Any institution supported by tax dollars will probably have to play by Woke Rules. That's why I'm for school vouchers.temporal1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:37 pm In another thread, one Kansas teacher is making an effort for sanity:
temporal1 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 13, 2022 8:17 pm [This does not state her religion/denomination.]
“A Kansas teacher is suing school officials for requiring her to address students by their preferred names,
saying the policy violates her religious freedom”
https://www.wlfi.com/news/national/a-ka ... 7222d.htmlA Kansas teacher is suing her school district superintendent, board members and principal after being suspended for not using a student's preferred name.
Pamela Ricard, who teaches math at Fort Riley Middle School, says she refuses to use the preferred names and pronouns of transgender and nonbinary students because it violates her religious beliefs.
After being disciplined multiple times for refusing to use a student's preferred name, Ricard filed a federal lawsuit against the Geary County Schools Unified School District on Monday.
In the lawsuit, she argues that denying requests to allow her to ignore students' preferred names and pronouns "deprived her of due process and equal protection of law" and violated her First Amendment rights to free speech and exercise of religion.
Ricard also accused the defendants of breaching their contract with her. .. ..
Women: losing
-
Falco Underhill
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2021 12:30 pm
- Affiliation: Hermit
Re: Women: losing
1 x
-
temporal1
Re: Women: losing
Maybe not. We know “the noise.” Courts can surprise: (i just noticed this.)Falco Underhill wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 9:11 pmAny institution supported by tax dollars will probably have to play by Woke Rules. That's why I'm for school vouchers.temporal1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:37 pm In another thread, one Kansas teacher is making an effort for sanity:
temporal1 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 13, 2022 8:17 pm [This does not state her religion/denomination.]
“A Kansas teacher is suing school officials for requiring her to address students by their preferred names,
saying the policy violates her religious freedom”
https://www.wlfi.com/news/national/a-ka ... 7222d.html
“Middle School Math Teacher Claims First Amendment Violation,
Sues School Over Suspension for Refusal to Address Student by Preferred Pronouns”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/mi ... -pronouns/
i have not read the legal document... Other elementary school teachers who, like Ricard, say their religious beliefs prevent them from calling a student by their preferred name and pronouns, have been somewhat successful in similar lawsuits.
A Virginia elementary teacher and football coach was reinstated after initially being fired for opposing a school board policy allowing students to use their preferred pronouns.
Another Virginia case, this time from a high school French teacher who refused to call a student by their preferred pronouns, is currently pending before the state supreme court.
A federal appeals court ruled in 2021 that college professors may have stronger “free-speech rights” when they are teaching.
Ricard’s lawsuit, filed on March 7, comes as laws targeting transgender youth and students and their families in multiple states are either being passed or challenged.
Florida’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill, currently before Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), would prohibit discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools from kindergarten through third grade.
In Texas, an executive order from Republican Gov. Greg Abbott classifies certain forms of treatment for transgender youth as “child abuse,”
and a proposed Idaho law would make gender-affirming treatment for transgender minors punishable by life in prison.
Read Ricard’s complaint, below. ..
laws are passed. laws are tested.
0 x
-
temporal1
Re: Women: losing
hmm. well. maybe ordinary folks have had enough.
the language in this report is very much as tho this is “all-wrong,” but, taking their bias into consideration:
“Nearly 240 anti-LGBTQ bills filed in 2022 so far, with most targeting trans people”
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-pol ... -rcna20418
lib media/propaganda is very effective in getting the message across: “give up, you have no choice.”
maybe not all are ready to “go along to get along.”
it’s really a shame how powerful mainstream media compromised their credibility for propaganda. not a wise trade.
the only possible way to get them to correct their ways is to stop buying what they’re selling.
a lot of people have.
- - - - - - -
“anti-trans,” or anti-others, is very poor framing. It’s a lie. It’s deliberate.
Truth is in everyone’s best interest. Truth may be difficult, it may not be what is “wanted.” It’s for the best.
Biased language based on false premises - is a HUGE problem in mainstream reporting.
This report is just another example of how they do it, 24/7.
the language in this report is very much as tho this is “all-wrong,” but, taking their bias into consideration:
“Nearly 240 anti-LGBTQ bills filed in 2022 so far, with most targeting trans people”
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-pol ... -rcna20418
the report continues ..State lawmakers have proposed a record 238 bills that would limit the rights of LGBTQ Americans this year — or more than three per day — with about half of them targeting transgender people specifically.
Nearly 670 anti-LGBTQ bills have been filed since 2018, according to an NBC News analysis of data from the American Civil Liberties Union and LGBTQ advocacy group Freedom for All Americans, with nearly all of the country’s 50 state legislatures all having weighed at least one bill.
Throughout that time, the annual number of anti-LGBTQ bills filed has skyrocketed from 41 bills in 2018 to 238 bills in less than three months of 2022. And this year’s historic tally quickly follows what some advocates had labeled the “worst year in recent history for LGBTQ state legislative attacks,” when 191 bills were proposed last year.
