Re: About face! - Evangelicals and public morality
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:16 pm
I think Jazman is nailing it on this thread
Where Mennonites and others connect
https://forum.mennonet.com/
Yes. Gay marriage.Jazman wrote:... I mean this moral-character-in-our-leaders has been a rock, at least verbally, for 30-50yrs and now suddenly it's not! Frankly I can't think of too many political/cultural/religious entities that have done something like that in such a short space of time...can you?
Just like the Democrats went from DOMA to its repeal in 17 years, I expect those Republicans who aren't already so to become supportive of gay marriage eventually at least as a matter of public policy. Trump welcomed LGBTs into the party officially in his acceptance speech at the convention. It is amazing how many evangelicals ignore this issue in their support of Trump.Bootstrap wrote:Yes. Gay marriage.Jazman wrote:... I mean this moral-character-in-our-leaders has been a rock, at least verbally, for 30-50yrs and now suddenly it's not! Frankly I can't think of too many political/cultural/religious entities that have done something like that in such a short space of time...can you?
Point taken, although 17yrs is a good bit longer than 1-2yrs... Were Dems as solidly, at least verbally, pro-family even before DOMA - in comparison to the religious right's emphasis on leaders'-moral-character? I think the examples you brought are close to equivalents and maybe some stats from the past would show a good equivalence...mike wrote:Just like the Democrats went from DOMA to its repeal in 17 years, I expect those Republicans who aren't already so to become supportive of gay marriage eventually at least as a matter of public policy. Trump welcomed LGBTs into the party officially in his acceptance speech at the convention. It is amazing how many evangelicals ignore this issue in their support of Trump.
I doubt it. I don't think that DOMA meant the Dems were really against gay marriage anyway. More to do with political pressures at the time, and possibly heading off what they thought might be something worse from the Republicans. It is hard to believe that, according the article linked in the previous sentence, in 1996 only 30% of people in California were in favor of allowing homosexual unions. How things have changed.Jazman wrote:Were Dems as solidly, at least verbally, pro-family even before DOMA - in comparison to the religious right's emphasis on leaders'-moral-character?
Trump decided to run strictly on economics and non moral national policy and stayed entirely out of culture war issues like gay marriage and abortion.Jazman wrote:Point taken, although 17yrs is a good bit longer than 1-2yrs... Were Dems as solidly, at least verbally, pro-family even before DOMA - in comparison to the religious right's emphasis on leaders'-moral-character? I think the examples you brought are close to equivalents and maybe some stats from the past would show a good equivalence...mike wrote:Just like the Democrats went from DOMA to its repeal in 17 years, I expect those Republicans who aren't already so to become supportive of gay marriage eventually at least as a matter of public policy. Trump welcomed LGBTs into the party officially in his acceptance speech at the convention. It is amazing how many evangelicals ignore this issue in their support of Trump.
I'm not sure it's nailing it... more like venting it. There's not a lot of places I have to freely verbalize the frustration I'm having with general american protestant evangelicalism... which is the majority of what surrounds me at work, family and church: (despite claiming "anabaptist", our little LMC church has been and continues to be more white, suburban american protestant evangelical than anything else and this is especially true when it comes to religion/culture/politics).KingdomBuilder wrote:I think Jazman is nailing it on this thread
The most important lesson we should learn is that the church must stand against the way politics has become a religion, and religion has become politics. We can hear this idolatrous pull even in the apocalyptic language used by many in this election—as we have seen in every election in recent years—that this election is our “last chance.” And we can hear it in those who assume that the sort of global upending we see happening in the world—in Europe, in the Middle East, and now in the United States—mean a cataclysm before which we should panic.
Such talk is not worthy of a church that is already triumphant in heaven, and is marching on earth toward the ultimate victory of Jesus Christ. Will we face difficult days ahead? Yes. The religious liberty concerns will continue. The cultural decline we have warned against is now part of every ideological coalition in the country. But the question we must ask is who “we” are.
We are not, first, Republicans or Democrats, conservatives or progressives. We are not even, first of all, the United States of America. We are the church of the resurrected and triumphant Lord Jesus Christ. We have survived everything from the rage of Nero to that of Middle Eastern terrorist cells. We have, in fact, often done best when we are, what one historian calls, the “patient ferment” of a church alive with the gospel.
We can pray and honor our leaders, work with them when we can, while preparing to oppose them when needed. We do not need the influence that comes from being a political bloc. We have more than influence; we have power—the power that comes through the weakness of the crucified.
Our rallying cry is not “Hail to the Chief” but “Jesus is Lord.” Perhaps this electoral shakeup means that President Trump will lead America to be great again. I hope so. But regardless, whatever happens to America, we must seek the Kingdom first again.