I don't know. For the first 9-months of the pandemic we basically has a 50-state experiment on Covid response. Fauci and the CDC made recommendations and such, but almost the entire response was at the state and local level. Unlike most other countries, there weren't any Federal mandates to speak of in terms of shut downs, social distancing, mask use, and such.RZehr wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 1:06 pm A big mistake with the handling of this was simply that far to much focus/consideration/weight was give solely to "fighting" the spread of the virus. It would have been better to take a lot more considerations into account. But that is what you get when you turn the problem over to the Fauci. That is his bailiwick, so of course that is what he is going to focus on. It isn't his job to take all things into consideration. He should have advised, along with many others.
So we can directly compare states like WA and OR which had pretty strict response throughout the pandemic, to states like TX, GA, FL or IA that have had much more relaxed responses with a focus on fast re-opening of the country. Did the states with fast re-opening and less restrictive responses actually do better? That is debatable. The economy here in WA is arguably better right now than in TX. WA state revenues are actually up 2% while in TX they are down about 10%. And the death and infection rates are much lower.
One thing we do know. If the rest of the country had achieved the same infection and death rates as WA then over 300,000 lives would have saved during the pandemic. OR has done even better than WA. Would that have been worth it? Would the economic impacts have been worse? I have no idea. But the fact of the matter is that some states did horribly and others have done quite well.

