temporal1 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 2:06 pm
Bootstrap wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:31 am
barnhart wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 1:34 pm
Pray for him to repent and turn to a life of obedience to King Jesus, refrain from expressing disapproval in terms that are dehumanizing (ethnic or racial slurs, animal comparisons) or claiming he is possessed or under the direct control of Satan, don't claim specific knowledge of his motives, don't express wishes of evil on him, pray for him as you would your own brother who has fallen into deception and sin.
This seems right to me.
In addition, I would say this: we do not need to applaud his actions to love him. Love does not mean closing our eyes to wrongdoing.
If I were closer to him, I would have additional ways to love Putin, but he doesn't talk to me, there's nothing I know of that I can do for him in a constructive way.
I think we also have to love the victims of this war, which is being fought in Ukraine. I can do that by caring for refugees, sending blankets and food and other non-military aid via groups I trust not to use it for military ends, and praying for them too. As far as I know, Putin already has blankets and a safe place to sleep.
i see this as a significant change for you, hopefully acknowledging that (Josh and others) are not guilty of siding with or promoting putin because they question whether immediate hi-stakes military response was THE BEST AND ONLY possible response.
I think this is more or less what I have been saying all along. And I know we talk past each other quite a bit.
I don't think I have objected to people asking whether a military response was the best and only possible response. I think I have objected to things like this:
Referring to mike’s post, P.222, about putin’s attempt at a ceasefire, there was NO reference to Christianity, i just happened to think of the Epiphany - which is probably observed on a later day in Russia? Jan 19? Not Jan 6. i added that every moment is one to pray for resolution, in my view.
If Ukraine ends with the West, they will be flying gaudy rainbow flags of some variation, they just keep getting uglier; Ukranian lives might be more familiar to them, in religion and culture, if they end in part or more with Russia. imho.
To me, at least, it often feels as though you and Josh don't express a lot of sympathy for the victims of the war. When you say things like what I just quoted, it seems to imply that Putin is doing the right thing by invading them, that there's some justification for unilaterally invading them and decimating the country. I find it strange that you speak out so loudly against defensive war, but not against an invasion.
To me, it often feels like you express a lot of sympathy for Putin and very little for his victims. Maybe that's not what you intend, maybe I'm not reading you accurately, but that's what I am responding to. I think we would find more common ground if you would chime in with concern for the real victims of this war.
temporal1 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 25, 2022 8:36 pm
The U.S. sees Putin/Russia as its enemy, and appears committed to (annihilation) using Ukraine as its battleground.
That makes no sense to me. If the battleground is Ukraine, then only Ukraine can be annihilated. Russia seems safe and secure. We don't see military forces trying to annihilate Russia. Nobody is sending cruise missiles to decimate Moscow. Nobody is trying to make sure that the citizens of Moscow do not have heat or power in the midst of winter.
Russia is not the battleground, Ukraine is. And it wasn't Ukraine's choice.