Mark 7:9-13 and pacifism

Christian ethics and theology with an Anabaptist perspective
ken_sylvania
Posts: 2241
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:41 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite

Re: Mark 7:9-13 and pacifism

Post by ken_sylvania »

Ernie wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 4:20 pm(BTW, the new communist edition of the Bible says that the Jews didn't stone her so Jesus did. They can't tolerate a book that allows for mercy.)
Can you elaborate? Is this real?
0 x
Ernie
Posts: 3466
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:21 pm
Affiliation: Anabaptist Umbrella

Re: Mark 7:9-13 and pacifism

Post by Ernie »

ken_sylvania wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 5:21 pm
Ernie wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 4:20 pm(BTW, the new communist edition of the Bible says that the Jews didn't stone her so Jesus did. They can't tolerate a book that allows for mercy.)
Can you elaborate? Is this real?
https://www.mnnonline.org/news/ccp-spon ... es-john-8/

https://www.ucanews.com/news/chinese-ca ... nner/89619

https://bitterwinter.org/ccp-rewriting- ... -adultery/
0 x
A wee little man can’t say, I’m sorry. A big man owns his mistakes and apologizes.
A wee little man trusts himself and his own discernment. A big man is humble enough to know that he needs the counsel and input of others.
ken_sylvania
Posts: 2241
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:41 pm
Affiliation: Mennonite

Re: Mark 7:9-13 and pacifism

Post by ken_sylvania »

Ernie wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 5:22 pm
ken_sylvania wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 5:21 pm
Ernie wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 4:20 pm(BTW, the new communist edition of the Bible says that the Jews didn't stone her so Jesus did. They can't tolerate a book that allows for mercy.)
Can you elaborate? Is this real?
https://www.mnnonline.org/news/ccp-spon ... es-john-8/

https://www.ucanews.com/news/chinese-ca ... nner/89619

https://bitterwinter.org/ccp-rewriting- ... -adultery/
The articles all seem to be based on a revision of the John 8 account that appeared in a Chinese textbook but no real details about whether or not it was presented as an actual excerpt from the Bible, and none of the reporting seems to be based on any evidence that this is actually from the new Communist party version. Am I missing something?
0 x
Post Reply