Bunny Trails

[JohnL]

Yep. It’s a way to convert and force the rest of us to comply with Islam.

Another article. I know the direction Islam is compelled to take the world, heard it from their own mouths. I do not blame a governor for saying “not in my state will you push this”

https://americarenewing.com/issues/poli ... haria-law/

[barnhart]

Another article. I know the direction Islam is compelled to take the world, heard it from their own mouths. I do not blame a governor for saying “not in my state will you push this”

https://americarenewing.com/issues/poli ... haria-law/

So the law is to prevent Islamic law in the future?

[ohio jones]

There are many things happening in America I never thought would- but Sharia law is something that is & will be pushed if you get enough of s population that can vote for it or politicians. Governor DeSantis is not ignorant to this, thus the legislation.

If enough of s population is in favor, they can overturn this recent law or elect politicians who will.

[temporal1]

There are many things happening in America I never thought would- but Sharia law is something that is & will be pushed if you get enough of s population that can vote for it or politicians. Governor DeSantis is not ignorant to this, thus the legislation.

If enough of s population is in favor, they can overturn this recent law or elect politicians who will.

correct. there is no little effort being made to control elections, by every means possible, there are several means possible.
including tampering with populations.

this is a problem i have with organized politics.
the purpose is to thwart majorities for both control of laws+governments AND access to the public treasury.

i just don’t see this as in the spirit of the founders, or in scriptures.
it’s definitely in the spirit of fallible human reasoning along with schools of human crafted law.

i just heard yesterday, “Rules for Radicals” is an infamous book written by an atheist, who dedicated it to satan. (true?)
i haven’t read the book, i’ve heard it referenced over decades. Chicago-centric.

it’s hard to keep up with all the pitfalls. or, to avoid them.

[temporal1]

There are many things happening in America I never thought would- but Sharia law is something that is & will be pushed if you get enough of s population that can vote for it or politicians. Governor DeSantis is not ignorant to this, thus the legislation.

If enough of s population is in favor, they can overturn this recent law or elect politicians who will.

correct. there is no little effort being made to control elections, by every means possible, there are several means possible.
including tampering with populations.

this is a problem i have with organized politics.
the purpose is to thwart majorities for both control of laws+governments AND access to the public treasury.

i just don’t see this as in the spirit of the founders, or in scriptures.
it’s definitely in the spirit of fallible human reasoning along with schools of human crafted law.

i just heard yesterday, “Rules for Radicals” is an infamous book written by an atheist, who dedicated it to satan. (true?)
i haven’t read the book, i’ve heard it referenced over decades. Chicago-centric.

it’s hard to keep up with all the pitfalls. or, to avoid them.

P.5 / https://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.ph ... 0&start=40
Dr Taylor Marshall describes some history of “Rules for Radicals”. Unpleasant.

[ken_sylvania]

Muslims believe their law is superior and that killing Christians, honor killings and killing anyone who disagrees with them is allowed. Banning Sharia Law makes it clear that it cannot be used as an excuse for murder.

And apparently, American "Christians" believe their law is superior and that killing Iranians, "honorable" killings in war and killing anyone who gets in the way of their global ambitions is allowed.

[JohnL]

And apparently, American "Christians" believe their law is superior and that killing Iranians, "honorable" killings in war and killing anyone who gets in the way of their global ambitions is allowed.

Wow that’s a heck of a leap into generalized assumptions. We’re talking about a state law within the USA jurisdiction and not warfare that has other causes on foreign soil.

[barnhart]

And apparently, American "Christians" believe their law is superior and that killing Iranians, "honorable" killings in war and killing anyone who gets in the way of their global ambitions is allowed.

Wow that’s a heck of a leap into generalized assumptions. We’re talking about a state law within the USA jurisdiction and not warfare that has other causes on foreign soil.

It is a generalization but not that big. The President who speaks casually about killing civilians in Iran controls the party in majority control in all branches of Government and has twice won election. His majority party could easily stop the war if only a few senators and representatives would break with him. It fair to say this war, the style of the war, the department carrying it out and the cabinet have little reserve about killing Iranian civilians.

[JohnH]

And apparently, American "Christians" believe their law is superior and that killing Iranians, "honorable" killings in war and killing anyone who gets in the way of their global ambitions is allowed.

Wow that’s a heck of a leap into generalized assumptions. We’re talking about a state law within the USA jurisdiction and not warfare that has other causes on foreign soil.

It is a generalization but not that big. The President who speaks casually about killing civilians in Iran controls the party in majority control in all branches of Government and has twice won election. His majority party could easily stop the war if only a few senators and representatives would break with him. It fair to say this war, the style of the war, the department carrying it out and the cabinet have little reserve about killing Iranian civilians.

… there has been great restraint to prevent civilian bloodshed at the cost of military objectives. I think that’s a pretty unfair accusation.

[Valerie]

And apparently, American "Christians" believe their law is superior and that killing Iranians, "honorable" killings in war and killing anyone who gets in the way of their global ambitions is allowed.

Wow that’s a heck of a leap into generalized assumptions. We’re talking about a state law within the USA jurisdiction and not warfare that has other causes on foreign soil.

Welcome to Mennonet