Case positivity rates seem to be the best indicator of prevalence in the community. Unlike number of postitves you find, it is independent of sample size. You can change how many you find by changing the amount of testing you do, but no matter how much testing you do (How large your sample size is) the percentage of positives in the community should be reflected by the positivity rate.ken_sylvania wrote:I'd guess the mask compliance rate for PA is less than a 60% compliance rate. Total cases per 1M population in PA are 31,612 compared 34,602 cases per 1M population in MD.Judas Maccabeus wrote:"Just wear the mask." (Marylands governor, Larry Hogan)RZehr wrote:So....we need to now hang bone rattles from our noses?
He reported that surveys show a 96% compliance rate in Maryland, and I believe it as I go about my business. The case positivity rate in MD is at 6.04% Better than PA at 28.95% and VA at 10.69%.
You can debate all you like, but it appears to do something.
J.M.
You can debate all you like, but it appears PA's refusal to mask up is helping somewhat.![]()
OK, well, I don't actually believe that. But I do think it's absurd to suggest that COVID is 5x more prevalent in PA compared to MD.
At least that is what I have been taught.
J.M.