The True Theological Replacement: How Christian Zionism Substitutes Race for Christ

[Thomas_muntzer]

Zionist/Dispensationalist Theology:

They genuinely believe that the Jewish people are "God's chosen people."
They genuinely believe that the modern state of Israel is the Israel of the Bible.
They genuinely believe that the blessing or curse of Abraham depends on our service to the Jews.
They genuinely believe that they are doing God's work by waging war on behalf of the modern state of Israel.
Theology has political ramifications, whether you like it or not. And dispensationalism, or "Christian Zionism," is a replacement theology:
They have replaced grace with race.
They have replaced Christ with the scotfield bible.
They have replaced the Church with a political state.
They have replaced the Kingdom of Heaven with an earthly kingdom of blasphemers.
They despised the cross of Christ and instead glorified the Star of Bethesda.

Hence the continued bloodshed and the glorification of mass killings, from men to women to children. They do the work not of the Father of Jesus Christ, but of the father of lies, the devil, whom the blasphemous Jews serve. I am not saying this; Jesus Christ is saying it

Before Zionism, Christians and Muslims lived peacefully as neighbors in Palestine and the rest of the Levant. The United States was not spending trillions and sacrificing its soldiers in pointless regime-change wars in the Middle East.

Jerusalem was at peace during Turkish rule in the Ottoman Empire, as well as under the Arab caliphates that preceded them, the reign of the leper king Baldwin IV, and the Byzantine Empire. The establishment of the Zionist political entity has brought nothing but death and horror to the holy land of Jerusalem.

[barnhart]

There is a difference between accepting Jesus as the messianic fulfillment of old testament prophecy and launching into full blown anti-Semitism. This is the latter.

[Thomas_muntzer]

There is a difference between accepting Jesus as the messianic fulfillment of old testament prophecy and launching into full blown anti-Semitism. This is the latter.

Jesus clearly said that the weeds and the wheat grow together. There will come a time when we must choose between worshipping a political state or defending the true Christian faith.

The United States is one step away from launching a ground invasion of Iran on behalf of the Zionist entity, which would imply a military draft since a ground invasion would require at least a million soldiers in Israel. Due to the military defeat and the destruction of the Iron Dome, there is already talk of using the Samson option (using nuclear bombs), which is an official part of the IDF's military doctrine.

Is it anti-Semitic to oppose war? Is it anti-Semitic to oppose a genocide with extensive footage and video records? Criticizing Zionism as a political ideology is not anti-Semitism. Thousands of anti-Zionist rabbis could answer that better.

[barnhart]

You are right, it is not anti-Semitic to oppose war.

Do you think Jews cause war, or when wars are fought Jews are the deep reason?

[Thomas_muntzer]

You are right, it is not anti-Semitic to oppose war.

Do you think Jews cause war, or when wars are fought Jews are the deep reason?

From the dawn of humanity, when Cain killed his brother Abel, violence and war have been a part of human history. Before the gospel of Christ and the good news reached the American continent, there were wars: the Aztecs murdered the Tlaxcalan Indians, the Cherokee killed their tribal rivals, and so on. Wars are not waged by a specific ethnic group (like the Jews); they are part of human nature's inherent malevolence.

Regarding the current war with Iran, which I believe we can confidently say is part of World War III, which in my opinion began with Russia's invasion of Ukraine, I think we need to distinguish between Jews, citizens of the State of Israel, and Israeli politicians.

I currently believe that the war with Iran is due to the ambition, egomania, and corruption of a Zionist politician named Benjamin Netanyahu, who, in order to avoid a corruption trial, has brought his country to the brink of collapse.

[mike]

You are right, it is not anti-Semitic to oppose war.

Do you think Jews cause war, or when wars are fought Jews are the deep reason?

From the dawn of humanity, when Cain killed his brother Abel, violence and war have been a part of human history. Before the gospel of Christ and the good news reached the American continent, there were wars: the Aztecs murdered the Tlaxcalan Indians, the Cherokee killed their tribal rivals, and so on. Wars are not waged by a specific ethnic group (like the Jews); they are part of human nature's inherent malevolence.

Regarding the current war with Iran, which I believe we can confidently say is part of World War III, which in my opinion began with Russia's invasion of Ukraine, I think we need to distinguish between Jews, citizens of the State of Israel, and Israeli politicians.

I currently believe that the war with Iran is due to the ambition, egomania, and corruption of a Zionist politician named Benjamin Netanyahu, who, in order to avoid a corruption trial, has brought his country to the brink of collapse.

If your topic is geopolitics, then this thread should be in current events, or preferably politics, rather than Written Word.

[barnhart]

I currently believe that the war with Iran is due to the ambition, egomania, and corruption of a Zionist politician named Benjamin Netanyahu, who, in order to avoid a corruption trial, has brought his country to the brink of collapse.

There is a lot of blame to lay at his feet for sure but I don't contest the existence of the state of Israel anymore than I contest the existence of Iran. At the same time I have serious criticism of the way Zionism has been carried out in the last 75 years. Perhaps there could have been another way to pursue a Jewish state with more long-term stability built in from the beginning?

[Thomas_muntzer]

You are right, it is not anti-Semitic to oppose war.

Do you think Jews cause war, or when wars are fought Jews are the deep reason?

From the dawn of humanity, when Cain killed his brother Abel, violence and war have been a part of human history. Before the gospel of Christ and the good news reached the American continent, there were wars: the Aztecs murdered the Tlaxcalan Indians, the Cherokee killed their tribal rivals, and so on. Wars are not waged by a specific ethnic group (like the Jews); they are part of human nature's inherent malevolence.

Regarding the current war with Iran, which I believe we can confidently say is part of World War III, which in my opinion began with Russia's invasion of Ukraine, I think we need to distinguish between Jews, citizens of the State of Israel, and Israeli politicians.

I currently believe that the war with Iran is due to the ambition, egomania, and corruption of a Zionist politician named Benjamin Netanyahu, who, in order to avoid a corruption trial, has brought his country to the brink of collapse.

If your topic is geopolitics, then this thread should be in current events, or preferably politics, rather than Written Word.

Barnhart asked about wars, specifically if I believed they were started by Jews. I was asked to state my beliefs, including a war currently taking place in Iran. My post is purely theological, but clearly the doctrine of dispensationalism has political ramifications.

[Thomas_muntzer]

I currently believe that the war with Iran is due to the ambition, egomania, and corruption of a Zionist politician named Benjamin Netanyahu, who, in order to avoid a corruption trial, has brought his country to the brink of collapse.

There is a lot of blame to lay at his feet for sure but I don't contest the existence of the state of Israel anymore than I contest the existence of Iran. At the same time I have serious criticism of the way Zionism has been carried out in the last 75 years. Perhaps there could have been another way to pursue a Jewish state with more long-term stability built in from the beginning?

Yes, perhaps Argentine Patagonia would be a very good place since it wouldn't have territorial conflicts, or after the unfortunate assassination of Prime Minister Isaac Rabin, the two-state solution would have continued.

[barnhart]

A two state solution still seems like a better option than what has been pursued to be sure. It seems to me both Palestinians and Jews have very deep roots there going back thousands of years, I wouldn't say either group should be forced to leave or face annihilation.