The price displayed in the search results. AirBNB litigated it for years, and eventually lost; they now have to show all-inclusive prices.
It is completely lying to advertise the cost of a stay that doesn't include the cleaning fee. It is deceptive to not show the agency fee either, but at least I can mentally compute 15% in my head. If I do a search for a 1 day stays or 3 day stays, it is impossible to look at the search results and know what the cleaning fee will actually make the stay per night unless I click on each result.or are you saying that the full, final amount that is charged to your credit card is never shown prior to when you actually book? If the latter, yes, that would be lying about the cost of a stay. I believe it would also be illegal. If you are referring to the full, final price including all taxes and fees not being shown until the final step of booking, no, that is not lying about the cost of the stay, any more than many hotels and travel agencies which have the same sorts of practices.
But, hey, maybe the FTC and I are both wrong.
Go ahead and leave some negative reviews for guests and see what happens!Neither the host nor the guest can read the other's review prior to writing their own, so I don't understand what you are saying here. The only possibility of retaliation would be in future bookings, which typically don't happen when there is a negative experience. Now, I believe you can respond to the other's review, but that's only after you have already posted your review and rating, and you can't easily get those changed or removed.
AirBNB's business model is based around deceptive marketing and breaking the law. I don't think that's a good model for growth of businesses in America, and it's not like America didn't have short term rentals and hotels and motels before AirBNB existed. If AirBNB and similar online platforms didn't exist, you could still operate a guest house.But not unsatisfactory enough that Airbnb has not risen in popularity to the point where it really can't grow any more, according to your previous post.