrap wrote:Could you please quote the paragraph you are objecting to and provide a link? I think it's important to evaluate this in his own words.Wade wrote:Dr. John compares the injection of substances and their amounts directly into the body with a needle with eating... This type of logic is so flawed and ridiculous coming from a doctor I don't know why people accept such garbage? To me it seems very intellectually dishonest and I don't trust people who talk like this.Ernie wrote:I was just introduced to Dr. John's blog by someone else this evening. Yes, it is very good IMO.
But here is the quote from the email link from Ernie:
The way a body reacts to ingestion and a needle injection are two different things because of the bodies natural barriers it uses to protect itself. I've called out medical professionals on this before who afterward agreed it wasn't fair of them to compare the two, the problem is that this kind of dishonest illogical science is rampant in the medical world. I'm not debating this - I would just love to see honest comparisons by doctors and nurses one day.Vaccines do contain preservatives, they contain
tiny amounts of formaldehyde and aluminum.
This all sounds terrible and many have claimed
that they are dangerous. The only thing is that
we live in a world that is pretty toxic. A breast
fed baby will get more aluminum in a couple of
days than is present in any vaccine on the
market. Fortunately, our bodies break down
the tiny amounts of toxins present in our
environment and diet very quickly.
Mercury is notably absent from most vaccines
at this point -- only present in multi-dose vials.