I am very sorry about that, Ken. My wife and I have also experienced 2 miscarriages and they were deeply tragic. Likewise, nothing is more joyous than the news that my wife is pregnant. That joy and that tragedy are indicators of our innate recognition that a new life, unique to our own, is at work independent of whether or not we believe it's endowed with a soul, is wanted or is in some way deformed.Ken wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 1:23 pmMy wife's first two pregnancies ended in miscarriages.HondurasKeiser wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 11:02 amI wonder if when your wife first became pregnant with your daughters that you thought of them as akin to and of equal value with skin cells or with the similar disregard that we treat hair follicles?Ken wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 5:23 pm
You kill thousands of human cells every time you scratch your nose or sneeze. Your body sheds about 50 billion human cells every day. Does that make you a mass murderer? Those cells have a nucleus with chromosomes, a cell membrane, organelles like mitochondria and ribosomes exactly like a human zygote. Genetically speaking they are identical to a human zygote with the same number of chromosomes and DNA. They can even be cloned and induced to reproduce.
Scientifically speaking (and I note we are big on science when it comes to defining male and female) there is no beginning to a human life. Life is not linear, it is a cycle. Every living cell including human zygotes come from the division of other living cells. Sperm and eggs are just as alive as a fertilized zygote. And they all came from the division of other living cells in an endless cycle back to the dawn of time.
So again, what makes a human zygote different from any other human body cell, or from sperm and egg cells for that matter? It is just a cell with a nucleus and DNA like any other. It has no tissue, no sensory organs, no nervous system, no brain cells. It is not self-aware. Functionally speaking it is no different from a protozoa. And about three fourths of them die naturally without any human intervention.
I don't have all the answers as to when in the cycle of life a single cell or cluster of cells becomes a self-aware human being with a soul. But then neither does religion or the law. I personally do not believe that a human being develops a soul until it is developed enough to be self aware and capable of thought and sensation. So no, I don't believe single cells or microscopic clusters of undifferentiated cells have souls. Any more than sperm or eggs have soul despite the fact that they are clearly living and human. But I also don't try to impose that view on anyone else. That is the difference.
I'm curious about this phrase: "I personally do not believe that a human being develops a soul until it is developed enough to be self aware and capable of thought and sensation."
Psychology tells me that self-awareness begins around 9 months. Is that what you mean then, that babies younger than 9 months are soul-less?