During our very brief time there we were quite shocked by multiple attempts to subtly separate us from our children. For us, the family is a nuclear unit, and the man is the head of his household. But it seems that living in community in the way the Bruderhof do, there is more emphasis placed on the collective community, to include communal childrearing.JohnH wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 9:01 amA challenge many seekers find who want to participate in mutual aid is that less-conservative churches don't really practice it anymore; they just rely on Social Security and Medicare for older people (meaning younger people can't be Social Security exempt anymore, despite the fact many of the older people often were when they were younger).Esdras wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 5:07 amOne thing that is very important to our family is the notion of mutual aid. We see it plainly taught in the Gospels and in Acts 2 and Acts 4 of course, along with even 2 Corinthians 8 which speaks of sharing your abundance so that there is an equality and that no one lacks. In addition to giving to those who ask of us, our family doesn’t even feel quite right about charging Christian brothers and sisters anything for our services or charity or generosity; if we can help, we help. We try (and often fail, but nonetheless, a righteous man falls seven times and gets up eight) to not let our right hand know what our left hand is doing and trust that anything we part with for the Lord’s sake or the gospel’s will be akin to storing up treasure for ourselves in Heaven where our hearts are.
In more-conservative churches, a different challenge is presented: mutual aid is often restricted to members, so if one decides to rely on it before one is a member, you will have to trust the mercy of your congregation to be willing to help a non-members' needs. This might, however, be a positive spiritual experience for both the congregation and for the seekers.
To give an idea of how exempt churches work, they generally believe participating in any insurance at all is not to be done, sometimes even eschewing liability insurance for automobiles. (This is, obviously, a moot point for horse and buggy groups.) Every possible need is first met by the congregation, and then via letters/collections sent out to other congregations. Retirement is generally expected to be met by one's children plus savings accumulated in a farm or business.Protestant Reformed Churches are very tidy and run much like a business in our limited experience and it has disheartened us greatly. Incorporating as a non-profit often incentivizes less charity in the United States as you can be accused of preferentially enriching private individuals as opposed to providing a public benefit. It is our understanding in our limited research that certain groups such as Freemasons (which we would never have anything to do with) as well as Anabaptist groups that have been providing for their own for 50+ years can legally exempt themselves from certain programs such as Social Security. To your point, this only makes sense if a community is willing to practice what the Apostle James regarded as a pure and undefiled religion, or what the Lord Jesus Christ simply regarded as being done unto Himself as it is done to “the least of these.”
If one joins such a church in their 40s and has no farm or business, it should be obvious you aren't really going to be able to accumulate enough to meaningfully benefit from this kind of system, although I maintain it is best to just trust the Lord, and that a good way to evaluate a congregation is how well it handles situations like these.
The Bruderhof are different from most other Anabaptists since they practice a community of goods. They have some theological beliefs that would mean I couldn't really ever be a member there, and they don't seem to practice the headcovering anymore either, leaving it up to personal conviction.From an outsider’s perspective it is a little difficult to hear that Anabaptist communities struggle in this area, but during a very brief visit with the Bruderhof in Tennessee we also had the opportunity to observe some things that we totally didn’t expect.
It was a very interesting experience, and I do not mean to come across as critical, we were just very struck by this experience and some other small things we noticed. When we had dinner with a family, for example, we were shocked that they did not say grace. They explained that because they lived the gospel out on a daily basis, these things were unnecessary.
We learned a lot, but we weren’t able to stay the night and really get a good sense of their community, as the children didn’t have lodging where we would be able to stay in the same room, they had curtains rather than doors, etc.
This created a situation, perhaps unintentionally, where there were adult strangers that would have been sleeping closer to our children than we were, had we stayed. One very nice lady (a grandmother) offered to have breakfast privately with one of our daughters, and the hosting family offered to let our children stay with them while we stayed in a separate house on the other side of the property.
All of this contributed to a great deal of unease from us as parents, partly because we both have parents that dealt with abuse and were at risk of trafficking. But also because that way of living is just very different from us.