New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Christian ethics and theology with an Anabaptist perspective
RZehr
Posts: 7383
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:42 am
Affiliation: Cons. Mennonite

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by RZehr »

Josh wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:05 pm
Ken wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:01 pm
Josh wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 8:15 pm It’s worth noting that Holdemans still hold the stance that simple interest is usury and thus is sin.

In places with hyperinflation like Brazil there are various practical applications to avoid the sin of usury whilst still functioning in the banking system.
Do Holdemans take out mortgages and business loans?
Yes. But we don’t believe we should be charging others and profiting off of usury.
Rent-to-own storage sheds in the Holdeman church is very profitable, and I would say that it is closer to usury than charging a nominal 5% or so simple interest on a loan would be.
Last I checked, rent-to-own works out to 20%-30% interest equivalent.

I’m not saying rent-to-own is evil. But it does show what people are willing to do, even if they won’t charge “interest”.
1 x
Ken
Posts: 16752
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Ken »

Josh wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:05 pm
Ken wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:01 pm
Josh wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 8:15 pm It’s worth noting that Holdemans still hold the stance that simple interest is usury and thus is sin.

In places with hyperinflation like Brazil there are various practical applications to avoid the sin of usury whilst still functioning in the banking system.
Do Holdemans take out mortgages and business loans?
Yes. But we don’t believe we should be charging others and profiting off of usury.
Sounds sort of like the Amish who will grow tobacco but not smoke it.

Either way you are profiting off the "sin" of others or enticing others to "sin" on your behalf.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
Biblical Anabaptist
Posts: 400
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:33 pm
Location: South Central PA
Affiliation: Unaffiliated Menno

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Biblical Anabaptist »

Ken wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:50 pm
My own non-Biblical moral code is that it is unethical or immoral to take advantage of the hardship or misery of others to make money and that is probably what the Bible was talking about. But there is nothing wrong with charging interest at the rate of inflation to account for the deflating value of real goods and coins over time. Nor is there nothing wrong with banks charging interest for ordinary consumer spending like new cars and McMansions in the suburbs or business ventures that are intended to make money. That is just modern finance which has created a free market in money no different from the free market in grains or fruits or meats or textiles that would have existed in any market square or bazar in any Biblical town where people freely traded goods and bargained and haggled for prices.
So if you would have loaned money to someone to buy a house in 2003, would you have written down the principal by 30% when real estate values plunged?
0 x
Soloist
Posts: 5839
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2016 4:49 pm
Affiliation: CM Seeker

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Soloist »

Biblical Anabaptist wrote: Tue Jun 13, 2023 9:23 am So if you would have loaned money to someone to buy a house in 2003, would you have written down the principal by 30% when real estate values plunged?
That’s been my point and so far the answer has been a resounding no.
0 x
Soloist, but I hate singing alone
Soloist, but my wife posts with me
Soloist, but I believe in community
Soloist, but I want God in the pilot seat
Ken
Posts: 16752
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Ken »

Biblical Anabaptist wrote: Tue Jun 13, 2023 9:23 am
Ken wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:50 pm
My own non-Biblical moral code is that it is unethical or immoral to take advantage of the hardship or misery of others to make money and that is probably what the Bible was talking about. But there is nothing wrong with charging interest at the rate of inflation to account for the deflating value of real goods and coins over time. Nor is there nothing wrong with banks charging interest for ordinary consumer spending like new cars and McMansions in the suburbs or business ventures that are intended to make money. That is just modern finance which has created a free market in money no different from the free market in grains or fruits or meats or textiles that would have existed in any market square or bazar in any Biblical town where people freely traded goods and bargained and haggled for prices.
So if you would have loaned money to someone to buy a house in 2003, would you have written down the principal by 30% when real estate values plunged?
No, and neither would I demand a 50% additional interest if the value of the property goes up 50%.

Because I actually think the deeper message of the Biblical teaching against usury is really a commandment about exploiting the poor rather than engaging in a free market for the commodity of money.

Modern finance is really just a market in money no different from a Biblical bazar or marketplace where people freely traded goods like dates, wine, spices, textiles, metal goods, etc. I would imagine that if you were able to go back in time to any marketplace in Biblical times you would see people endlessly haggling over the price of everything and then eventually coming to agreement as to the price that day for peaches or salted fish or saffron or salt or a bolt of silk or linen.

