Can you tell us more about the unintended consequences?Jazman wrote: ↑Wed May 13, 2026 12:37 pmThis could be spun off into a whole other discussion... I can see sadness on both sides... my own family story testifies to the unintended consequences of 8th grade only vs at least a HS education. I think some OO Amish would benefit from some HS education in their own schools or maybe home school style after the 1-room 8th grade only... (I would disagree somewhat with Kraybill's assertion in this piece, for ex this - “They’re creative, they’re savvy. They're doing well. So why would [they] need more than eighth grade?” Kraybill asks.
But why not send their children past the eighth grade in their own schools?
It's simply not necessary for their way of life, he says. It works for them." (Some of their businesses and its necessary interaction with the "English" world might strain this, if not now, maybe sometime, soon?)
Anyway back to the OP...
Are there any Amish groups who forbid their young people from doing high school at home?
My children learned all they "need " to know in eight grades in order to function in society. I'm glad they are getting an additional 4 years, to help with their personal development and to get introduced to more fields of knowledge.
My children can go to college if they want. At this point they do not see a need for it.
If Anabaptist parents are forbidding their children from doing high school at home, I can see that as being problematic for at least some individuals. But I am not sure how waiting until they are 18 to do high school will disadvantage them greatly in the long term. There are other things to learn outside of formal schooling in the teen years that is invaluable for life.