Transition to a more *liberal* church??

When it just doesn't fit anywhere else.
Post Reply
ken_sylvania
Posts: 4241
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:46 pm
Affiliation: CM

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by ken_sylvania »

Pagan - a person holding religious beliefs other than those of the main world religions.
No, I'm not aware of any Anabaptist people who believe that babies can be pagan. In fact, we quite earnestly believe that babies are incapable of holding a religious belief.
0 x
Neto
Posts: 4734
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 5:43 pm
Location: Holmes County, Ohio
Affiliation: Gospel Haven

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by Neto »

Merriam-Webster:
1 : heathen; especially: a follower of a polytheistic religion (as in ancient Rome)
2 : one who has little or no religion and who delights in sensual pleasures and material goods : an irreligious or hedonistic person
In a sense this definition would exclude animists, because they really don't believe in 'gods', but rather just 'spirits'. If I had made up my own definition w/o looking it up, or seeing the one already posted, I would have tended to write it from the Christian perspective, as in 'one who does not believe in the One True God as revealed in Scripture'.
0 x
Congregation: Gospel Haven Mennonite Fellowship, Benton, Ohio (Holmes Co.) a split from Beachy-Amish Mennonite.
Personal heritage & general theological viewpoint: conservative Mennonite Brethren.
Valerie
Posts: 5388
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:59 am
Location: Medina OH
Affiliation: non-denominational

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by Valerie »

Hats Off wrote:We frequently hear that we are all born with an Adamic nature - but we would not call our babies pagan. Our 19th grandchild, a girl, was born yesterday and we consider her sweet, not pagan!
Thank you- and congratulations! Haitabu's comment about that, really didn't sit well with me- we are made in the image of God and yes, descendants of Adam- even Adam believed in God, and was not pagan, but we suffer the consequences of the fall with sin in our lives.
0 x
Valerie
Posts: 5388
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:59 am
Location: Medina OH
Affiliation: non-denominational

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by Valerie »

ken_sylvania wrote:
Pagan - a person holding religious beliefs other than those of the main world religions.
No, I'm not aware of any Anabaptist people who believe that babies can be pagan. In fact, we quite earnestly believe that babies are incapable of holding a religious belief.
Thank you-
0 x
Valerie
Posts: 5388
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:59 am
Location: Medina OH
Affiliation: non-denominational

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by Valerie »

ken_sylvania wrote:
Pagan - a person holding religious beliefs other than those of the main world religions.
No, I'm not aware of any Anabaptist people who believe that babies can be pagan. In fact, we quite earnestly believe that babies are incapable of holding a religious belief.
Thank you-
0 x
Valerie
Posts: 5388
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:59 am
Location: Medina OH
Affiliation: non-denominational

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by Valerie »

Neto wrote:Merriam-Webster:
1 : heathen; especially: a follower of a polytheistic religion (as in ancient Rome)
2 : one who has little or no religion and who delights in sensual pleasures and material goods : an irreligious or hedonistic person
In a sense this definition would exclude animists, because they really don't believe in 'gods', but rather just 'spirits'. If I had made up my own definition w/o looking it up, or seeing the one already posted, I would have tended to write it from the Christian perspective, as in 'one who does not believe in the One True God as revealed in Scripture'.
Thank you- glad this was cleared up, as I had a hard time with that one-
0 x
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24927
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by Josh »

I have a pretty hard time with the idea anyone is "born Christian". Anabaptism is the antithesis of that concept.
0 x
KingdomBuilder
Posts: 1482
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:00 pm
Affiliation: church of Christ

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by KingdomBuilder »

Maybe pagan is the wrong word, but everyone is born fallen.
0 x
Ponder anew what the Almighty can do
Sudsy
Posts: 6049
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:32 pm
Affiliation: Salvation Army

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by Sudsy »

KingdomBuilder wrote:Maybe pagan is the wrong word, but everyone is born fallen.
Then the question is how fallen are we ? Are we so fallen that as Calvin says, we could not possibly choose to be saved unless God first chooses to give us a new heart that causes us to choose to believe in Him ? Or are we not that fallen and still have the ability to choose to not only do some good but to believe in God and receive a new heart ? Anabaptists and Catholics and other non-determinists believe the latter. Regardless we are all born needing a Saviour.
0 x
Pursuing a Kingdom life in the Spirit
cmbl
Posts: 455
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:07 pm
Affiliation: Pilgrim, NMB
Contact:

Re: Transition to a more *liberal* church??

Post by cmbl »

steve-in-kville wrote:
Josh wrote:Steve,

How do you feel about being in fellowship with churches that have women ministers and fully affirm homosexual behaviour including by ministers?
What's the difference between this and families where the mom "wears the pants" and people that are closet homo's??

I'm half serious and half joking...
This kind of dismissive, cavalier attitude toward sin will ensure that you get all of the above.
0 x
"Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous."
Post Reply