Roe found new constitutional rights that went way beyond historical interpretation, legislating from the bench. Just like recent decisions on guns.
If we don't want legislation from the bench, I think that applies to both.
Roe found new constitutional rights that went way beyond historical interpretation, legislating from the bench. Just like recent decisions on guns.
MaxPC wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 7:00 am I am grateful to the Lord that this has been decided.
Here is the Supreme Court pdf copy of the full decision in 19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson.
The Constitution explicitly mentions a right to bear arms and the country had plenty of historical precedent to exercise this right. If you read Thomas’s decision, he lays out exactly what this historical precedent is.
i would strike out “probably” - and add, this reasoning applies to human law, too. human life at all stages.silentreader wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:02 amSzdfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:40 amThis seems to be an argument from tradition rather from the text itself, which to me seems like an odd argument coming from a literalist “Sola Scriptura” perspective.barnhart wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 7:29 am Hi Franklin, I think you will find from the historical record that objection to infanticide and by extension abortion has its roots in the early church. Historian Tom Holland bears this out in his book "Dominion".
I don't think this value descends from a direct proof text in the New Testament, rather it is the application of the implications of Jesus. If the human form is important enough to contain God himself, it is sacred. This is also the root of other values that have formed the western world like charitable concern for the poor and associated economic "safety nets", radical leveling of social hierarchy (notable in the early church), the equalization of status between men and women, and a belief in the potential of every human.
I recommend Holland's book if you are interested as he carefully charts the rise of these ideas using secular sources.
Franklin has a point. There’s no direct prohibition of abortion in the text.That probably depends on whether you consider abortion to be murder, or the shedding of blood or the taking of life.
Did the amount increase in the surrounding states?
orIf the aborted all end up in heaven then what's the big deal ? Would this not be better than them coming into this world and likely ending up in hell ?
My own view on the overturn of Roe v. Wade will likely do very little to reduce abortions but rather get pro-abortion folks perhaps more organized to help fund people to go to States or Canada where they can have abortions. I don't see this being such a 'big victory' for anti-abortionists in how this practically will turn out. It will be interesting to see how our province, Ontario, responds to those wanting to get their abortion and coming to Ontario.If aborting a child is murder, God will forgive sins, so won't asking forgiveness after aborting still allow one to be saved ?
Illinois is counting on it, invested in it, nothing short of proud of it. Been looking forward to it for years.