It's rather is a sad commentary on mathematic education though.
Which did you use?
PEMDAS?
or
BODMAS?
Viral math problem baffles many on Internet: Can you solve 8÷2(2+2)?
Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
Hmmmph, you really shouldn't write a formula that way, it's ambiguous.
Why is this a sad commentary on mathematical education, though?Abstract: even in mathematics, ambiguities can be hard to spot. The phenomenon seen here in arithmetic goes beyond the usual PEMDAS rule and illustrates an ambiguity which can lead to heated arguments and discussions.
0 x
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
Well, answer me this. My children know the answer. What is 1 and 1?Bootstrap wrote:Why is this a sad commentary on mathematical education, though?
0 x
Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
In conventional integer arithmetic or some other system?Robert wrote:Well, answer me this. My children know the answer. What is 1 and 1?Bootstrap wrote:Why is this a sad commentary on mathematical education, though?
0 x
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
It has to be simple if my children know it.Bootstrap wrote: In conventional integer arithmetic or some other system?
0 x
Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
No guesses?
0 x
Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
I'm guessing concatenation: 1+1 = 11. But you could also use set membership: 1 + 1 = (1, 1). It really depends on the definition of 1 and the definition of "and", so you can use your imagination ... in binary, 1+1 = 10, for instance. Why shouldn't 1+1=0, we can jiggle our definitions to make that work.Robert wrote:No guesses?
That's why I asked the integer arithmetic question. In traditional integer arithmetic, there is only one boring answer. And if you are balancing your checkbook, I always recommend traditional arithmetic.
0 x
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
I understand multiplication without a multiplication sign to be similar to a parenthesis, so get 1, but 16 is also a reasonable answer for this ambiguous expression. If there were a multiplication sign I'd clearly read it as 16.
Interesting how the comments on the link often are so political!
Interesting how the comments on the link often are so political!
0 x
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
I got 16. I learnt BEDMAS in school.MaxPC wrote:It's rather is a sad commentary on mathematic education though.
Which did you use?
PEMDAS?
or
BODMAS?
Viral math problem baffles many on Internet: Can you solve 8÷2(2+2)?
0 x
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2019 8:30 pm
- Location: Near Mountain View, Arkansas
- Affiliation: Beachy Amish
Re: Viral math problem baffles many on Internet
My college algebra rules say 16. I did it on both graphing and scientific calculators just to see of it would say error (which it would if the notation was recognized as ambiguous) and got 16 then also.
0 x
Take the position that you're wrong, and your goal is to be less wrong over time. --Elon Musk