Valerie,temporal1 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:14 amall these career politicians have law degrees and/or are surrounded by lawyers.Valerie:
.. this was a ploy from the start. ..
biden has DECADES of experience with SCOTUS. they know exactly what they’re doing.
P.1, look at biden’s stance in 2022 soundly protecting banks, then in 2023 (seeking votes, stirring pots) he’s throwing out promises of FREE STUFF/FREE ED. (not just him, it’s party politics). self-serving and destructive. no shame.
EDUCATION.
a respectable K-12 education would be adequate to teach students to beware liars, empty promises, being led down the garden path.
this would PREVENT them from signing up for egregious debt with no plan or hope of repayment.
instead, wholesale “lambs to the slaughter.”
i agree with you so much so, i seriously wonder why SCOTUS didn’t reject it from consideration based on it being a NUISANCE case?
Viva Frei spells it out: Pelosi, herself, called it from the get-go. That’s a clue.
Viva Frei describes the matter as A LIE .. i agree
“Ignorant students” - Gov ed is failing to prepare students to identify double-talking liars.
The average high school student is capable of understanding what Pelosi stated in a few words: “He doesn’t have the power to do it.”
Talk about creating+abusing PAWNS. Other people’s children.
3 Supreme Court Rulings That ROCKED the Left - Discrimination & Broken Promises! / Viva Frei Vlawg / -13min
(student debt “promise”/lie case begins at 9min)
Found in Comments:
We have it IRT.@MandoMTL WROTE:
Imagine a President actively and openly undermining a pillar of government.
To repeat, SCOTUS should have rejected this as a NUISANCE case to start.
The point was destruction, even of the court, itself. No moral compass.