speaking only for myself, i had never known of "plain Catholics," before max joined MD.
i find max interesting and authentic to his stated faith.
for me, if there are only 1 or 2 individuals who use this term, i accept it, based on their word.
on MD, it's acceptable to call oneself Anabaptist by theology while not being a member of any Anabaptist group, and, even while being a member of another denom, altogether.
i find, on MN, what a person believes and lives is accepted at face value.
MN, like MD, is not a church.
why would max be held to another standard? why do these questions repeat?
i understand him to also speak of Christians, in general, just as others do on this forum.
i do not question he is a Christian.
different groups use the term, "plain," meanings vary, even within the umbrella name, Anabaptist.
other, non-Christian, religions also use plain dress; some more modest/covering than Anabaptist choices.
max, please let me know if i have speaken out of turn. this is yet another bunny trail.
if so, i would welcome a trip to Brier Island.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)