Cheering+funding felony crime.

[temporal1]

Hearing: September 29

Lindsay Clancy trial declared a mistrial. What happens next?
The judge set a date of Tuesday, Sept. 29 to determine next steps.
https://abcnews.com/GMA/News/lindsay-cl ... =136153308

After nearly 40 hours of deliberations, the jury in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy was unable to reach a unanimous verdict, resulting in a mistrial.

Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on Friday after a justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court declined to impose an emergency stay in a petition filed by Clancy's attorney, Kevin Reddington

The jury deliberated for seven days after hearing over five weeks of testimony concerning whether or not Clancy was suffering from postpartum psychosis when she strangled her children, and whether she should be held criminally liable for the killings.

Clancy, 36, has pleaded not guilty to three murder charges for the deaths of her 5-year-old daughter Cora, 3-year-old son Dawson and infant son Callan at the family's home in Duxbury, a Boston suburb, on Jan. 24, 2023.

The former nurse attempted suicide on the night of her children's deaths, leaving her paralyzed and in a wheelchair, according to state prosecutors.

Following the mistrial, Clancy will return to a hospital, where she has been under state custody January 2023.

Quickly after declaring a mistrial, Sullivan set a date of Tuesday, Sept. 29 to determine next steps.

ABC News legal analyst Brian Buckmire said the prosecution could make the decision to retry her in the near future,
or choose to drop the case.

On Friday, Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz declined to announce an immediate decision about retrying Clancy.

The second option, according to Buckmire and Peter Elikann, a Boston-based criminal defense attorney,
could be plea negotiations.

"In many cases, the prosecution, after having a deadlocked jury, will kind of say to the defense, 'Let's compromise. We'll break down the charges to something much lesser, and can we agree on that, that you'll plead to something, a much more minor charge,'" Elikann said.

Buckmire said it is possible, however, that prosecutors would not want to lessen any of the charges moving forward.

Clancy faced three counts of first-degree murder in connection with the deaths of her three children.

[temporal1]

i believe the crowd funding goal for LC is $3 million.

Fundraiser for Lindsay Clancy holdout juror, Michael Desronvil, passes $360K
https://www.newsweek.com/fundraiser-for ... k-12463378

This case raises MANY unpleasant questions about juries, courtrooms, legal counsel, publicity, social media.

The way the 3 jurors described themselves and jury deliberations reflects self-assured hive-mind/bullying that has become common; frankly, it seems to run rampant in lib-centric public and higher education. But, those affected seem oblivious.

The 3 female jurors’ voluntary, eager, interviews reflected total oblivion.
Lots of reports describe them (and their MANY tiktok supporters) as “day drinkers” - in olden days, they might have been described as busybodies. i’m thinking of them as tiktok feminists, not in a good way. Those doing or pretending to do or describing desire to sadistically harm their babies - should be investigated. Like anyone recording themselves committing crimes.

The horrors “out there” are hard to witness. So disturbing.

The majority jurors were beyond annoyed Michael D had the nerve to ask for the judge to return to reread some instructions!
While loudly complaining LC asked for help and was (sometimes) denied. Doctors prescribed meds, i presume this means she wasn’t ignored.

As well, the medically trained are conscious of “how to play the game” of medicine and legal culpability.
Lindsay would have known which doctors she could manipulate and how, what to say, what not to say, etc. To get drugs and avoid losing her job, and freedom.

Messed up. Intelligent.

Imagine the evil, ugly, unmerciful face her 3 babies witnessed as they struggled to live.
Not the pretty, well groomed, polite young woman presented in the courtroom. “Not a hair out of place.”

i cannot envision an outcome in which LC would ever leave an asylum or prison, whatever combination.
Similar to the Andrea Yates case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Yates

i don’t think it’s been mentioned in the LC case, but i would think spousal revenge (anger/rage) might have been a factor.
In my view, the nature of the murders screams anger. It’s unlikely small children could foment such deep anger - but -
their defenselessness could provide easy targets to unload rage. In addition to knowing what intense pain their violent deaths would inflict.

So many questions.

[JohnH]

i believe the crowd funding goal for LC is $3 million.

$1 million per child. Killing your own kids is profitable.

The majority jurors were beyond annoyed Michael D had the nerve to ask for the judge to return to reread some instructions!
While loudly complaining LC asked for help and was (sometimes) denied. Doctors prescribed meds, i presume this means she wasn’t ignored.

Lots of people don't get medical help and struggle with mental illness. Very, very few of them go and kill their own kids - or anyone else. Most mentally ill people are peaceful. I see a few in town regularly who have, so far, managed not to kill anybody. (Sometimes they do have to be asked to leave the McDonald's after being there all day.)

i cannot envision an outcome in which LC would ever leave an asylum or prison, whatever combination.
Similar to the Andrea Yates case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Yates

I can. Maybe people are already calling for her to be released.

Meanwhile, her lawyer wants the holdout juror brought up on charges and is also trying to sue him. It is a travesty of justice.

[temporal1]

i believe the crowd funding goal for LC is $3 million.

$1 million per child. Killing your own kids is profitable.

