Ivermectin

Things that are not part of politics happening presently and how we approach or address it as Anabaptists.
Szdfan

Re: Ivermectin

Post by Szdfan »

nett wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 9:25 pm At this point 100% of the people I know with serious cases are vaccinated. One of them is in the hospital, the rest are really sick.

It might feel good to pretend like being vaccinated means you won't get a serious case of COVID, but it's not reality.
Whether or not vaccines are effective has nothing to do with the efficacy of Ivermectin.
0 x
temporal1

Re: Ivermectin

Post by temporal1 »

nett wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 9:25 pm
Josh wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 6:36 pm It really is stunning to watch Ken and Bootstrap work so hard to promote... doing absolutely nothing to treat covid at home, before you’re bad enough to need to go to the ER.
At this point 100% of the people I know with serious cases are vaccinated.
One of them is in the hospital, the rest are really sick.

It might feel good to pretend like being vaccinated means you won't get a serious case of COVID, but it's not reality.

i am fully vaccinated, and will probably get the booster, when+if it’s available. my pharmacist told me the booster is exactly the same as the first 2 vaccinations. Moderna.

i’m going through the steps to get a human RX for IVM with a human physician’s order, from a human pharmacy.

from what i’ve read, it seems, everyone is likely to get COVID, the timing and severity are not predictable.
i might get it tomorrow, or in 5 years. i won’t be surprised to get it. i won’t be surprised to die with it.

i’m older, with diabetes, so, i wonder if i might be better to get it sooner rather than later??! i won’t try to get it.
it SEEMS, some strains may be less severe as time goes by, so maybe delaying is best??!

i’m doing all the recommended measures, i mask, maintain physical distance, wash hands.

i don’t appreciate reading that those who “question the powers that be” are all uneducated hayseeds unworthy of being heard.
on this or any topic.
0 x
ohio jones

Re: Ivermectin

Post by ohio jones »

temporal1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 10:22 pm i’m going through the steps to get a human RX for IVM with a human physician’s order, from a human pharmacy.
oh the humanity. :)
0 x
Soloist

Re: Ivermectin

Post by Soloist »

https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/

No endorsement on either side of the debate. I really just don't have the energy to keep discussing covid outside of my narrow focus.
0 x
temporal1

Re: Ivermectin

Post by temporal1 »

Soloist wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 11:56 pm https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/

No endorsement on either side of the debate. I really just don't have the energy to keep discussing covid outside of my narrow focus.
This is an interesting page in your link:
Image
0 x
Soloist

Re: Ivermectin

Post by Soloist »

Its interesting that pharmacists can't refuse to fill scripts, I would have been in favor of allowing freedom to not fill scripts especially since now no Christian who takes a stand on abortion can be a pharmacist unless you are very careful as to where you work.
0 x
User avatar
Robert
Site Janitor
Posts: 12078
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:16 pm
Affiliation: Anabaptist

Re: Ivermectin

Post by Robert »

I can remember growing up and my mother having me gargle hydrogen peroxide when we got sore throats. She also put iodine in our nose to knock out strep throat.

I have left the iodine behind, but gargling peroxide is something I have done from time to time. You never swallow.
0 x
Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
nett
Posts: 1953
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:22 pm
Affiliation: Midwest Fellowship

Re: Ivermectin

Post by nett »

Szdfan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 10:20 pm
nett wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 9:25 pm At this point 100% of the people I know with serious cases are vaccinated. One of them is in the hospital, the rest are really sick.

It might feel good to pretend like being vaccinated means you won't get a serious case of COVID, but it's not reality.
Whether or not vaccines are effective has nothing to do with the efficacy of Ivermectin.
I'm not the one that related the two, Ken is.
0 x
temporal1

Re: Ivermectin

Post by temporal1 »

temporal1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 5:56 pm
temporal1 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:53 pm (i believe) numerous medications are regularly prescribed for “off-label” purposes.
one example, birth control pills are prescribed for various complaints.

bc pills are distributed to teens+children like candy.
presently, there’s a big push to get abortion pills distributed “like candy.”
i cannot bear the thought of pregnant young women, teens, children, going through these gruesome acts, alone, on toilets.
how can this be?? do females+children have no value at all??

yet. .. .. IVM and HCQ are deemed evil. :evil: God.have.mercy.
HondurasKeiser wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 10:57 am :arrow: This seems like reducing abortions is not the goal:
...on Friday, House Democrats united behind legislation they could almost all agree upon:
enshrining in federal law a virtually unlimited right to kill a baby through all nine months of pregnancy.

H.R. 3755...would invalidate nearly all state laws limiting and regulating abortion,
including many health and safety regulations designed to protect the lives of women.
It would create an absolute right to abort a child before “fetal viability” — that is, according to the Act, when a baby born would likely survive outside the womb — and it would prohibit states from protecting life after viability until birth if a lone “health care provider” determines the “continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk” to the mother’s life or “health.” The bill’s chief sponsor in the Senate has acknowledged the legislation “doesn’t distinguish” between physical and mental health, and the text of the bill explicitly instructs the courts to “liberally” interpret the legislation. There can be no doubt that courts would broadly interpret “health” as Doe v. Bolton, the companion case to Roe, defined health: “physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age. . . . All these factors may relate to health.”

Congressional Democrats have for decades introduced bills that would “codify Roe” — the legislation was long-known as the Freedom of Choice Act, but it was renamed and revised as the Women’s Health Protection Act in 2013. :evil:
Before Friday, however, the legislation had never been put up for a vote on the floor of the U.S. House or Senate.
“We haven’t been able to codify [Roe] because we never had a Democratic pro-choice majority with a Democratic president,” Pelosi said :evil: at a press conference on Thursday.

The United States is one of only seven nations on earth that allows elective abortions later than 20 weeks of pregnancy. :cry:
- National Review


.. And, blasphemy is “A-ok”
GaryK wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 10:57 am
Gov. Hochul: 'God wants you to be vaccinated'
https://www.whec.com/rochester-new-york ... d/6250851/
.. please stop voting for it. :-|
0 x
Josh

Re: Ivermectin

Post by Josh »

So, the governor of New York ascends the pulpit at a Pentecostal-style mega church in Brooklyn and preaches:
" Yes, I know you're vaccinated. they're the smart ones, but you know, there are people out there who aren't listening to god and what god wants. you know, this, you know who they are," Hochul said. "I need you to be my apostles, I need you to go out and talk about it and say, we owe this to each other. we love each other. Jesus taught us to love one another. and how do you show that love, but to care about each other enough to say, please get vaccinated because I love you. I want you to live."
She and I seem to be reading and understanding different Bibles.
0 x
Post Reply