A mortgage is really no different. The bank has a cost of money based a variety of factors such as the Federal Reserve discount rate, the 10-year Treasury Bill rates, the current and anticipated rates of inflation, the strength of the mortgage market, and so forth. So the bank gets the money to loan you at a certain "wholesale" rate and then turns around and loans it to you at a certain "retail" rate which is the interest rate on your mortgage. Part of that interest rate is based on inflation, part is based on the bank's cost of doing business, their rent, employee costs, administrative costs, etc. and part is profit. But most banks also deal in "conforming" mortgages meaning that the match current national interest rates so the mortgages can be resold on the secondary market and so are further constrained in the interest rate and fees that they can charge.

What a bank is doing when they set an interest rate for a home buyer is really no different at all from what a grocer does when they buy eggs from the farmer at a wholesale price and resells them in the grocery store at a higher retail price. The bank is obtaining (buying) the money at a wholesale rate and selling it to the customer at the current retail rate as reflected by the current day's 30-year mortgage rate.

What I think the Bible is really talking about is exploiting the poor. So, for example, payday lenders and loan sharks who charge usurious rates and fees to poor people who are desperate to put food on the table for their families and are not wealthy enough to have ordinary credit cards or a bank balance like most ordinary middle class folks. Those people are taking advantage of the misery and misfortune of others.

I would feel the same way about say a farmer who is exploiting undocumented immigrant labor and/or their children to make a profit off of their desperation by paying below market wages. That is the same exact behavior as a money lender exploiting the desperation of the poor and equally sinful. I do not feel the same way about someone who takes out a 30 year mortgage to buy a beach house and who has the ability to pay the going market rate to borrow the money to do so.
2 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Josh »

Ernie wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:39 pm
Josh wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:05 pm
Ken wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:01 pm Do Holdemans take out mortgages and business loans?
Yes. But we don’t believe we should be charging others and profiting off of usury.
Are Holdemans more likely to form partnerships or invest in a business and less likely to loan money than other plain Anabaptists? No agenda. Just curious.
Loans seem common. Business partnerships are also common.

There isn’t much risk of default on a loan. Loans are made all the time to build church buildings, school buildings, and other types of facilities. The church has a loan program for teachers to take out a loan to buy a car and for young families to get a loan to help buy a house in a new area.
0 x
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Josh »

RZehr wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 10:12 pm Rent-to-own storage sheds in the Holdeman church is very profitable, and I would say that it is closer to usury than charging a nominal 5% or so simple interest on a loan would be.
These rent to own programs are typically offered by a third party and loan options from banks are often offered as well. A buyer can also buy with a credit card.
Last I checked, rent-to-own works out to 20%-30% interest equivalent.

I’m not saying rent-to-own is evil. But it does show what people are willing to do, even if they won’t charge “interest”.
A lot of people prefer rent to own because then when they don’t want it, they quit paying for it and don’t have to pay to have it hauled away. It’s not a mindset I personally share.

I think it is ridiculous to call it “usury”. It is simply renting someone a portable building. Amongst other things, it lacks the character of alienation that happens upon default with a usurious, recourse loan.
0 x
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Josh »

Ken wrote: Tue Jun 13, 2023 12:16 am
Sounds sort of like the Amish who will grow tobacco but not smoke it.

Either way you are profiting off the "sin" of others or enticing others to "sin" on your behalf.
That’s a ridiculous take, frankly. The fact I won’t rip off my neighbour is part and parcel different from allowing the government, banks and so forth to take advantage of me.
1 x
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Josh »

Soloist wrote: Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:46 am
Biblical Anabaptist wrote: Tue Jun 13, 2023 9:23 am So if you would have loaned money to someone to buy a house in 2003, would you have written down the principal by 30% when real estate values plunged?
That’s been my point and so far the answer has been a resounding no.
When real estate values go up, the wealthier lender wins.

When values go down, the wealthy lender also wins.

The poor bear all the risk and the wealthy accumulate all the gains.
2 x
Ken
Posts: 16752
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: New Testament teaching on Interest/Usury

Post by Ken »

Josh wrote: Tue Jun 13, 2023 1:09 pm
Ernie wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:39 pm
Josh wrote: Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:05 pm
Yes. But we don’t believe we should be charging others and profiting off of usury.
Are Holdemans more likely to form partnerships or invest in a business and less likely to loan money than other plain Anabaptists? No agenda. Just curious.
Loans seem common. Business partnerships are also common.

There isn’t much risk of default on a loan. Loans are made all the time to build church buildings, school buildings, and other types of facilities. The church has a loan program for teachers to take out a loan to buy a car and for young families to get a loan to help buy a house in a new area.
What is the point of the church running a loan program for car loans and mortgages when there are so many commercial banks and credit unions available? Doesn't that tie up a lot of church funds that could better put to use in other ways?
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
Post Reply