The majority jurors were beyond annoyed Michael D had the nerve to ask for the judge to return to reread some instructions!
While loudly complaining LC asked for help and was (sometimes) denied. Doctors prescribed meds, i presume this means she wasn’t ignored.

Lots of people don't get medical help and struggle with mental illness. Very, very few of them go and kill their own kids - or anyone else. Most mentally ill people are peaceful. I see a few in town regularly who have, so far, managed not to kill anybody. (Sometimes they do have to be asked to leave the McDonald's after being there all day.)

i cannot envision an outcome in which LC would ever leave an asylum or prison, whatever combination.
Similar to the Andrea Yates case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Yates

I can. Maybe people are already calling for her to be released.

Meanwhile, her lawyer wants the holdout juror brought up on charges and is also trying to sue him. It is a travesty of justice.

1) From the little i’ve read, LC’s legal fees are runnng close to the GFM total. Reddington has every incentive to play-up public drama, does he not? (i’d like to see him+all jurors fall under the same legal scrutiny Michael D is (the lone juror).

Who’s on trial here?!

Btw, Reddington is quite accustomed to all of this, the courtroom, jurors, public.
(i’ve often wondered how defense attorneys sleep at night.)

2) Long ago, i concluded “we’re all” mentally ill, just on a spectrum, so to speak.
Seeking help doesn’t have the stigma it once did. Still, it can negatively affect or end some careers.
Medical people know the ins+outs of their work situations, wrt seeking help, also drugs and manipulating the system.

i presume MOST do not abuse the system. Some do. The results are eventually seen, whether through self harm, sometimes patient harm. There is drug abuse in the medical profession, also, suicide. Abusers always try to hide their abuses.

3) It is a travesty of justice.
Some days “things i see” on the internet are so painful to witness, it’s hard to bear.
In this case, seeing the “tiktok feminists” sadistically abusing their infants “for the camera” is nauseating. Chilling.
Some of it is “acting out” horrifying acts “for the camera”. It’s painful to witness.

When i remember what high regard women once held, then to see+hear what social media displays, i’m dumbfounded.

Recently, i saw a little clip of obama (weakly) “waxing poetic” about “if only we could have women running everything for 2 years” .. repulsive. Esp women who are gaga over him! Adoration of gov promoted+funded child sacrifice. The worst of the worst.

All that (what’s become tiktok militant feminism) needs to be dialed ‘way ‘way back. It’s an experiment gone too far.

It’s gotta be Jesus-centric, Jesus-ordered, acknowledging the sanctity of God-created life.
Without, it becames raw paganism swirling around human sacrifice. Now on “Biblical scale”. Global.

God-centric, Jesus-centric, as it has been throughout human history. Hosea, Boaz, others in scripture model The Way.
There were godly men, there are godly men. They don’t get the airtime 1) they deserve AND 2) the world needs.

No matter pretty, well-groomed outward words and appearances. Male or female.
There’s a lot of them out there. Camera-ready evil.

obama shows every sign of need of serious prayer. he appears eaten up with emptiness.

[temporal1]

Several posts here took a distinct “upsing” to this topic .. moved to
Sept 27 / P.8-9:
https://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php?t=71&start=80

[temporal1]

Hearing: September 29 1 hour 7+ min. video below
Hearing: November 2 (Judge: will set second trial date) reddington claims he can’t attend trial before June.

AP Live / “LIVE: Lindsay Clancy hearing after trial ended with deadlocked jury“ / 1hr 7+min

Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer argued Tuesday that there wasn’t enough evidence to prove she killed her three children,
a striking turn after a lengthy trial
that focused more on her mental state
than on whether she took their lives.

Read more here:” ..

My informal time stamps:
12:00 reddington
33:25 prosecution
44:00 defense
56:00 John A. ..
59:00 prosecution
59:55 reddington [execution!!]

1:00:00 judge
Nov 2: set trial date.
reddington: June!
recess

From Seat 33F:
Reddington dramatically emphasizes how “everyone” including President Trump wants LC’s execution (his word).
Massachusetts has NO death penalty, that’s NOT part of the debate (Reddington knows it).
The president CANNOT impact this STATE court (Reddington knows it).

i’m sure the judge is quite aware of the old drama queen.

Honestly, Trump being brought into this case. It doesn’t end.

Ms Lindsay has never looked better. Perfect hair+makeup, lovely lace top. Quiet and attentive, warm demeanor.
A vision of serenity. NOT what her babies last witnessed.

The U.S. court system could not be better to suspects, perpetrators, criminals.
It’s really hard to get it right. God knows. Pray for God’s will.

- - - - - - -

For another topic, i’m just beginning to learn about this:

THEM BEFORE US
Putting Children’s Rights
Before Adult Desires
We speak for children- defending their rights in
technology, policy, and culture.
https://thembeforeus.com/

i need more information, but i think “personhood” legal status for the unborn makes sense.
The sanctity of human life. Conception to natural death.

i’m not generally “for” organized political blocs+lobbies, for instance, i consider myself pro life, not Pro Life.
The problem with political organization is, the temptation for excesses and abuse.