Getting back to AP, I've actually been quite careful to treat it as an independent "thing" and not just devolve into stereotypes about the kind of constituency its founders are part of, although so far those stereotypes seem to have held fast.
This happens so reliably in Anabaptist circles that most of us simply eventually accept that you can judge 90% of an organisation based on the constituency of the people who founded it / run it. Rarely, this isn't the case when someone founds an institution that is at odds with their constituency.
For AP's founders' constituency, it is quite a popular thing to start nonprofits, parachurch organisations, mission organisations, blogs, podcasts, and so on, and so it should not come as a huge surprise when the founders of AP seem to be doing the exact same thing. It's just what they do, almost as reliable as an Old Order person might talk about the Horse Progress. Is it a stereotype? Yes. Does it happen almost every single time you talk long enough? Yes.