This is a good addition. I'd be interested in seeing this list explained more by someone. Some of these seem to have overlap, and so I'm curious what the differences are thought to be.Ernie wrote:I think there are a lot of levels of discipline that the NT refers to.
Here are some...
1. rebuking sharply
2. not socializing with
3. dis-fellowshipping
4. excommunication
Also, the OP mentioned church standards but not church doctrine. I know a man about may age who was excommunicated a few years ago from a plain church and it was called a doctrinal excommunication. His character was good. He was a gifted scholar and speaker. But he had some very unorthodox basic beliefs about God and the Bible (somewhat universalist) and because he was so influential, the church felt they needed to call it out as false teaching. I think the church did the right thing.
Excommunication - What it is and is not
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
0 x
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
I would have thought that the last three are very similar. Dis-fellow-shipping and not socializing with would seem to be brought on by excommunication. We seem to have another status; that of a non-communing member. On a long term basis I would pretty much consider the terms mutually exclusive.
0 x
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
I'm curious if it is only to be used for "sin".
Technically "ex-communication" is actually to be put "out of communion".
I'm curious what you people think about guests who are preaching heresy? Isn't there a point when enough is enough?
Technically "ex-communication" is actually to be put "out of communion".
I'm curious what you people think about guests who are preaching heresy? Isn't there a point when enough is enough?
0 x
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
Is not heresy sin?Chris wrote:I'm curious if it is only to be used for "sin".
Technically "ex-communication" is actually to be put "out of communion".
I'm curious what you people think about guests who are preaching heresy? Isn't there a point when enough is enough?
Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.
0 x
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
Wade wrote:Is not heresy sin?Chris wrote:I'm curious if it is only to be used for "sin".
Technically "ex-communication" is actually to be put "out of communion".
I'm curious what you people think about guests who are preaching heresy? Isn't there a point when enough is enough?
Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.
Yes, it is a sin, but usually not one that is addressed easily because it can be "backed" from a "bible viewpoint". It's much more complicated than "sin-sin". It sews seeds of briers and thorns in the bride. Dangerous stuff.
0 x
- Josh
- Posts: 24191
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
- Location: 1000' ASL
- Affiliation: The church of God
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
Cast out a divisive man after 1 or 2 warnings.
("Heresies" in KJV means divisions, not false doctrine. False teachers are addressed elsewhere.)
("Heresies" in KJV means divisions, not false doctrine. False teachers are addressed elsewhere.)
0 x
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
Maybe your thinking of 1 Timothy 4?Josh wrote:Cast out a divisive man after 1 or 2 warnings.
("Heresies" in KJV means divisions, not false doctrine. False teachers are addressed elsewhere.)
0 x
- Josh
- Posts: 24191
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
- Location: 1000' ASL
- Affiliation: The church of God
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
Yes. But when KJV talks about "heresies", it's not talking about false teaching.Wade wrote:Maybe your thinking of 1 Timothy 4?Josh wrote:Cast out a divisive man after 1 or 2 warnings.
("Heresies" in KJV means divisions, not false doctrine. False teachers are addressed elsewhere.)
Yet another reason to avoid KJV for study.
0 x
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
What does ex-communication mean other than non-communing? I know how we use it. I'm proposing that we redefine/downgrade the term "excommunication" to mean "non-communing".Hats Off wrote:I would have thought that the last three are very similar. Dis-fellow-shipping and not socializing with would seem to be brought on by excommunication. We seem to have another status; that of a non-communing member. On a long term basis I would pretty much consider the terms mutually exclusive.
I don't have a term to propose in place of "cutting off from the body of Christ".
My thinking is that there are sins unto death, and there are sins not unto death. So, for example, if someone secretly breaks a church rule, that would be considered a sin (falling short of the mark) not unto death. This may result in "excommunication", which would not mean "marking him" or cutting him off from the body, but rather it would simply mean that he is a non-communing member.
If a person commits adultery, or murder, etc., that would be a sin unto death. A new term would be needed for this scenario.
Am I making sense?
0 x
-
- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Alberta
- Affiliation: Western Fellowship
- Contact:
Re: Excommunication - What it is and is not
I think so. However, I would have looked at a sin unto death as being an unpardonable sin. The apostle goes on to say that we don't need to pray for the person who has committed a sin unto death. That doesn't really fit the examples that you gave. Or am I misunderstanding something?RZehr wrote:What does ex-communication mean other than non-communing? I know how we use it. I'm proposing that we redefine/downgrade the term "excommunication" to mean "non-communing".Hats Off wrote:I would have thought that the last three are very similar. Dis-fellow-shipping and not socializing with would seem to be brought on by excommunication. We seem to have another status; that of a non-communing member. On a long term basis I would pretty much consider the terms mutually exclusive.
I don't have a term to propose in place of "cutting off from the body of Christ".
My thinking is that there are sins unto death, and there are sins not unto death. So, for example, if someone secretly breaks a church rule, that would be considered a sin (falling short of the mark) not unto death. This may result in "excommunication", which would not mean "marking him" or cutting him off from the body, but rather it would simply mean that he is a non-communing member.
If a person commits adultery, or murder, etc., that would be a sin unto death. A new term would be needed for this scenario.
Am I making sense?
0 x