The slate of legislation includes measures that would restrict LGBTQ issues in school curriculums, permit religious exemptions to discriminate against LGBTQ people and limit trans people’s ability to play sports, use bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity and receive gender-affirming health care.
Proponents of these bills say they’re about protecting children, parental rights, religious freedom or a combination of these.
Opponents, however, contend they’re discriminatory and are more about scoring political points with conservative voters than protecting constituents. .. ..
lib media/propaganda is very effective in getting the message across: “give up, you have no choice.”
maybe not all are ready to “go along to get along.”
it’s really a shame how powerful mainstream media compromised their credibility for propaganda. not a wise trade.
the only possible way to get them to correct their ways is to stop buying what they’re selling.
a lot of people have.
- - - - - - -
“anti-trans,” or anti-others, is very poor framing. It’s a lie. It’s deliberate.
Truth is in everyone’s best interest. Truth may be difficult, it may not be what is “wanted.” It’s for the best.
Biased language based on false premises - is a HUGE problem in mainstream reporting.
This report is just another example of how they do it, 24/7.
0 x
-
temporal1
Re: Women: losing
Swimmer RILEY GAINES
Daily Wire Hosts REACT To Lia Thomas' Breaking Satanic Story / 5min
Daily Wire Hosts REACT To Lia Thomas' Breaking Satanic Story / 5min
Description:
“Former college swimming star Riley Gains made some explosive allegations about the private proclivities of her transgender pool nemesis Lia Thomas in a Wednesday interview with @CrainAndCompany
Daily Wire hosts @BenShapiro, @CandaceOwensPodcast ,@MattWalsh
reacted to this news and gave their opinions about the subject on their respective shows.”
0 x
IOC 2026 Re: Women: losing
IOC / 2026
INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE
2028?! - Why wait?
“International Olympic Committee announces new Policy on the Protection of the Female (Women’s) Category in Olympic Sport”
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has announced a new Policy on the Protection of the Female (Women’s) Category in Olympic Sport and Guiding Considerations for International Federations and Sports Governing Bodies.
Following today’s approval of the policy by the IOC Executive Board, it will apply for the LA28 Olympic Games onwards, and is not retroactive.
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/news/inter ... mpic-sport
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
There is a youtube/Fox link, but Bob Costas is CNN, so i’ll not add it.
Fox Interview with BC / “Bob Costas praises IOC's ruling on women's sports”
^^Dr Siegel and BC repeat:
“COMMON SENSE IS NOT TRANSPHOBIC.”
What a revelation.
Lib academia has done untold damage to western civilization, largely attempting to claim questionable social engneering EXPERIMENTS are settled science, forcing by force of the sword. What a racket it became.
Now for corrections. Plural.
INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE
2028?! - Why wait?
Who should adopt this policy?
This policy should be adopted by IFs and other sports governing bodies, such as NOCs, National Federations and Continental Associations, when exercising their responsibility in implementing eligibility rules in relation to IOC events only.
It replaces all previous IOC statements on this matter, including the Framework on Fairness, Inclusion and Non-discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity and Sex Variations.
It is important to note that this policy does not apply to any grassroots or recreational sports programmes.
Note to editors:
There is a video of IOC President Kirsty Coventry speaking about the announcement in the IOC News Room for download and use by media.
There is a press briefing with IOC President Kirsty Coventry today at 16:15 CET on this topic. You can follow live at www.youtube.com/iocmedia.
“International Olympic Committee announces new Policy on the Protection of the Female (Women’s) Category in Olympic Sport”
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has announced a new Policy on the Protection of the Female (Women’s) Category in Olympic Sport and Guiding Considerations for International Federations and Sports Governing Bodies.
Following today’s approval of the policy by the IOC Executive Board, it will apply for the LA28 Olympic Games onwards, and is not retroactive.
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/news/inter ... mpic-sport
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
There is a youtube/Fox link, but Bob Costas is CNN, so i’ll not add it.
Fox Interview with BC / “Bob Costas praises IOC's ruling on women's sports”
Fox News senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel unpacks the implications the IOC ruling banning trans athletes from women's sports on 'America Reports
^^Dr Siegel and BC repeat:
“COMMON SENSE IS NOT TRANSPHOBIC.”
What a revelation.
Lib academia has done untold damage to western civilization, largely attempting to claim questionable social engneering EXPERIMENTS are settled science, forcing by force of the sword. What a racket it became.
Now for corrections. Plural.
0 x
i’m perfectly comfortable with an older, wiser, more docile Trump.
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
”Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.” Robert Martz
- JimFoxvog
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 1:02 pm
- Location: Tiskilwa, Illinois, USA
- Affiliation: MC-USA
- Contact:
Re: Women: losing
Seems fair. We should be kind and compassionate towards those with gender identity disorder, but not make things unfair for women.
0 x